Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2007 September 18



Image:Perfectly pear white.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

likely copyvio - needs to be retagged as non-free After Midnight 0001 00:43, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Ivana_Djokic.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence that uploader is copyright holder. Videmus Omnia Talk  04:37, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Southall-Gills.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

This image is tagged as a sports event poster, which it clearly isn't. Given the quality of it, it appears to be a photo taken by a professional sports photographer, which would suggest it's been "lifted" from a website or other copyrighted source. — ChrisTheDude 07:52, 18 September 2007 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:RisciLogo.bmp.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Logo for a Insitution Sfan00 IMG 10:00, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Hawthorn_banner.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Team Banner, (C) in Banner presuambly with the team concerned? Sfan00 IMG 10:10, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

There is no logo or any other possible copyright infringement in this image. I created the image and it is my own work. --Rulesfan 22:11, 23 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Don't see any issue. Image talk page updated. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:05, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:SR_King_Arthur_poster.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I1 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Not releaseable as CC-By-SA, See copyright notes on source site, In addition original would be ultimaitly by Southern Railway (and Uk rules on coporate works would apply), The posted could be included under fair-use as it does have historical relevance. Sfan00 IMG 10:24, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

I have re-uploaded with a fair use rationale as suggested. Nsorelli —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nsorelli (talk • contribs) 13:38, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Channel4+1Logo.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Logo - Definitely NOT GFDL Sfan00 IMG 10:34, 18 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Now tagged fair-use-in-Channel 4. NFA. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:08, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Draug EmelinAgnetheMyhre.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

"for use on Wikipedia only" Liftarn 10:56, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:PC280086.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia only permission. Garion96 (talk) 18:49, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Miami_sign.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

even if this is a photo of a sign, the sign is surely protected by copyright Calliopejen1 19:56, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Helensvale_Town_Centre_sign.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

photograph that is primarily of a copyrighted sign... free or nonfree? Calliopejen1 19:57, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

The sign is not copyrighted. --WikiCats (talk) 05:44, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:RCA1802 CPU.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Nothing at source says it's free. Liftarn 21:04, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Razorbackstadium4.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

this image is located at http://www.city-data.com/picfilesv/picv5370.php and has been there since 2004. the uploader has previuosly uploaded other unfree images of this stadium. Calliopejen1 21:13, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Wanted2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

this is a wanted poster distributed by the DoD, but if they had taken a photo of him this good themselves, i don't think a wanted poster would be necessary. I think this would be fair use, but that we should change the tag. Calliopejen1 22:46, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.