Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 December 16



Image:Kisschasy1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:28, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

The image was uploaded by crediting Martin Philbey as the creator and with the claim to be public domain. No evidence exists that the creator ever approved this a PD photo. Indeed, the image can be found here Mattinbgn\talk 01:11, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Unanimous_Chocolate_Bar.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:28, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Because it is a product image depicting a trademarked/copyrighted package -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 02:21, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * That looks pd-textlogo to me. And we don't care about trademarks. ViperSnake151 23:34, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Large collection of Images

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Deleted- F ASTILY  (TALK) 01:50, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Image:I cy (penguin)2.jpg
Definitely a picture of the creature, but definitely not a Wikipedia webpage. So no source, nor a proper license. Q T C 02:34, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:I cy (penguin).jpg
Definitely a picture of the creature, but definitely not a Wikipedia webpage. So no source, nor a proper license. Q T C 03:00, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:SpiDog.jpg
Definitely a picture of the creature, but definitely not a Wikipedia webpage. So no source, nor a proper license. Q T C 03:02, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:SpiDog black.jpg
Definitely a picture of the creature, but definitely not a Wikipedia webpage. So no source, nor a proper license. Q T C 03:02, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:SpiDog .jpg
Definitely a picture of the creature, but definitely not a Wikipedia webpage. So no source, nor a proper license. Q T C 03:03, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:IDog white.jpg
Definitely a picture of the creature, but definitely not a Wikipedia webpage. So no source, nor a proper license. Q T C 03:03, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:IDog wallpaper 1.jpg
Definitely a picture of the creature, but definitely not a Wikipedia webpage. So no source, nor a proper license. Q T C 03:04, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:IDog spots.jpg
Definitely a picture of the creature, but definitely not a Wikipedia webpage. So no source, nor a proper license. Q T C 03:04, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:IDog soft speaker.jpg
Definitely a picture of the creature, but definitely not a Wikipedia webpage. So no source, nor a proper license. Q T C 03:04, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:IDog soft speaker pink.jpg
Definitely a picture of the creature, but definitely not a Wikipedia webpage. So no source, nor a proper license. Q T C 03:05, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:IDog soft speaker blue.jpg
Definitely a picture of the creature, but definitely not a Wikipedia webpage. So no source, nor a proper license. Q T C 03:05, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:IDog multi spots.jpg
Definitely a picture of the creature, but definitely not a Wikipedia webpage. So no source, nor a proper license. Q T C 03:05, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:IDog mini types.jpg
Definitely a picture of the creature, but definitely not a Wikipedia webpage. So no source, nor a proper license. Q T C 03:05, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:IDog mini rock.jpg
Definitely a picture of the creature, but definitely not a Wikipedia webpage. So no source, nor a proper license. Q T C 03:05, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:IDog mini rock green.jpg
Definitely a picture of the creature, but definitely not a Wikipedia webpage. So no source, nor a proper license. Q T C 03:06, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:IDog mini rock blue .jpg
Definitely a picture of the creature, but definitely not a Wikipedia webpage. So no source, nor a proper license. Q T C 03:06, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:IDog mini pop.jpg
Definitely a picture of the creature, but definitely not a Wikipedia webpage. So no source, nor a proper license. Q T C 03:06, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:IDog mini pop 2.jpg
Definitely a picture of the creature, but definitely not a Wikipedia webpage. So no source, nor a proper license. Q T C 03:06, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:IDog mini hip hop.jpg
Definitely a picture of the creature, but definitely not a Wikipedia webpage. So no source, nor a proper license. Q T C 03:06, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:IDog mini dance.jpg
Definitely a picture of the creature, but definitely not a Wikipedia webpage. So no source, nor a proper license. Q T C 03:06, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:IDog mini dance 2.jpg
Definitely a picture of the creature, but definitely not a Wikipedia webpage. So no source, nor a proper license. Q T C 03:06, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:IDog mini cher.jpg
Definitely a picture of the creature, but definitely not a Wikipedia webpage. So no source, nor a proper license. Q T C 03:06, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:IDog lime.jpg
Definitely a picture of the creature, but definitely not a Wikipedia webpage. So no source, nor a proper license. Q T C 03:07, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:IDog kiss star student.jpg
Definitely a picture of the creature, but definitely not a Wikipedia webpage. So no source, nor a proper license. Q T C 03:07, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:IDog black.jpg
Definitely a picture of the creature, but definitely not a Wikipedia webpage. So no source, nor a proper license. Q T C 03:07, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:IDog amp'd.jpg
Definitely a picture of the creature, but definitely not a Wikipedia webpage. So no source, nor a proper license. Q T C 03:07, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:IDog amp'd 2.jpg
Definitely a picture of the creature, but definitely not a Wikipedia webpage. So no source, nor a proper license. Q T C 03:07, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:ICat wering clothing.jpg
Definitely a picture of the creature, but definitely not a Wikipedia webpage. So no source, nor a proper license. Q T C 03:08, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:ICat red.jpg
Definitely a picture of the creature, but definitely not a Wikipedia webpage. So no source, nor a proper license. Q T C 03:08, 16 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Those could probably be speedied per CSD:I7 (blatantly false image tag). Stifle (talk) 12:47, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I have speedily deleted all the iDog etc. files the user has uploaded as copyright violation (they seem to have come from the official iDog website), with the exception of File:ICat red.jpg, which has just be marked as "no copyright status" - it conceivably could have been taken by the uploader. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 21:56, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * If File:ICat red.jpg was taken by the uploaded, why the crude red on the sides and why no EXIF information? I suspect he just modified someone else's image he found somewhere on the net. Eeekster (talk) 03:00, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't dispute that (after all, I said that it conceivably could have been taken by the uploader, not that I believe that it is the case). In fact, I asked him - twice - where he got the photo, but so far he didn't respond. (But he did upload a number of images to the Commons, which I have nominated for deletion.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 20:06, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Mt-sinai-logo-117x117.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:28, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Unlicensed image; has been nine days since warning. ←Signed:→ Mr. E. Sánchez  Get to know me! / Talk to me! ←at≈:→ 09:00, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Stifle (talk) 10:33, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Monteverdi 450 SS.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:28, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Original image can be found here. This image was also uploaded to Commons and. See that discussion for more info. roguegeek (talk·cont) 19:37, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Deleted as a copyright violation. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 17:04, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

All images tagged with Template:Wikipedia screenshot

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep; for now- F ASTILY  (TALK) 01:51, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

The GPL and the GFDL are incompatible. ViperSnake151 23:17, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Irrespective of whether it creates a copyright issue or not (and I think it doesn't), I don't think it's appropriate to consider that here. I would recommend taking this up at WP:AN. Stifle (talk) 10:32, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.