Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2007 September 23



Image:FH-Padma.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Permission only extends to WP. Eligible for speedy, but I have suggested that the uploader make contact again with the author to get proper permission. There are about 10 more images in the same situation, by the way.  But | seriously | folks   01:08, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Even so, might not the "non-free character" tag apply? Though if you think not I'll ask again - what is it, for completely free use? Roscelese 17:46, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:World_map_worlds_first_second_third.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader revised a prior image which was apparently uploaded as self-made with all rights released. Unfortunately, the prior image and its creator are not identified, and this presents a GFDL problem.  But | seriously | folks   05:53, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * While I'm not a lawyer, I believe if the previous creator released all rights, their inclusion as a contributor is not required by any license. The derivative work was what was GFDL'd. i kan reed 21:33, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Commons showing through. -Nv8200p talk 02:11, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Playbill_coverthrill.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Derivative work. Videmus Omnia Talk  13:18, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Ruth_Fernandez.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

no evidence of GFDL on source site Garion96 (talk) 18:27, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Zeny_y_Zory_posed.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Seems there it only permission to post on Wikipedia. Garion96 (talk) 18:40, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Billy_Philippines2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

stated source is an entertainment website but tagged with conflicting licenses (self-made and promotional). bluemask (talk) 23:59, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * hi. i decided to take out the "self-made" license tag, i'm still not good at copyrighting images correctly. since billy crawford's image is from an entertainment website that contains news reports and the like i decided to use the "non-free promotional" tag. this image is the most current one of billy and i decide for it to not get deleted. i don't have an account for that site (may not plan on getting one) so i haven't spoken to the editor of the image or site. we can still fix the problem if needed. thanks for reading. Totakikay 03:03, 24 September 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluemask (talk • contribs)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.