Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 December 15



Image:Louisiana_License_Plate_(PSJ_036).JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:28, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

This is a derivative work. The rendering of the pelican is a copyrightable element. Nv8200p talk 03:21, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * So is there any way to include an image of an automobile license plate here on Wikipedia? Qqqqqq (talk) 06:25, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * There's no other way to demonstrate or show the license plate in question without having a picture of it; there's no free equivalent image available. Perhaps the licensing of the image just needs to be changed to reflect this, rather than bringing out the Image Delete Gestapo... the future IP lawyer in me says this would easily be a fair use. --Mr. Brown (talk) 07:27, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Deleted, although I would entertain a request to restore the page if someone made a fair use claim. Stifle (talk) 12:41, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I think the previous comment was such a claim. Qqqqqq (talk) 19:45, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it was. Sadly, they obviously don't realize or know the definition of "fair use". --Mr. Brown (talk) 00:19, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Sery.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:28, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

orphaned, no proof that uploader is the "owner" mentioned in the summary Skier Dude  ( talk ) 06:07, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:SespeWildernessLocMap.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:28, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

orphaned, no indication of source of base map, which may be (c) Skier Dude  ( talk ) 06:08, 15 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I made the map using ArcGIS 9.2, using public domain data. Nothing is copyright.  It is orphaned because I haven't written the article yet.  I case anyone is unfamiliar with the process, ArcGIS is a GIS software package with which you can combine data from many sources, in this case USGS digital elevation model data (hillshade), US government data for boundaries (national forests, wilderness areas), and US Census TIGER data (roads and so forth).  I made the basemap from public domain data and have released it into public domain; I tried to be clear about this in the file description.  Thank you, Antandrus  (talk) 14:34, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Stifle (talk) 12:41, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Seven82.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:28, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

if this is an official corporate logo uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude  ( talk ) 06:11, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * This is a clear example of PD-textlogo. Far too simple of a design for copyright. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:43, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Shalwaarkameez.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:28, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

appears to be photoshopped (derivative) version of a commercial image Skier Dude  ( talk ) 06:19, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Shamsuipomarket.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:28, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

orphaned, no proof of OTRS "permission" from website mentioned in summary Skier Dude  ( talk ) 06:20, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Capt.de0a40575894417fa9981de7395f9e80.spain real madrid huntelaar soccer vc803.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:28, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Unlikely the work of the uploader User:anti6666 as the pictures is found on and more from same serie is found on FIFA.com. --> Halmstad,  Charla to moi  09:20, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Penmaenmawr_Prom_001.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:28, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

If a person scans the front of a postcard, I don't think that makes them the copyright holder. It may still be public domain due to copyright expiration though. Rockfang (talk) 09:47, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I am the person who scanned the postcard. There is no date on it (the stamp was removed thus destroying most of the frank mark) but it is vintage and clearly dates to the early Edwardian period, c. 1900-1910, most definitely pre-World War I. There should be no copyright problem for an item of that age, about 100 years old. Please do not delete this. Enaidmawr (talk) 00:19, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Having checked the file page - should have done so in the first place, I guess - I can now see why this came up. My fault as a newbie contributor at the time (over two years ago). Quite simply I shouldn't have chosen that licence tag. As explained above, the postcard in question is about 100 years old so I see no reason whatsoever which could justify its deletion. Hope that clears things up and saves a valuable historical image (the promenade has gone and part of the top of the mountain has been quarried away, alas). Enaidmawr (talk) 23:53, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I understand. I'm not suggesting the image has to be deleted.  I just wanted to make sure the right license was on there.  If the image is public domain due to copyright expiration (due to it being really old), then I think the license should be changed.  I'm kind of weak on the different types of free use licensing so I brought it here to get another opinion.--Rockfang (talk) 00:14, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, glad to hear that. And I agree with you about the free use licenses: they can be very confusing. I rarely upload images now unless it's a photo taken by myself as it's frankly more hassle than it's worth, so you are probably better able to choose an appropriate licence than I am. Please feel free to do so. Regards, Enaidmawr (talk) 23:45, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Stifle (talk) 12:42, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Zagorakis paok 2008.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:28, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Nominating this and all other image uploads from : Several of these images can probably be deleted per WP:CSD as blatant copyvios with no plausible free license claim (File:Kostas frantzeskos.jpg from, File:Sergio conceicao.jpg from , File:Zagorakis paok 2008.jpg from ) and the remainder also look like press agency photos uploaded with erroneous free license claims. — Muchness (talk) 14:25, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * File:Kostas frantzeskos.jpg
 * File:Pablo garcia.jpg
 * File:Fernando santos.jpg
 * File:Sergio conceicao.jpg
 * File:Toursounidis.JPG
 * File:Sergio conceicao.jpg
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:"City of India,Actress Prachee Adhikari for some promotion,New Delhi 1 - Oct 2007. jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:28, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Promotional image claimed as public domain, and no metadata attached. Optigan13 (talk) 23:50, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * That's because it's a cropped version of the promotional image at . Delete. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I've deleted the image, as it was both an obvious copyvio and was causing issues due to the ". jpg" extension. This is an area of WP that I'm never around, though, so I'm not sure how to close this request... EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 01:42, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.