Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2007 November 7



Image:Ujlogo.png
Questionable GFDL-self claim Jusjih 03:07, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Suicmezmuhammed.jpg
Source site not found. Questionable GFDL claim. Jusjih 03:42, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * You may have tried the wrong link (has one w too much in the 2nd describe version). Try this.--NSX-Racer 11:44, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Sadly the picture can't be found at that website. Since www.necrophagist.de is marked as "© 2004 Necrophagist" it is questionable if a GFDL licence for this picture ever existed. --Andibrunt 12:24, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Spanish-iris.jpg
Need evidence of the public domain claim. Jusjih 04:28, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Spanish-iris-v2.jpg
Need evidence in PD. Jusjih 04:30, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:NeswExample.jpg
MBK004 04:46, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Titan T-51 - airshow1.jpg
Where is the paperwork? Liftarn 13:14, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Not deleted - uploader is an admin, provided copyright holder's name and company, no reason not to assume good faith. --B (talk) 21:49, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Bd5j.jpg
Where is the paperwork? Liftarn 13:25, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Not deleted - user asserts to be the photographer and owner of the aircraft, gives his real name, which he also gave in other uploads. On the surface, that seems to be a reasonable claim. --B (talk) 21:41, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:WWDSC01639.jpg
Image could be a copyright infringement. It has a watermark for "WWW.SERVFILES.COM". There are equally good free use images in its article (Langley Speedway (British Columbia)), so it could easily be orphaned with no loss to the article. — Royal broil  14:44, 7 November 2007 (UTC).

Image:Schlachter 1951.JPG
This is a book cover presumably not designed by the uploader, so it can't be GFDL-self. The obvious choice is that it's a non-free book cover; however, the same image at German Wikipedia says it's public domain because the cover is too simple to meet the threshold of originality. If that's true, it should be tagged PD-ineligible (and moved to Commons). What do others think? Is this PD or non-free? —Angr 16:27, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Clearly not SELF. I believe for our purposes that non-free book cover with an appropriate FU rationale be added.  Various versions of "Die zweite Revision von 1951" were printed between 1951 & 2000 (& probably after) and there's no way to determine which printing this might be.  If there's any doubt, better safe than sorry... SkierRMH (talk) 00:41, 18 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Not deleted - The cover is almost certainly ineligible for copyright, however, it is technically a photo of a 3D object, so I'm inclined to leave the tagging as is. If someone else wants to change it, I'm not going to get too upset one way or the other. --B (talk) 21:53, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Jpeg.jpg
Seems to be a copyrighted image Carlosguitar 16:44, 7 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Once deleted, title should be protected against recreation as an uninformative image name. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 23:04, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * In fact, it's a compilation of 5 copyrighted images for example. SkierRMH (talk) 00:48, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:SpamCop.gif
License does not seem to permit modification. Ilmari Karonen (talk) 23:01, 7 November 2007 (UTC)