Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 February 10



Image:719.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:29, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence permission was granted to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 01:22, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:768_N_of_Beach_copy.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:29, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence Lorne Resnick granted release of the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 02:12, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Wes anderson.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:29, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

It's been tagged on Flickr as Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0 Generic, not as CC attribution-sharealike Yamanbaiia(free hugs!) 02:26, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:95354.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:29, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence permission was granted to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 02:54, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:A-jodl2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:29, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Source is probably copyrighted Nv8200p talk 03:22, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Zerowarren.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:29, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Listed as public domain but same image is as Image:Zero (Albummed Cover).jpg and Image:Prosractination-Zero.jpg as copyrighted. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:28, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:CripsPOB.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:29, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence that this image has been released into the public domain B (talk) 04:58, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Tasc0 It's a zero! 05:09, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Do not delete this image. This is the only image I have seen of the gang members, or how the look like. and is used to serve as as example to serve the public community —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.146.215.211 (talk) 19:01, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Reverend X (talk) 18:11, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

I would keep it and tag it as fair use. —Remember the dot (talk) 23:13, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:RougeShip.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.- F ASTILY  (TALK) 22:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

uploader does not establish proof of holding the copyright to the book cover Rockfang (talk) 05:08, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ Kept as fair use. —Remember the dot (talk) 21:26, 4 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:29, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:A6095-3.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:29, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence of permission from copyright holder to release image under the GFDL. Summary says for education purposes only which is incompatible with a free license. Nv8200p talk 06:00, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:A6601-17.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:29, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence of permission from copyright holder to release image under the GFDL. Summary says for education purposes only which is incompatible with a free license. Nv8200p talk 06:01, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:A7687-8.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:29, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence of permission from copyright holder to release image under the GFDL. Summary says for education purposes, which is incompatible with a free license. Nv8200p talk 06:02, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Armidale Class Patrol Boat.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:29, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

See here — Sarcasticidealist (talk) 09:35, 10 February 2008 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:UathesisExample.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:29, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Contradictory copyright info; claims to be both copyrighted as a logo, and uncopyrightable as containing common property. Since I see a big logo on it, I doubt the latter is true. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 16:33, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I can add comment here. The picture is generated using a freely available class file using the open source LaTeX typesetting langauge.. It is an example cover page rendered as a pdf. Any copyright issues for the low resolution logo itself should be treated similarly  to the image Image:University_of_Auckland_crest.png in the  University of Auckland article. --Zven (talk) 06:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I do not know how to close these kind of discussions, but I am speedy deleting WP:CSD it as orphan image that was only used in a deleted article. The logo on it required that it be used in an article. JERRY talk contribs 03:33, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:SharpDevelop.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:29, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Not really a free images, all buttoms (and other tools) aren't under any free license OsamaK 17:41, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ Kept. SharpDevelop is licensed under the GNU Lesser General Public License, making it free software. —Remember the dot (talk) 07:50, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * You know that, All AWB's screenshots on Wikimedia Commons was deleted for this reason. I think this is right, all Windows buttons and textboxes and others aren't under GPL (We can't add GPL in a mixed image).--OsamaK 15:38, 25 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The Windows buttons and textboxes are so minor I don't think they're copyrightable. See Image:AWB.jpg for example. —Remember the dot (talk) 19:26, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:TamilnetTV Logo.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:29, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

This is a logo of Tamilnet and is being used as a logo of another website that is a blog and an attack site called www.tamilnet.tv. Currently this logo is not being used in any articles either. Watchdogb (talk) 19:27, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy deleted WP:CSD. JERRY talk contribs 03:39, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.