Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 January 7

==== Image:Alicia_MiguelAlt9.jpg, Image:Alicia_MiguelAlt2.jpg, Image: Alicia MiguelAlt1.jpg, Image:Alicia MiguelAlt10.jpg, Image: Alicia MiguelAlt3.jpg, Image:Alicia MiguelAlt7.jpg Image: Alicia MiguelAlt4.jpg, Image: Alicia MiguelAlt5.jpg, Image: Alicia MiguelAlt8.jpg, Image: Alicia MiguelAlt11.jpg, Image: Alicia MiguelAlt6.jpg==== The uploader, CathyJFuller, says the images were downloaded from www.aliciamiguel.com, so I doubt that CathyJFuller is the copyright holder, and hence is in no position to release the image copyright. Addhoc (talk) 00:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * All deleted per I9 & G5. These were uploaded by a serial hoaxer and sockpuppeteer . These images have been uploaded many times under many filenames, if you ever run across them again please don't hesitate to delete on sight and block the uploader. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 15:36, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:EmilyTyndall.jpg
no indication that uploader owns the copyright, previously uploaded as non-free promotional ˉˉanetode╦╩ 02:17, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I thought Girldisney was Emily Tyndall and so they put a tag on it that it was them and that's all there is to it. I'm not sure how else they should tag it.  Then again that user has just vanished since "1 August 2007" so they won't be able to explain. William Ortiz (talk) 02:23, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi this is Girldisney, aka Emily Tyndall. Yes, I would like to upload a photo and yes I own the copyright. How should I label it so that it does not get deleted anymore? Thank you. Emily Tyndall (talk) 07:50, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:NewJol.jpg
Don't believe the source, and it has been added to several irrelevant articles; it's an appallingly bad image anyway.  Rodhullandemu  (Talk) 15:43, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Uploader now blocked as a vandalism-only account -- Rodhullandemu  (Talk) 16:07, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Jcale.jpg
Uploader has history of vandalism, this image is unused, and I don't believe the copyright notice.  Rodhullandemu  (Talk) 15:55, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Uploader now blocked as a vandalism-only account -- Rodhullandemu  (Talk) 16:08, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Fersureremix.jpg
Cover art of a single, listed under GFDL/public domain. Last I checked, most single art was copyrighted... Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 18:56, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Moonlight booking.jpg
Promotional image for apparently non-notable band. Released under PD but I doubt that. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 18:57, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Badintentions.jpg
Copyrighted album cover, placed under GFDL. Uploader's comment "I got this picture off of my photobucket album so I don't think it should be deleted" indicates a possible misunderstanding of copyright. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:06, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Discussion should be closed since it has correct licensing now. Rappingwonders (talk) 14:22, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Riseoftheundead.jpg
I'm pretty sure that album covers aren't GFDL. User has history of misinterpreting copyrights. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:18, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Gonealbum.jpg
Copyrighted album cover uploaded under GFDL. Also, the article it's used in is currently at AfD. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:19, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Starttodaygorillabiscuits.jpg
Copyrighted album cover uploaded under GFDL. User has uploaded other copyrighted material under GFDL as well, and is very unlikely to be the copyright holder. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:20, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ correct lisc. & fair use added. SkierRMH  ( talk ) 19:41, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Droid3logo.jpg
Looks like a promotional image. Yet another copyright image claimed to be GFDL. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:21, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Earl_Bennett.jpg
Permission claimed but limitations on claim including "may not be sold", no OTRS, see WP:COPYREQ MECU ≈ talk 20:13, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I got permission directly from the copyright holder to use this image. What more do you want? Wpride33 (talk) 18:39, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Disclaimer was not consistent with the requirements for a free content license. Deleted per WP:CSD (non-commercial use only/Wikipedia permission only). If the copyright holder agrees to allow unlimited modification and commercial distribution by third parties, this image may be undeleted. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 00:11, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Remedial_works.jpg
Uploader blanked GFDL unexplained. Jusjih (talk) 20:41, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Uploader relicensed it as PD-self. I am withdrawing it unless anyone else has something else to say.--Jusjih (talk) 02:17, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Logo-theory.jpg
The logo from the external source does not appear to be self-licenses that is now removed by uploader. Jusjih (talk) 20:43, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Sew-in-hair-weave.jpg
See previous discussion at. – Quadell (talk) (random) 21:24, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * And see the discussion at User talk:Daphnekraus about the links she added. I expect that the uploader is the copyright-holder, but I'm not sure. – Quadell (talk) (random) 21:26, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Image deleted. A free image with unambiguous source could be created. -Nv8200p talk 03:04, 6 February 2008 (UTC)