Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 August 22



Image:Creator.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Source site's legal terms do not appear to be compatible with the GNU FDL license. Rockfang (talk) 04:46, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * This should be PD-textlogo. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:14, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Creator_screen.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Source site's legal terms do not appear to be compatible with the GNU FDL license. Rockfang (talk) 04:47, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Teamwest0003.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

User uploaded a number of copyvios from http://www.uwesu.net/uwehc/ to Commons (see redlinks in upload log), and although I can't find this exact picture, the resolution and lack of metadata strongly suggest this is from the same group. jonny - m t  10:06, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Romeo Miller-May 2008.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Looks like a publicity shot. Uploader is unlikely to be copyright holder. J Milburn (talk) 11:10, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Karnataka Tourism map.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader seems unlikely to be the creator. J Milburn (talk) 11:24, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Basaveshwara North Karnataka.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader is clearly not the copyright holder. J Milburn (talk) 11:25, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Kitturu Rani Channamma.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Appears to feature a postage stamp or something akin, which the uploader is unlikely to own the rights to. J Milburn (talk) 11:26, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Kittur Channamma.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

A postage stamp or something similar, which the uploader is unlikely to own the rights to. J Milburn (talk) 11:27, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Karnataka map.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader seems unlikely to be the copyright holder. J Milburn (talk) 11:31, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Map of Karnataka.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader is unlikely to be copyright holder. J Milburn (talk) 11:32, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Kinhal craft 4.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Source seems to pretty clearly be all rights reserved. J Milburn (talk) 11:44, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Kinhal craft 3.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Source website is all rights reserved J Milburn (talk) 11:45, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Kinhal craft 2.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Source website is all rights reserved. J Milburn (talk) 11:46, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Kinhal craft 1.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Source website is all rights reserved. J Milburn (talk) 11:46, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Louise Brooks Portrait.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

the source website contains a numbers of portraits of this actress. All appear to be either professional portraits or publicity photographs, and there is nothing on the website to say that any are free of copyright restrictions Rossrs (talk) 13:55, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Louise Brooks and GW Pabst.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

the source website contains a numbers of portraits of this actress. All appear to be either professional portraits or publicity photographs, and there is nothing on the website to say that any are free of copyright restrictions Rossrs (talk) 14:02, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:ABQ.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader states, "This photo belongs to the ACS planning Division We have full permission to use this photo!". ACS planning division is a division of the City of Albuquerque (see Thomasalazar diff; Thomasalazar is a sock puppet of PoliticianTexas). It is not clear that City of Albuquerque has granted permission to use this image. The uploader, Martinez07, has been blocked indefinitely for being another sock puppet of PoliticianTexas. Uploader has had several other images deleted for lack of permission or for copyright violation. --Uncia (talk) 14:46, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Pulling pui and using db-copyvio. I found the source of the image; it is a copyrighted stock image belonging to Marble Street Studios and does not belong to City of Albuquerque after all. --Uncia (talk) 16:42, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * After deleting the image as per WP:CSD, I checked the blocked user's image contribs for other images which have not been deleted. It seems likely that some or all of them may be similarly eligible for deletion.  — Athaenara  ✉  20:47, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Cotr map.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Claimed, but source says at the bottom, "© 2008 College of the Rockies. / All rights reserved." No evidence is given for the Creative Commons claim. —Bkell (talk) 14:50, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Revue_Noire_Magazine.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: kept with license updated Skier Dude  ( talk ) 02:15, 26 February 2012 (UTC) Obvious non-free image - its a magazine cover falsely marked as being released under GFDL -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 15:09, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Shouldn't the tag just be changed to ? --Eastmain (talk) 18:27, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - the licence has now been replaced by a 'Non-free magazine cover' licence with a fair-use rationale.--Eastmain (talk) 04:22, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Moto_Magazine.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: kept with license updated Skier Dude  ( talk ) 02:16, 26 February 2012 (UTC) Magazine cover falsely marked as being released under GFDL -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 15:11, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - the licence has now been replaced by a 'Non-free magazine cover' licence with a fair-use rationale.--Eastmain (talk) 03:59, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Glendora_Review.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: kept with license updated Skier Dude  ( talk ) 02:23, 26 February 2012 (UTC) Magazine cover falsely marked as being released under GFDL -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 15:11, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - the licence has now been replaced by a 'Non-free magazine cover' licence with a fair-use rationale.--Eastmain (talk) 22:43, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Hei!_Voetsek!Magazine.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Magazine cover falsely marked as being released under GFDL -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 15:12, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Okeane.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I1 by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Magazine cover falsely marked as being released under GFDL -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 15:12, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Duplicate image, tagged for speedy deletion. --Eastmain (talk) 04:22, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Y-Mag.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: kept with license updated Skier Dude  ( talk ) 02:24, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Magazine cover falsely marked as being released under GFDL -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 15:12, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I changed the licence to Non-free magazine cover  --Eastmain (talk) 22:32, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Frank_Talk_Magazine.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: kept with license updated Skier Dude  ( talk ) 02:24, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Magazine cover falsely marked as being released under GFDL -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 15:13, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - the licence has now been replaced by a 'Non-free magazine cover' licence with a fair-use rationale.--Eastmain (talk) 22:43, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Civil_Lines_Magazine.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: kept with license updated Skier Dude  ( talk ) 02:25, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Magazine cover falsely marked as being released under GFDL -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 15:13, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - the licence has now been replaced by a 'Non-free magazine cover' licence with a fair-use rationale.--Eastmain (talk) 22:43, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Savacou_Magazine.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: kept with license updated Skier Dude  ( talk ) 02:25, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Magazine cover falsely marked as being released under GFDL -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 15:14, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - the licence has now been replaced by a 'Non-free magazine cover' licence with a fair-use rationale.--Eastmain (talk) 22:43, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Greg_Tate.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Magazine cover falsely marked as being released under GFDL -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 15:14, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. This is a photo of a journalist rather than a magazine cover. GFDL claim seems unlikely, though. --Eastmain (talk) 04:18, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Third_Text_Magazine.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: kept with license updated Skier Dude  ( talk ) 02:26, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Magazine cover falsely marked as being released under GFDL -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 15:14, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - the licence has now been replaced by a 'Non-free magazine cover' licence with a fair-use rationale.--Eastmain (talk) 04:22, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Autre_Afrique_Magazine.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: kept with license updated Skier Dude  ( talk ) 02:26, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Magazine cover falsely marked as being released under GFDL -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 15:15, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - the licence has now been replaced by a 'Non-free magazine cover' licence with a fair-use rationale.--Eastmain (talk) 04:22, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Staffrider_Magazine.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: kept with license updated Skier Dude  ( talk ) 02:26, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Magazine cover falsely marked as being released under GFDL -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 15:16, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - the licence has now been replaced by a 'Non-free magazine cover' licence with a fair-use rationale.--Eastmain (talk) 04:22, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Souffles_Magazine.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: kept with license updated Skier Dude  ( talk ) 02:27, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Magazine cover falsely marked as being released under GFDL -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 15:16, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - the licence has now been replaced by a 'Non-free magazine cover' licence with a fair-use rationale. Smile a While (talk) 21:41, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Lamalif_Magazine.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: kept with license updated Skier Dude  ( talk ) 02:27, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Magazine cover falsely marked as being released under GFDL -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 15:17, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - the licence has now been replaced by a 'Non-free magazine cover' licence with a fair-use rationale.--Eastmain (talk) 22:43, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Joe_Magazine.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: kept with license updated Skier Dude  ( talk ) 02:27, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Magazine cover falsely marked as being released under GFDL -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 15:18, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - the licence has now been replaced by a 'Non-free magazine cover' licence with a fair-use rationale.--Eastmain (talk) 22:43, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. }

Image:Okyeame_Magazine.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: kept with license updated Skier Dude  ( talk ) 02:27, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Magazine cover falsely marked as being released under GFDL -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 15:19, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - the licence has now been replaced by a 'Non-free magazine cover' licence with a fair-use rationale.--Eastmain (talk) 22:43, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Tipwindmill.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Appears to be a crop of an image from here. Archive link predates image upload. — Wafulz (talk) 17:19, 22 August 2008 (UTC).

I am the owner of the photo in question and the webmaster of the Tiptree Turner website, and I also originally uploaded the image to Wikipedia. Please contact me at david@tiptreeturner.co.uk if necessary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tippatree (talk • contribs) 14:18, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Very disappointed that my photo was replaced on the Tiptree page by another picture of the windmill, leaving the suggestion that it was 'stolen' from my own website by myself. Surely there must be an easier way of communicating concerns about photos than this before they are erased from the page in question... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tippatree (talk • contribs) 12:18, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Sscrlogo-lighted.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

GFDL Claim - But has Fair USe rationale - Conflict? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:55, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:MeritInConstructionTroops2ndClass.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Medal design - No indication given to support PD Claim. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:17, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:MongolianExcellentBorderGuardBadge.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Derative of medal design - No indication medal design is PD Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:18, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:BreyersJamaicaPlain.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Product image - Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:22, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Commons licensing guidelines allow for products of everyday use with a simple design. I would argue that this is a product of everyday use with a simple design. IronGargoyle (talk) 06:50, 24 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, copyrighted image, the uploader does not have the right to release it. Stifle (talk) 13:36, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * To be clear, I am the photographer and uploader of this image. Deletion, if appropriate, would be based on more esoteric arguments as this is not simply a lifted image as the above comment might seem to indicate.  Thanks. Boston (talk) 20:11, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:SCRNDUMP.gif
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image claimed as PD despite having multiple UI's which are under copyright. Also claimed is a temporary upload Wikipedia is not your webhost. Q T C 21:24, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Emails.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I3 by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Derivative works of four different logos, user can't really assert to be copyright holder of this work ... - Cirt (talk) 22:29, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Image is also orphaned. Cirt (talk) 02:53, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:SCRNDUMP.gif
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Screenshot of IE on Windows XP; Orphaned. OsamaKReply? on my talk page, please 23:24, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Cropped by me. Just let us know if the upload still needs that screenshot (It is orphaned now)--OsamaK 21:37, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Dataprobe_Logo.gif
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

This is a logo of a company (Dataprobe). It is mostly copyrighted. Cannot be self-licensed. OsamaKReply? on my talk page, please 23:25, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

I am authorized, as President and CEO of the company to upload this image. --Dweissnj (talk) 14:00, 25 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Please confrim said authorisation in respect of the image with the permission queue on the OTRS system, see WP:COPYREQ.

It will help avoid future problems :). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:45, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. Permission has been sent to the OTRS --Dweissnj (talk) 21:32, 2 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Permission to use received via OTRS. Image tagged. - Rjd0060 (talk) 23:40, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Django_default_page.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: kept old questioned version evidently deleted Skier Dude  ( talk ) 02:29, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Replaceable screenshot on Mac OS. OsamaKReply? on my talk page, please 23:30, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Image is taken by me, freely licensed as noted on the image page, of free software running inside free software (open-source web framework viewed through Firefox). I see no way that a good-faith argument could be made that there is a copyright issue with this image. Ubernostrum (talk) 23:37, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, I agree. This image is pretty clearly free. IronGargoyle (talk) 06:52, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Stifle (talk) 13:48, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * How come! We deleted many screenshots on Windows XP and Vista. Is Mac OS different kind? That's clearly a copyright violation.--OsamaK 13:55, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * That debate's probably best had at Commons as part of a discussion on policy. Take it there, please? Ubernostrum (talk) 16:41, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.