Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 January 10



Image:Wrsc01.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence of PD-release in the source. Rettetast (talk) 11:10, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Wrsc09.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence of PD-release in the source. Rettetast (talk) 11:10, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Eamonn holmes.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I8 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Claims to have subjects permission but no permission appears. Also uploader has had a number of these claims disputed Quentin X (talk) 12:10, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

If there is to be put a copyright on images that are going to be put onto wikipedia it means that noone will be able to see these pictures as noone will want to pay to put them onto this site oh dear Please don't put a copyright on images as i will get upset :( —Preceding unsigned comment added by LeeEvansLegend!! (talk • contribs) 14:33, 5 March 2009 (UTC) It appears that I have upset Quentin X and he/she is now pursuing a vendata against my contributuions. Perhaps if he would like to read the page you might discover that the permission was granted from the management company and the artist his/her self. I have no intention of running to them for them to sign autographed letters for some petty sceptics who have nothing better to do than call people liars. Delete them if you wish I am doing this for the artists free gratis at thier request and I am tired of all the petty people who seem to think that everything is a lie and all people are liars. It will not be my loss it will be Wikipedias loss Austenlennon (talk) 01:04, 10 January 2008 (UTC)austenlennon  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Austenlennon (talk • contribs)
 * Image kept -Nv8200p talk 19:23, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep--Theosony (talk) 12:52, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Nuala mckeever.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No proof as to how uploader has copyright Quentin X (talk) 12:16, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps if you would like to read the page you might discover that the permission was granted from the management company and the artist his/her self. I have no intention of running to them for them to sign autohgraphed letters for some petty sceptics who have nothing better to do than call people liars. Delete them if you wish I am doing this for the artists free gratis at thier request and I am tired of all the petty people who seem to think that everything is a lie and all people are liars. It will not be my loss it will be Wikipedias loss Austenlennon (talk) 19:27, 10 January 2008 (UTC)austenlennon
 * Image kept -Nv8200p talk 19:24, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:MichaelMcDowell.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence of CC license in the source Rettetast (talk) 12:28, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:MichealMartin.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence of CC license in the source Rettetast (talk) 12:29, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Adrianne_non_copy.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No verification given that Curry, the presumed copyright holder, has released this image under the GFDL. Also, the source website is a broken link. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 14:35, 10 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Adrianne Curry personally gave me permission to release this picture. Any question of it being an unfree image you can contact me directly.  There is no URL to the picture because it does not exist anywhere but here.  User:dmckeehan
 * Please forward Curry's permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org so that it can be verified by an WP:OTRS volunteer. Without corroboration, this image appears to be in violation of copyright. Thanks ˉˉanetode╦╩ 05:25, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:P0055av_Ring.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Unlikely that uploader is copyright holder Rettetast (talk) 15:22, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The artist was the uploader, the painting is in the collection of MoMA but RD has the copyright. I'm removing the tag. I have personally spoken with the artist. Modernist (talk) 00:35, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Image kept -Nv8200p talk 19:35, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:FSSP 1d.pdf

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Unclear which article this pdf diagram is for. No sourcing available. Breno talk 15:56, 10 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I intended to use this image for "Firing squad synchronization problem" article, but I didn't use it. So I don't mind if it is deleted. I uploaded and used FSSP_1d1.png instead. I created both images myself, but to be completly honest, I was inspired by similar image in (Mazoyer, Jacques (1987). "A six-state minimal time solution to the firing squad synchronization problem". Theoretical Computer Science 50: 183--238). (Mjancuska (talk) 21:38, 10 January 2008 (UTC))
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:LPT.pdf

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Unclear which article this PDF scanned text is for. No sourcing available. Breno talk 16:01, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Closing as RSD instead (no licencing info). --Breno talk 17:00, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Special.pdf

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Unclear which article this PDF scanned text is for. No sourcing available. Breno talk 16:01, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Closing as RSD instead (no licencing info). --Breno talk 17:00, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Australian Six-Sided Uckers Board.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Photos of games are considered to be derivative works, and hence copyrighted. Breno talk 16:28, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Uckers is not actually copyrighted, as it is a game made up by sailors going back hundreds of years. I am actully in the Royal Australian Navy and so can testify. It is my photo of my board that I myself made. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.217.5.131 (talk) 05:08, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Image kept -Nv8200p talk 21:08, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:StoneRich© Studio Logo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Appears to be copyrighted, particularly since the filename has a copyright symbol in it! — Travis talk  16:49, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * This image Image:MSK.jpg is from the same user, which is the studio's name who wrote an article about the studio and put these two images in it which were up for speedy. If the article gets deleted, these images should as well. MECU ≈ talk 18:37, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:1.pdf

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: File does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Unsure what scanned PDF text is for. Pretty much unsalvagable content. Are people posting scanned PDFs into Wikipedia in order to get search engine hits? --Breno talk 17:13, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Commons showing through -Nv8200p talk 02:34, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Desk2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G12 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence on the website that this is a free image -- lucasbfr  talk 18:19, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Velvet dvorit.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Looks like an image taken from the press and likely not actually GFDL. The uploader User:Marina T. has a history of disregarding proper licensing. — Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 23:15, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.