Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2007 September 21



Image:Colm Mc Fadden Donegal GAA-Player.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

This image appears to have be a photo of a television picture. The copyright is owned by the broadcasting company and we cannot use it freely. B 04:05, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Angham_X-Factor.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader unlikely to be copyright holder. Videmus Omnia Talk  04:09, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Layali_television.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Videmus Omnia Talk  04:10, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Letterkenny General Hospital.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Appeares to be a photo of a television program and thus non-free B  04:12, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Priestly_home.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Declined speedy. Image tagged CC-by-sa appears at http://pubs.acs.org/cen/acsnews/7945/7945acsn2.html. I don't see a CC license there.  But | seriously | folks   04:31, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Crazytourprogram.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Scan of program, i.e. non-free Liftarn 08:24, 21 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Pandorapeaks.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence that uploader is copyright holder. Videmus Omnia Talk  15:59, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I emailed the uploader asking him for details about how he got the images. His reply was: "These are free pictures that I found on the Internet." Deleting the image on the basis that they are probable copyvios. Tabercil 22:57, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Summerbcex3017.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence that uploader is copyright holder. Videmus Omnia Talk  15:59, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I emailed the uploader asking him for details about how he got the images. His reply was: "These are free pictures that I found on the Internet." Deleting the image on the basis that they are probable copyvios. Tabercil 22:57, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:9-mar-04-110.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

user has uploaded other copyrighted photos of airplanes and claimed he took them himself - see e.g. Image:Buzzard-End5.jpg. also, i don't think normal people can just take perfectly in-focus shots looking down on fighter jets in flight. Calliopejen1 17:53, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:C12newimage.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

user has uploaded other copyrighted photos of airplanes and claimed he took them himself - see e.g. Image:Buzzard-End5.jpg. Calliopejen1 17:54, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:London_fog-mist.PNG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

user has uploaded other "self-taken" images that are obviously not self-taken, and this isn't used in any articles anyway. Calliopejen1 17:56, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Bristol_Buckingham.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Photo published in (identified) 1946 book, with no specific credit to the photographer. "Photographer not identified, so UK Copyright contended to have lapsed 50 years after publication." Is this a valid PD claim? Calliopejen1 18:40, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: Source of image appears duly stated by the uploader. The claim by the uploader of no photographer attribution in this type of source is entirely credible. And it's not a high-resolution image, thereby making it easily convertible into fair-use if credible evidence is presented to the contrary. ... Kenosis 02:20, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Maybe it could be fair use, I don't know how rare the subject is. But my question was whether just having no photographer identified makes the copyright lapse 50 years after publication, which has not been resolved. Calliopejen1 19:29, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Tredegar-House.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

from a UK govt website, presumably under crown copyright Calliopejen1 18:46, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Massietrial.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

subject born 1911, said to be released into PD by state archives, but that is not possible Calliopejen1 18:48, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Douglas_Havoc_II.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

photograph published in 1941 UK book. "Photographer not identified, so UK Copyright contended to have lapsed 50 years after publication." is this a valid PD claim? Calliopejen1 19:50, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Achaemenid_spoon.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Looks like a scan, not a self-made photo. Problem pointed out by another user at WP:MCQ. Calliopejen1 21:36, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Jerryonly2006.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

reason this image is non-free 81.216.156.75 22:32, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.