Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 August 25



Image:McLaren to Maas0001.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Claimed to have been created by Norman McLaren. Uploader states (on user page) that he's nephew of the recipient; this would not make him the copyright owner. dave pape (talk) 00:57, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, since McLaren was gay, and presumably had no children, there is a good chance that the nephew is his heir. In which case, he would definitely be the copyright owner. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:09, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Good chance would not stand up in court, having possession of the material does not give you the copyright. We must assume good faith but there is no evidence that they are the legal copyright owner. Bit of legal paperwork into the OTRS system is probably required. MilborneOne (talk) 21:39, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, he's nephew of the recipient (Maas), not of McLaren (the work's creator). --dave pape (talk) 14:33, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh. Right. heh... I totally missed that. Delete then. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:20, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:McLaren to Maas0002.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Claimed to have been created by Norman McLaren. Uploader states (on user page) that he's nephew of the recipient; this would not make him the copyright owner. dave pape (talk) 00:58, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * See my comment above. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:12, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:BSMS Intro.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned, and has a URL linking to the uni site it was taken from. I can't find anything suggesting that the image is PD, as claimed. --Hugh Charles Parker (talk - contribs) 04:31, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:BSMS Teaching Building IT Suite.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned, image with a PD tag, but also a URL pointing to where it was taken from - a university site with nothing I could find to suggest that their images are PD. --Hugh Charles Parker (talk - contribs) 04:25, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Tim pawlenty.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

This image was tagged with copyvio, which is for articles, and listed at WP:CP. It does not site its source, but it is located in the official Minnesota photo gallery, here. The uploader asserts that "The Constitutional Office of the Governor of the State of Minnesota produced this image and freely allows its use." I don't see anything at the site to verify that the image may be modified or reproduced, commercially or otherwise, so bring it here for examination. Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:53, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree with moonridden there is no conclusive statement about free-use of this image. And considering so many Governor pages do not have their official portrait, I doubt MN would be different. .:davumaya:. 18:54, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Tssr01.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No reliable sourcing for licensing validity. —  pd_THOR  undefined | 17:02, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Yodsaenklai Fairtex.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence of being PD. -- aktsu (t / c) 18:29, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Flema001.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Author is stated to be "Rodriguez Peña", wich the uploader does not appear to claim beeing. Instad the image is sourced from his "collection". How the image came to be in his collection and why it's supposedly public domain is not clear however. Sherool (talk) 20:10, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Football205.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Lacks source info, looks like a screenshot of a TV broadcast to me though. Suppose there might be some "copyright now renewed" thing going on, but without more source info that's a big asumption to make. Sherool (talk) 20:17, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Foto_campus-04.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Can't find any info on the source website to support the PD tag. Sherool (talk) 20:45, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:NTI.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Can't find any info on the source website to support the PD tag Sherool (talk) 20:47, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Universitary_Hospital.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Can't find any info on the source website to support the PD tag Sherool (talk) 20:47, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Law_School_UFPE.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Can't find any info on the source website to support the PD tag Sherool (talk) 20:47, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Foto_cfch.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Can't find any info on the source website to support the PD tag Sherool (talk) 20:47, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Franketienne.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Nothing on the source website about this beeing public domain. Sherool (talk) 21:17, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Gazzo1.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:07, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

The site linked to as source states "© 2004 Princess Productions Ltd." no info to support the public domain tag on this. Sherool (talk) 21:48, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Hello! I can confirm I own the image copyright and not Princess Productions. Any questions just holler. (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 03:46, 15 September 2008 (UTC).

Hopefully the correct copyright status on image is correct now. Satchett —Preceding unsigned comment added by Satchett (talk • contribs) 01:26, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:GNewlands.JPG
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Seems to be a standard case of confusing "publicly available" and "widely distributed" with public domain. Sherool (talk) 21:52, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Gary_Johnson.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

State government content is rarely released as public domain like US federal government content is, and indeed the state of New Mexico website is labeled "Copyright 2006 State of New Mexico", making it unlikely that this is in fact PD as claimed. Sherool (talk) 21:56, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:GKM_portrait.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

The copyright policy on the source website only state that: Copyright in the material which appears at the Wesley Mission website is vested in The Uniting Church in Australia Property Trust (NSW).

You are welcome to reproduce the material which appears at the Wesley Mission site for personal, in-house or non-commercial use, without formal permission or charge.(...). Personal / Non-commercial use only does not equal public domain, such limitations in fact make this non-free by Wikipedia standards. Sherool (talk) 21:58, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.