Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 January 13



Image:Tribune flier 1941.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.- F ASTILY  (TALK) 22:48, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Copyright on UK images from an unknown creator expires after seventy years; the tag on this article had previously incorrectly stated that copyright expired after fifty years, but this is not the case. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Warofdreams (talk • contribs) 16:16, 13 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The Fair Use claim looks valid.--Prosfilaes (talk) 03:28, 14 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, this has now been resolved. Warofdreams talk 23:46, 14 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Ll.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Appears to have copyrighting and sourcing in image itself. —  pd_THOR  undefined | 05:40, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Eric Henderson-BioForce.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I3 by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Having an image in your "possession" does not mean you are the copyright holder. Chris.B (talk) 11:13, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Erniemerrick.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Promotional shot. Chris.B (talk) 11:18, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Esat.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Copyrighted logo. Chris.B (talk) 11:22, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Please see updated information on the logo as justification for its continuing use on wikipedia. This logo is no longer in use by its successor company and does not market nor trade. As a result the logo is clearly only shown for historical information purposes relevant to the article in which it appears.--  RÓNÁN   "Caint / Talk"  19:10, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Sam_Concepcion2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Source website does not confirm the PD status. bluemask (talk) 13:26, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Requested confirmation of copyright status from the Promotional Manager at the website. I will delete this image in two or three days if I do not get a response. -Nv8200p talk 22:13, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Sam_Concepcion.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Source website does not confirm the PD status. bluemask (talk) 13:28, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Requested confirmation of copyright status from the Promotional Manager at the website. I will delete this image in two or three days if I do not get a response. -Nv8200p talk 22:13, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:FirebackVHS.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Copyright does not go away because label is no more. Garion96 (talk) 14:09, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:FireFoxKidsLargeBanner.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Incorporates Internet Explorer logo, which is probably not legitimate for a freely licensed image. B (talk) 21:13, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Richard_Rose_1974.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:09, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

permission claimed, but no OTRS, see WP:COPYREQ MECU ≈ talk 22:14, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Requested confirmation of copyright status from User:Sharnish. I will delete this image in two or three days if I do not get a response. -Nv8200p talk 22:18, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

TEXT OF EMAIL:

From:  "Robert Cergol" < xxxxxx @ xxxxxxx.net>

To:   	

Subject:   	RE: Re: High-resolution photo of RR

Date:   	Sun, 25 Sep 2005 21:51:47 +0000

Hi Steve, Yes, that photo, and the one where he is smiling that I had framed for the funeral, were both part of a portrait sitting I did of Mr. Rose back in July, 1974. I have all of the original Kodachome slides. I would be happy to grant "free use" of both images. I suspect the difference between "public domain" and "free use" is, has to do with ownership versus ability to use, so I guess I would prefer the latter, just in case it allows me to retain some right to control negative use of the image that placing it in the public domain might not otherwise permit. The GNU stuff has a whole organization and website behind it that I don't have time to research and so don't want to mess with.

Bob

This is the communication from the author. Where do I put it? Thank you. Steve Harnish (talk) 16:14, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Image kept per communication from author. -Nv8200p talk 18:59, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:VCRolandRichardLouisBourkeGrave.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

permission claimed but no OTRS, see WP:COPYREQ MECU ≈ talk 22:21, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:PHetu.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

publicity photo under GFDL, no permission claimed, would probably be valid under fair use as subject has died MECU ≈ talk 22:23, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Akram_2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader removed PD-self unexplained. Jusjih (talk) 22:45, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.