Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 January 11



Image:Ded squash lrg.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was:

Not specifically a CC licence. When reading their licence, the company does not allow commercial use to create derivative works. Breno talk 01:49, 11 January 2008 (UTC)


 * That's not how I'd interpret the licence: Both commercial and non-commercial uses and derivative uses are specifically allowed, but attribution must only be kept for commercial uses. This seems to be a specific exemption for fan wallpapers, and desktops to be able to remove the watermark. There's nothing in that wording which would preclude wikipedia inclusion, especially since - precluding the above, the entire site is under a blanket CC70.52.182.154 (talk) 04:45, 11 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I dropped an e-mail to the info address on the site asking for clarification of the above. I haven't heard back from them yet, but the "press images" page has been changed and all content is now specifically released under a Creative Commons 2.5 attribution licence, which is clearly free enough per WP policy, so I assume someone there read my e-mail. 70.52.182.154 (talk) 01:22, 12 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Ok great yeah I kept an old copy/paste of the licence for reference:


 * The following photographs are available for commercial and non-commercial uses provided that the copyright information is kept intact and Deadenddays.com or Rocket Ace Moving Pictures is somehow attributed. For Non-commercial use only (fan created wallpaper... etc) the copyright information may be altered (reduced, design changed) provided that the finished work is freely distributed and a copy is sent to info@deadenddays.com


 * I think what happened is that I missed the full stop when reading through the text the first couple times. With a fresh look on it today, I see your point.


 * That aside, now that press photos are now licenced CC-by-2.5-ca it puts my concerns to rest and is far less complicated. Setting to resolved. --Breno talk 12:55, 12 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Asg_group01.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:35, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence uploader has permission to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 02:40, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:42850.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:35, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence uploader had permission to release under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 04:04, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Bill Murray making pizza Evanston Illinois 1971.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:35, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

"Commercial use requires permission" makes it non-free. Liftarn (talk) 08:48, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Ingame-1.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:35, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

The uploader is probably not the coyrightholder. Rettetast (talk) 10:21, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Chriselliott.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:35, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Incorrect licence (film); non-free image, used solely to identify a living person with no attempt to provide critical commentary on the program.  Dei z  talk 15:06, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:MS-townview-sw-tn.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was:

The description makes it sound the user got the image from the internet and might not be the the copyright holder of the work. --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 15:45, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Issue commented on by contributor here, and i believe him. --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 20:48, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Nimrod Kamer Asexual President for hertzliyya.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:35, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Confusing source information. Uploader has a history of disregard to proper licensing and has been blocked for that. Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 16:40, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:AlleyB 3.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:35, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

It looks like this image may have false info regarding authorship and/or copyright. The editor who uploaded it has few other edits. Their log shows two uploads of Image:AlleyB 2.jpg, which were deleted for bad fair use claims. The bad fair use claims were 14 October 2007 and 18 October 2007. Suddenly, on 23 October 2007 the editor remembers a photo s/he took? Somehow, I don't think so... Mdsummermsw (talk) 17:23, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Assuming good faith, I'm going to say this is not the same user. Other than that assumption, though... Mdsummermsw (talk) 17:33, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Kay_parker_taboo.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:35, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image appears to be a screen capture from the film Taboo. Uploader claims that they hold copyright and publish the image under the GFDL, though I personally doubt that they are in fact the copyright holder. thadius856talk 18:48, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Ottawa-Photographer.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:35, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

The photograph in the middle of this image is almost certainly not in the public domain. Now orphaned as article it was used in has been deleted for the second time today. LeSnail (talk) 21:23, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I have personally taken this photograph and I own a hard copy of it. Please contact me if you need me to send it to you. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.245.244.242 (talk) 20:14, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Image kept Incidental inclusion of copyrighted/trademarked material in a photo is generall okay. -Nv8200p talk 21:13, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.