Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2007 September 12



Image:Helenkeller.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:16, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Source link is dead (and doesn't look authoritative), doesn't look older than 1923 Calliopejen1 07:32, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Probably from the 1940s or so, definitely not pre'23. Could easily be PD, but seems to be no way to verify. Wily D  21:46, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I can't see it either. -- But | seriously | folks   08:05, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:ElbridgeGerry.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:16, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Source doesn't look authoritative as to PD status. Not used in any articles. Calliopejen1 07:37, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Jackbeanstalk.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:16, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

1933 film, no evidence it's PD Calliopejen1 17:05, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * This film is available on The Cartoons that Time Forgot: The Ub Iwerks Collection, Vol. I, a cheap-o cartoon DVD. This is a pretty strong indication that it has fallen into the public domain. — Brian ( talk ) 22:05, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Comicolor-title.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:16, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Show that ran between 1933 and 1936, no evidence it's PD Calliopejen1 17:07, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * This series is available on The Cartoons that Time Forgot: The Ub Iwerks Collection, Vol. I and Volume II, cheap-o cartoon DVDs. This is a pretty strong indication that it has fallen into the public domain. — Brian ( talk ) 22:05, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Motherhubbard.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:16, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

1935 film, no evidence it's PD Calliopejen1 17:09, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * This film is available on The Cartoons that Time Forgot: The Ub Iwerks Collection, Vol. I, a cheap-o cartoon DVD. This is a pretty strong indication that it has fallen into the public domain. — Brian ( talk ) 22:05, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:51620000174_01.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:16, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

The copyright tag on the image mention official symbols and currency of Romania not beeing covered by copyright, but I fail to se how this apply to this image. Sherool (talk) 17:25, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:MeanBean.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:16, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image clearly says "AOL CityGuide" in the watermark. Does not seem consistent with the licensing info. I don't believe image is needed as a fair use. SQL(Query Me!) 20:50, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.