Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 August 14



Image:HairsprayCast Snoopdogg.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

This image was taken from wireimages.com and is almost certainly not taken by Veeboy. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:35, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Marcia_Williams_2007.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

This image was commissioned by the subject, who owns the copyright, and has licensed to the public under Creative Commons. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymousrex (talk • contribs) 18:55, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Haranfamily.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader claims that the image was released by the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and is licensed under GFDL. I tried to google for images titled 'Haran' and 'Haranfamily' at mfa.gov.il, and no results came up. It appears the images is taken from, and there is no indication that it would be a free image nor that the source would be the Israeli MFA. — Soman (talk) 12:50, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Point of self-correction. The image can be found at . However, there is still no indication that the image would be free. The caption reads 'Courtesy Doron Golan', and gives no indication of free use of images at the website. --Soman (talk) 12:55, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * http://www.mfa.gov.il has no problem in having it wikipedia, want me to confirm that per email? They have published that photo as well as the photo of Samir Kuntar (the one which is used in his article). I am certain teh Israeli state is not going to sue wikipedia for a photo they placed out there for the public to see. Anyhow thanks for checking and correcting.On.Elpeleg (talk) 15:59, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs has been contacted to clarify the issue. —Preceding unsigned comment added by On.Elpeleg (talk • contribs) 18:39, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Doron Golan was a baby when this photo was taken place. Doron Golan works as a photographer in ynet.co.il and mfa.gov.il was greatfull for his kindness in providing ALL the photos for this article, nothing more nothing less. This photo was taken by Smadar Haran, the mother of Einat and it distributed freely (tv, papers and else) since the murder took place. I am removing the note about it from the article. You can see the photo in another version here: www.samirkuntar.net note the stamp on the top hand left side, showing the photo provided by Smadar for the public to see. You may have also noticed that this is bed time photo, you don't really think that one week before her family was murdered, she would call a photographer (which was about 5 years old then...) to take this photo. Can we start getting serious? —Preceding unsigned comment added by On.Elpeleg (talk • contribs) 22:24, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Safarimickey.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Character design - stil subject to (C) Protection Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:27, 14 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I took this photo. I licensed it to Wikipedia under the GFDL. What's the problem? - Brian Kendig (talk) 20:25, 14 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Charcter designs may be protected, especially Mickey Mouse :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:46, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Partners.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: kept with license updated Skier Dude  ( talk ) 02:14, 26 February 2012 (UTC) This is just a collection of copyrighted logos, the creator cannot release that into PD!)) 193.138.105.1 (talk) 16:25, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Promo1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

"from my Personal SMITHS autograph collection" does not make the uploader copyright owner of the album cover art — dave pape (talk) 17:44, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Disneys-contemporary-resort-mosaic.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I8 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Flagged as derivative work on Commons Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:29, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I took this photo. I licensed it to Wikipedia under the GFDL. What's the problem? - Brian Kendig (talk) 20:26, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * It's a derivative work of the copyrighted mosaic. Authorization from the artwork's copyright owner is necessary to do that; without their authorization, you can't release it under a free license.  --dave pape (talk) 01:14, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
 * A low-resolution photograph of a copyrighted work is not, itself, a derivative work. - Brian Kendig (talk) 22:40, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes it is. Stifle (talk) 10:45, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.