Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 August 11



Image:Dmitri Rogozin.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Find it hard to imagine author was this close (without further explanation). He would have to be a reporter to get this shot. Superm401 - Talk 00:16, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Matlock 2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Source website claims that this is a Francis Firth card dated from the 1930s. I am not seeing why this is public domain. J Milburn (talk) 10:53, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, Copyright violoation, uploaded after an honest mistake following a conversation with source website owner, Sorry, Highfields (talk) (contribs) 14:08, 14 August 2008 (UTC) (Uploader)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Matlock 1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Photograph from 1910s. No indication it was published at the time or that the copyright holder has released this in any way. J Milburn (talk) 10:54, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, Copyright violoation, uploaded after an honest mistake following a conversation with source website owner, Sorry, Highfields (talk) (contribs) 14:09, 14 August 2008 (UTC) (Uploader)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:New.Bondpedia.Logo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Appears to incorporate the copyrighted Bond opening sequence, meaning that even if this is the uploader's own work, they have no right to release it. J Milburn (talk) 11:00, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Nangsibsong1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image very unlikely to be owned by website owner- they seem to just steal images from elsewhere and then not credit/half credit. J Milburn (talk) 11:05, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Chateau Montaigu.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I1 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Appears to be a scan/photo of an old sketch/engraving. Uploader is unlikely to be the copyright holder of the source image. J Milburn (talk) 11:10, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Tagged as no source and no license for the original work --Rlandmann (talk) 21:21, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Old image of hari parbat.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader is unlikely to be the copyright holder. J Milburn (talk) 11:22, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Tagged as no source and no license for the original work --Rlandmann (talk) 21:29, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Dee Dee Bridgewater 2005.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

I don't think Vance Jacobs is an employee of the U.S. government... Lupo 11:24, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. The photo was taken from the NEA website See here. If the NEA doesn't own the rights to the photo they always say "published by permission of...". In this case they didn't which means it is a government photo. Furthermore, the photo was taken at an NEA event along with multiple other pictures by Vance (including a photograph of NEA Chairman Dana Gioia) at the event. Therefore, the liklihood that Vance was hired to take photos by the federal government is more than high, it is a certainty. FYI, the federal government hires freelance photographers all the time for short term work. This really was a dumb nomination for a possible unfree image. All Lupo had to do was go to the NEA website link provided to see it was valid. In fact, this image would be a great nom to be copied to the wikicommons. Nrswanson (talk) 12:05, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * There is no need to try to insult me. Please note that the U.S. government can and does hold copyrights on works made by contracted third parties on behalf of a governmental agency. Vance is not an employee of a U.S. governmental agency, and thus you cannot blindly presume that the work was PD as a work of a U.S. governmental agency. Contact the NEA and get them to make a clear statement that the image was in the public domain (if they are the owners of the copyright, they may declare it PD if they so want), and then forward this statement to OTRS. Lupo 08:44, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Is that really necessary here Lupo? All of the pictures from that NEA event were taken by Vance on mulitple pages, such as on this page and others. I really think this is an obvious keep. I would like the opinion of some other editors on this before I have to go to a lot of trouble to get approval. Also, Vance listed the NEA as a client here  and whether he was just a part time/ free lance employee or not, the law still requires that all photos taken by him while working for a federal government agency are in the public domain. Basically, if the the federal government paid him to take the photograph legally it is in the public domain.Nrswanson (talk) 15:47, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * "Basically, if the the federal government paid him to take the photograph legally it is in the public domain." Not true. The NEA may have contracted him to take these photos, but that doesn't automatically make these photos "PD as a U.S. government work". A contractor is not a government employee. It may well be that the NEA made him sign over the copyrights, or that the NEA is the copyright holder as "works made for hire", and that the NEA then decides to put these images into the public domain. But where's the evidence that they do so? Asking them will clear up any confusion. Lupo 19:29, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I think you and I disagree with the legal issues here. I believe that the product of contracted workers in this case is covered under the law as a work of the United States governement. They don't need to specify it because that's the law. I don't believe Vance Jacobs could legally own the rights because that would be against the law. They have to be in the public domain. Is there a place where we could get a definitive ruling on the legalities involved here? Also sorry for snapping at you earlier. I should have been more civil. Nrswanson (talk) 19:32, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * It's allright, I've been through much worse. :-) For the base of my argument, please see Gorman, R. A.: Copyright Law, 2nd ed., U.S. Federal Judicial Center, June 19, 2006; chapter 2: The Subject Matter of Copyright, section "Government works", pp. 52ff: "Not swept within the exclusion under section 105 would be a work commissioned by a branch of the U.S. Government and authored by an “independent contractor” or a freelance writer or artist." and then Gorman uses his own work as an example: "As an example of the operation of these statutory provisions, one might consider this monograph on copyright law, prepared under contract for the Federal Judicial Center. Its author is not an “employee” of the U.S. Government, and so it cannot be prepared as part of any “official duties” with the Government. Accordingly, this monograph is eligible for copyright protection in the name of the author. (The author has in fact agreed voluntarily to transfer the copyright to the Federal Judicial Center, which may and does hold a valid copyright as transferee pursuant to section 105. It is, of course, for the Center to decide whether to enforce that copyright or rather to allow some or all members of the public to make copies.) Had the work instead been written by, say, an employee in the Copyright Office as part of his or her job responsibilities, it would indeed be treated as a work of the U.S. Government and would thus be ineligible for copyright protection." Also see CENDI copyright FAQ, section 4.0, and WP:PD. Lupo 07:57, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * P.S.: Please also check the NEA's copyright notice: "Other [i.e., not created by the NEA; Lupo] articles and images on the Web site may be reproduced only with permission. Copyright is retained by the individual author or artist." Lupo 10:25, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Ah, thanks for clarifying that.Nrswanson (talk) 10:28, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Lupo is correct that only works created by employees of the federal government in the course of their official duties are in the public domain by default. A contractor is not an employee and, under the law, contractors retain the copyright on works they produce unless the contract explicitly indicates a transfer of copyright to the hiring party. Without knowing the terms under which Jacobs was working with the NEA it's not possible for us to know whether he was an employee, a contractor who retained copyright, or a contractor who transferred copyright. Thus, we need to err on the side of caution here and request information from the NEA before we can declare that this photograph is in the public domain. -- Hux (talk) 06:36, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Wcwilliams.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No indication at source that the image is public domain. DrKiernan (talk) 11:31, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Williams was born in 1883. Here is Williams in 1924. It clearly post-dates the image above; by a decade or two, I would say. 86.44.22.12 (talk) 21:17, 11 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, but it's the date that this photo was originally published that's important; the date that it was taken is irrelevant. --Rlandmann (talk) 21:33, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Reznikoffphotobig.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I11 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Source is a dead link, and as the original source was a student at Wash U, it is unlikely that they were the copyright holder. DrKiernan (talk) 11:51, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Tagged as no permission --Rlandmann (talk) 21:35, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:RecoveredMatisse'.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image is tagged as PD as it was first published pre-1923, but was only painted in 1928. J Milburn (talk) 11:59, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, The recovery of the painting in question is discussed in the article, plus I have added a rationale for it's use. I have also changed the "tag" Tony the Marine (talk) 14:49, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Cx I9P0111.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Posed, looks like a publicity shot, which is somewhat suspicious without an explanation. J Milburn (talk) 12:01, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:LAX Adventurer Hotel Zoe Crosher.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

I doubt an image is both FAL and PD, and the source website doesn't seem to say anything about either. J Milburn (talk) 12:06, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Tagged as no permission --Rlandmann (talk) 21:38, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:MarkLamarr.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Appears to be a duplicate of this image. J Milburn (talk) 12:41, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:IainLee.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I5 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Appears to be a duplicate of this image. J Milburn (talk) 12:43, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Magnetic disc system for polishing.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Source website is all rights reserved, I am not seeing any indication that this image is free. J Milburn (talk) 12:46, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * OTRS ticket has been provided --Rlandmann (talk) 21:39, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Ineson.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Appears to be a duplicate of this image. J Milburn (talk) 12:48, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Vacuum impregnation equipment.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Source website does not appear to license content under the GFDL. J Milburn (talk) 12:49, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * OTRS ticket has now been provided. --Rlandmann (talk) 21:40, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Hot mounting press.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Source website does not appear to license under GFDL, but a specific source wasn't given so I can't be sure. J Milburn (talk) 12:53, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * OTRS ticket has now been provided --Rlandmann (talk) 21:40, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Oracle_data_organisation.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I11 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

PD claim- But assumed (C) IBA And thus possibly Crown Copyright? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:17, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Tagged as no permission --Rlandmann (talk) 21:42, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Thamesvalley2.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:25, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No indication of GFDL relase on source site Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:20, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Tagged as no licence (for the source image) --Rlandmann (talk) 21:49, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Thamesvalley2.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No indication of GFDL relase on source site Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:20, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Uploader and maintainer of ukfree.tv maybe same entitiy :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:19, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:New_aerial_after_switchover.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Ukfree.tv sourced - No indication that site licenses as PD Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:22, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note that the uploader has not specified ukfree.tv as the source, but image is similar to others that he has sourced to this site. --Rlandmann (talk) 21:52, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Three_muxes_after_switchover.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

ukfree.tv Sourced - No indication that site releases as PD Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:23, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note that the uploader has not specified ukfree.tv as the source, but image is similar to others that he has sourced to this site. --Rlandmann (talk) 21:53, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Three_multiplexes_after_switchover.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

ukfree.tv sourced - No indication site relases as PD Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:28, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note that the uploader has not specified ukfree.tv as the source, but image is similar to others that he has sourced to this site.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:ITV_West_new_region_boundary.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No indication source indicated releases as PD - Not PD Self Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:29, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Tagged as no license for the original image --Rlandmann (talk) 21:56, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Luftfoto.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

I am not seeing anything about GFDL on the source page, but I can't read it. J Milburn (talk) 14:53, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Tagged as no permission --Rlandmann (talk) 22:00, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Avidotz.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Posed, web-resolution, no meta-data. Looks like a professional (military?) shot. Uploader is unlikely to be the copyright holder. J Milburn (talk) 15:01, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - non-free replaceable image. It was taken from the IDF website. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 06:12, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Belgrave Mill.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Looks to be an old image, I doubt it belongs to the uploader. J Milburn (talk) 15:37, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination withdrawn. J Milburn (talk) 16:05, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Coltbrennan.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Originally tagged with no source, a source has been provided but I am not seeing anything on the source page that says these images are public domain. J Milburn (talk) 16:59, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Tagged as no permission --Rlandmann (talk) 22:02, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:20K Bomb.PNG
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G6 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image clearly incorporates one of the old BBC 2 logos. See, for instance, this screenshot. J Milburn (talk) 17:37, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: I have replaced the background of one of the old BBC2 logos with a single black background. --  20000  Talk/Contributions 18:13, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

*Keep as it now has its own 2. -- 92-Deayton (talk) 14:29, 12 August 2008 (UTC) Forged signature.   Ase ' nine ' '' 18:51, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - Still a copyvio.   Asenine   18:22, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The image is still based on the logo. You cannot take a copyrighted image and keep modifying it until it is your own- you'll have to start again from scratch, I am afraid. J Milburn (talk) 19:40, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep as this has been updated with a new appearance. -- SCARFACE  20:11, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Still delete until the source of the photo of the bomb is clarified. J Milburn (talk) 20:51, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: Scarface has been blocked as a sock of The Twenty Thousand Tonne Bomb. J Milburn (talk) 13:30, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: Should this be removed from WP:PUI It's been wiped clean now. -- 92.21.87.87 (talk) 14:10, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
 * P.S. Uploader is "indef"-blocked now. -- 92.21.87.87 (talk) 14:10, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:PhaicTănMap.PNG
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No OTRS stating that 20k is the author ("I, the copyright holder [...]") and there appears to be no PD notice on the website.   Asenine   18:46, 11 August 2008 (UTC) *Keep as per 20K's post. -- 92-Deayton (talk) 14:29, 12 August 2008 (UTC) Forged signature.   Ase ' nine ' '' 18:51, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even if the map was created by the user, the logos and photos within the image probably do not belong to the uploader. J Milburn (talk) 19:43, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep this as the geography of this fictional country seems pretty integral to the article. --  20000  Talk/Contributions 20:10, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep as per above. -- SCARFACE  20:11, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: Scarface has been blocked as a sock of The Twenty Thousand Tonne Bomb. J Milburn (talk) 13:30, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Even though uploader is "indef"-blocked, this should be kept as the geography of this fictional country seems pretty integral to the article. --  M R .  K RINGLE   (  XMAS  )  08:00, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per Kris Kringle. --  Ehh  Mon   Ehh  08:10, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Flag of Phaic Tăn.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Depicts insignia, whether created by a user or not. See here.   Asenine   18:52, 11 August 2008 (UTC) *Keep as it was originally from the Commons. -- 92-Deayton (talk) 14:29, 12 August 2008 (UTC) Forged signature.   Ase ' nine ' '' 18:51, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even though this image now has a fair use rationale and the flag itself is discussed in the article, I do not feel it is particularly important, and do not feel that the information needs to be included- have any reliable sources discussed the flag? I do not feel comfortable including a non-free image just to help visualise something that isn't even discussed in any reliable sources. J Milburn (talk) 19:49, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as I actually copied this from the Wikimedia Commons. It is on there: click here. --  20000  Talk/Contributions 20:03, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as per above. -- SCARFACE  20:12, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: Scarface has been blocked as a sock of The Twenty Thousand Tonne Bomb. J Milburn (talk) 13:30, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:SanSombrèroMap.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No OTRS stating that 20k is the author ("I, the copyright holder [...]") and there appears to be no PD notice on the website.   Asenine   18:55, 11 August 2008 (UTC) *Keep. -- 92-Deayton (talk) 14:29, 12 August 2008 (UTC) Forged signature.   Ase ' nine ' '' 18:51, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete if an image of such a map could be user-created without counting as a derivative work. Otherwise, keep this as the geography of this fictional country seems pretty integral to the article. J Milburn (talk) 19:52, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. -- SCARFACE  20:12, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: Scarface has been blocked as a sock of The Twenty Thousand Tonne Bomb. J Milburn (talk) 13:31, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:NSYNC.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Photograph taken by Andrew Southam, not created by 20K. Source: here.   Asenine   18:56, 11 August 2008 (UTC) *Keep as this is a significant image to use on the article, not because of Scarface, but because of my own thoughts. -- 92-Deayton (talk) 14:29, 12 August 2008 (UTC) Forged signature.   Ase ' nine ' '' 18:51, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Very Strong Keep as this is a significant image to use on the article. -- SCARFACE  20:18, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: Scarface has been blocked as a sock of The Twenty Thousand Tonne Bomb. J Milburn (talk) 13:31, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Even though uploader is "indef"-blocked, this should be kept as the photo, taken by Andrew Southam (  NOT  20K), seems pretty integral to the article. --  M R .  K RINGLE   (  XMAS  )  08:00, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per Kris Kringle. --  Ehh  Mon   Ehh  08:10, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:20K Bomb Dislike.PNG
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G6 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Clearly contains part of the BBC2 logo (or former logo).   Asenine   19:04, 11 August 2008 (UTC) *Note: It's OK now, he's sourced the source with this and the other one. -- 92-Deayton (talk) 14:29, 12 August 2008 (UTC) Forged signature.   Ase ' nine ' '' 18:51, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, clearly a derivative work of a copyrighted logo. J Milburn (talk) 19:53, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as I have replaced the BBC2 logo (or former logo) with my own black background and white 2. --  20000  Talk/Contributions 20:00, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as per above. -- SCARFACE  20:13, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Still delete until the source of the bomb photo has been clarified. J Milburn (talk) 20:52, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Still delete - Per J Milburn. Once uploader clarifies source I will be ok.   Asenine   21:03, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: Scarface has been blocked as a sock of The Twenty Thousand Tonne Bomb. J Milburn (talk) 13:31, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: Should this be removed from WP:PUI? It's been wiped clean now. -- 92.21.87.87 (talk) 14:10, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
 * P.S. Uploader is "indef"-blocked now. -- 92.21.87.87 (talk) 14:10, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:BQpagesIssue2.JPG
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Copyrighted magazine cover.   Asenine   21:02, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Cluedo first edition.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I11 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

User falsely asserts copyright ownership of the image of the first edition of the Clue board game (unless uploader can provide verification/permission). Cirt (talk) 23:58, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Listed as no source and no license for the original work contained in this derivative work --Rlandmann (talk) 19:47, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.