Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 December 26



File:All saints dale city.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

orphaned, text over picture indicates may be (c) violation, no source provided, else UE due to text Skier Dude  ( talk ) 02:04, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:22811115@N00.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear, no source given, if corporate logo would not be CC Skier Dude  ( talk ) 05:13, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Alavío copia.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

claims to be logo for Grupo Alavio, if so, group would be (c) holder and not CC Skier Dude  ( talk ) 05:21, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Artraffle.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

orphaned, if it is a (c) logo it would not be CC as claimed Skier Dude  ( talk ) 05:28, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Bsilogo web.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

orphaned, claims to be Bioinformatics Solutions logo, thus most likely not CC Skier Dude  ( talk ) 05:40, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Community Shield.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

appears to be civic/corporate logo, thus not uploader (c) holder Skier Dude  ( talk ) 05:51, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Conddemo1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:22, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

orphaned, summary states "We own copyright for this image" and then uses GNU free license Skier Dude  ( talk ) 05:52, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


 * please delete this file. it is not needed. Mojowibble (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 14:35, 31 December 2008 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sa1explodedviewlistdatekb6.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Image looks like taken from a manual or similar copyrighted document. DavidDCM (talk) 10:12, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Neg02a.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:24, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Looks like promophoto. Uploader has a l ot of questionable uploads. Rettetast (talk) 10:34, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Kathykelly1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Unclear source. who creted the imge Rettetast (talk) 10:34, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:12dec2008 pic20.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Obviously taken from the stage, no meta-data. I suspect this image was taken from elsewhere. J Milburn (talk) 13:14, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:12dec1308 pic23.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Low resolution, no meta-data, uploaded with a batch of other suspicious images. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn (talk) 13:17, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:12dec2008 pic19.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Low resolution, no meta-data. I suspect this image was taken from elsewhere. J Milburn (talk) 13:20, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Various P. Miller photos by "Godigital"

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Deleted- F ASTILY  (TALK) 01:46, 26 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:MasterP-Headshot.jpg
 * File:Pmiller-onwhite.jpg (appears to be a crop of this image included in a press released available in various places)
 * File:PercyMiller 2008.jpg (also used in a press release)

Now granded going by the username and rater single minded edit history the uploader may have some relation to the subject. However despite beeing asked to clearify the situation in July and schores of other deleted images the user have still not provided any information or statements to verify that he is the copyright holder of these photos. Furthermore one of the images have "Non-commercial use only" written in the description pluss it appears the images have been uploaded and deleted several times in the past so it's far from obvious that the uploader understands the implications of the choosen license. --Sherool (talk) 23:53, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: I just deleted the 2nd of these from commons (thanks for the heads up Sherool). -mattbuck (Talk) 00:47, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.