Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 August 18



Image:Tekken 6.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The fair-use rationale is lacking detail, and the image isn't really of a poster, as indicated in the license template Asher196 (talk) 04:24, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * As a flyer is a form of a small poster, I didn't think it would really matter. Besides, I can't find a non-free flyer template. Calamity-Ace (talk) 13:36, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Keep Don't be so stingy. It's fair-use, it doesn't hurt anyone. Shrine Maiden (talk) 17:53, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Agreed - it's clearly not free, so listing this at PUI is pointless. As the single identifying image for this article subject, I don't see what the problem is. Would the nominator be happy if we replaced the poster license with Non-free game cover? --Mosmof (talk) 23:05, 18 August 2008 (UTC)


 * closing this. Not a case for PUI; problems (if any) are purely formal issues about tagging. Routine fair use case. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:57, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Captain Juan Fernando Casado.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:23, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

This is a composite image that combines multiple images, sources of which are not cited. Unless the uploader created ALL the elements, PD-self does not apply. Mosmof (talk) 05:22, 18 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete: Yup, chuck it, I know the guy who did it, he was new to Wikipedia at the time. Plus it's not used in any articles. Ryan 4314   (talk) 07:28, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Crophairstyle.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:23, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Only source information is "Image created/edited by me from larger picture found on internet". No indication of original author or source. Not a candidate for fair use, since the image is easily replaceable. — Matt Eason (Talk &#149; Contribs) 08:45, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Julien Cardy.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:23, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

No evidence the free website cited as the source is in fact the copyright owner. Highly unlikely. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:05, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Aegan poster.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:23, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Obviously a film poster, several watermarks. Very unlikely uploader owns the rights to the image. J Milburn (talk) 14:08, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:GeorginaWilcock2344x2832.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:25, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

The author and subject are listed as the same person, and this image and the page on which it is used are the only creations of the uploader in over two years. Stifle (talk) 14:10, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Sussexemms.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:23, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Originally listed at WP:CP, but no source is given. The first tagger indicates there that "this image is probably a photograph of a copyrighted map." Lacking clear source, moving this here for resolution. Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:21, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Date Unknown-Rabbi Tanenbaum & Cardinal O'Connor.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:23, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Seems unlikely this was created by the uploader- "date unknown" and the writing in the top corner both seem inconsistent with this user being the creator. J Milburn (talk) 14:39, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:JF17.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:23, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Uploader is probably not the author - taken from http://www.defencetalk.com/pictures/showphoto.php/photo/5981/size/big dave pape (talk) 15:00, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Copyvio tagged as CSD I9 - The Pictures in the gallery are for research and educational purposes only. MilborneOne (talk) 20:24, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:LKO convent.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:23, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Low resolution, no meta-data. Looks as if the image has been taken from elsewhere. User has uploaded other suspect images. J Milburn (talk) 17:13, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Found it here with tineye.com --Rlandmann (talk) 09:31, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Spitzz.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:23, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Low resolution, no meta data. Old image (subject looks young, colour looks to be from an old camera) from a young user (I'm assuming young due to the 1990 in the username). I doubt this image was taken by the uploader. J Milburn (talk) 17:15, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:A Propet For Our Time.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:23, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

A book cover from a commercial press. I doubt it is licensed under the GFDL. J Milburn (talk) 17:22, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:MBAirport.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:23, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Low resolution, no meta-data, border, no explicit source info. Looks as if the image may have been taken from elsewhere. J Milburn (talk) 17:30, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * From page http://www.myrtlebeachinfo.com/mblovescanada/transportation.html Link to image. MilborneOne (talk) 20:26, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Spitzz.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:23, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Uploader unlikely to be photographer. Kelly hi! 17:31, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Glavnaposta.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:23, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Low resolution, no meta-data, border. Looks as if this image may have been taken from elsewhere. J Milburn (talk) 17:37, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Found here with tineye.com --Rlandmann (talk) 09:33, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Bazen tasmajdan.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:23, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Low resolution, no meta-data. I suspect this image may have been taken from elsewhere. User has uploaded other suspect images. J Milburn (talk) 17:46, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Found here with tineye.com --Rlandmann (talk) 09:34, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Spgroup.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:23, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

It says in the summary, "This was scanned from the back of an action figure package". Wouldn't that make it copyrighted by the maker of the figures? Rockfang (talk) 21:02, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes. I've advised the uploader to take a look at the fair use policy, and pointed him to one of your images as an example --Rlandmann (talk) 21:35, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.