Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 August 10



Image:Henry.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Clearly not created by uploader, who has a history of uploading copyrighted images. Corvus cornix talk  21:33, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Obvious copyvio of a Getty Images photo (original is here). I've marked it for super speedy deletion. --Mosmof (talk) 22:48, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:X3 map.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploaded under the public domain, but there's no indication at the source that it is. It *could* have been uploaded by the creator, though, so I'd rather not speedy it. Anyone mind looking into this? — Hers fold  (t/a/c) 02:26, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Tagged as no permission; uploader notified --Rlandmann (talk) 21:24, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Li Ning.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

User:Tee Meng added this photo from the Beijing opening ceremony and claims it is their own work. Given that there is no proof, the picture looks too similar to many media images from the Olympics, and the user seems to have a history of violating copyright on images, I have added this notice to seek clarification. Harr o 5 04:08, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Rev george snow.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

The subject of this painting died in 1977. The uploader is not the artist, and almost certainly not the copyright-holder. The artwork is very unlikely to fall in the public domain for any other reason. — mholland (talk) 12:04, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Map_of_aritar_lampokhari.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

PD Claim - But states Wikipedia only - Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:35, 10 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Hello sir, this image was created by me using an image editor for my website, But I do not use it there anymore, so I want this image to be available here for wikipedia for free, But if you still thinking about unknown copyright issue (After I just gave your written &copy; permission) you may delete it for good. regards. --Sikkimonline (talk) 19:10, 24 August 2008 (UTC)


 * By releasing it for Wikpedia, you need to be aware of certain things see WP:COPYREQ, it would also be advisable to lodge

a formal notifcation of the permissions granted with the OTRS queue:) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:29, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Konyaseker.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Looks a copyrighted logo; No source. OsamaK 14:49, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Voldemars Veiss.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

This image was listed at Copyright problems/2008 August 2/Articles by Man pl with a stated rationale of "How is it possible that the autor died over 100 years ago if he made this photo during WWII?" I can't tell the difference by sight between a WWI and a WWII uniform. But even if this photo was taken during WWI, the photographer and date of first publication of the photo are not listed at the image page. The source given is a book published in 1986. Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:25, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, Image:Rumpler 6B-1 751 at Zeebrugge.jpg (nebulous publication history; scan from a book published in 1989)
 * Image:AGO C.I.jpg (scan from the same 1989 source)
 * Image:Avro 503.jpg (scan from the same 1989 source)
 * Image:Piaggio P108A.jpg (nebulous publication history; scan from a book published in 2000)
 * Image:G4M2 ATAIU.jpg (scan from the same 2000 source)
 * The five images listed below the primary were added as having similar concerns--original date of publication and photographer are unclear, as unaddressed by uploader, while the work from which they were scanned is very much not public domain. It seems likely that whatever is determined about one will be determined about all six. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:52, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Image:Piaggio P108A.jpg would fall under the PD-Italy considerations. FWiW Bzuk. In checking alll other images, they simply seem to be misidentified as to PD status, they are all PD, if written up correctly. (talk) 17:01, 10 August 2008 (UTC).


 * Of these images, Image:Avro 503.jpg, Image:Rumpler 6B-1 751 at Zeebrugge.jpg and Image:AGO C.I.jpg are certainly pre-1919 as they represent WWI types that were not preserved, while Image:Piaggio P108A.jpg and Image:G4M2 ATAIU.jpg are both WWII aircraft, with the Piaggio definately pre-May 45 (as the aircraft photographed was definately destroyed before the end of the war, while the G4M2 is a Japanese bomber captured by the Allies and undergoing testing either during or shortly after the end of WWII. Clearly, tagging them as Life + 100yr is wrong as none of these photos were taken more than 100 years ago. It might be possible to argue life+ 70 for the three WWI aircraft IF we knew who took them and when they died and whether life + 70 applies in Germany (where they were taken).
 * For the Piaggio, it would depend where the photo was taken - if it was taken after it was captured by the Germans following Italy's surrender in 1943, but before being flown to Germany in 1944, then it is probably public domain under Italian laws. If it was taken after it was flown to Germany, then it is non-free.  The G4M2 was photographed during testing by Allied forces after capture, probably by British Commonwealth forces.  It could well be Crown Copyright expired.Nigel Ish (talk) 17:15, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

My conclusions regarding these images:
 * Image:Voldemars Veiss.jpg - most likely taken between 1941 and 1945, so I don't think it is old enough to guarantee any variation of PD.
 * Image:Rumpler 6B-1 751 at Zeebrugge.jpg - likely 1914-1919, but no way to determine date of first publication, or date of death of the author.
 * Image:AGO C.I.jpg - as above.
 * Image:Avro 503.jpg - as above.
 * Image:Piaggio P108A.jpg - we do not know where it was taken, therefore we cannot in good faith leave the PD-Italy tag.
 * Image:G4M2 ATAIU.jpg - no way to determine where, when or by who the photo was taken.

On all of these, the original sources, date of first publication, and the original author are unclear, and so I am erring on the side of caution in deleted all. Kevin (talk) 06:31, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Jpeg_2000.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Screenshot - Source of underlying images unattributed Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:42, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I created this with Paint Shop Pro a long while ago. I'm confident that it is copyright free, but since it is not being used it can be deleted without any harm. -- ♦Ian Ma c  M♦  (talk to me) 22:34, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:FTSE-350-DIA-Sept05.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Unable to find specified license notice on website, no OTRS.   Asenine   17:17, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:ASX-200-DIA-Sept05.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Unable to find specified license notice on website, no OTRS.   Asenine   17:18, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:FinalCutProScreenshot.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Claimed, but this is a screenshot of Final Cut Pro 5, which is not free software. —Bkell (talk) 18:20, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * What I would like to know is: who has the rights to the contents displayed in Final Cut's Canvas window in this screenshot? Show Final Cut operating on public domain footage and that would take care of all the problems, in my opinion.  Anton Mravcek (talk)

Hi, Im Alex George and Im a media teacher for a local high school. I created this work and I grant ALL permissions for wikipedia and wikimedia to use it. I really don't care about the stuff I create...As long as no one sells it...I'm fine with it. If you guys want proof, I can give you guys the full 23GB show. 23:43, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

I just want to say that other apple logos like this one have been used and there have been no problems. This might be a simple license problem or something. --Robo56 (talk) 22:15, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Flyer.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

PD Claim - But flyer design.. presuambly (C) to the club that produced it? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:49, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Borgslaegtens_historie_stor.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Claim of PD-100 but film only released in 1921? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:57, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * If it was released in 1921, it still passes the 1923 rule of PD-US. It's the wrong tag, but I don't see a problem. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:41, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Stifle (talk) 14:53, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Stella power station lemington.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image was tagged with no source- uploader simply replaced the tag with the name of the author, but still no explanation of why the image is PD. J Milburn (talk) 23:13, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Lem Cone Upshot.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader replaced the 'no source' tag with a name and a link to this image. That is not a source. User has uploaded numerous other non-free images claiming that they are free/PD. J Milburn (talk) 23:22, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Old scotswood bridge.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image may be PD, but I am not certain, and the uploader has uploaded a very large number of non-free images as free. I doubt significantly that the image is CC. J Milburn (talk) 23:31, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Lynemouth power station 2008.JPG
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image is from Flickr, by someone called Fintan, and was uploaded by someone called Fintan. However, I am dubious as the user has uploaded a lot of stolen images as free, does not assert this image as their own explicitly and the image is tagged as all rights reserved on Flickr. J Milburn (talk) 23:43, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Deptford Power Station.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image may possibly be free- seems to be old, but I do not want to judge the licensing myself right now. I am suspicious because if it is free, it won't be CC, but PD, and because the uploader has uploaded a large number of non-free images as free, which I am now in the process of deleting. J Milburn (talk) 23:53, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The source website has South Western Electricity History Society All rights reserved and explicity states that they do not want any information in the public domain. Tagged as CSD:I9 copyright violation. MilborneOne (talk) 19:20, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.