Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 July 14



Image:MurrayHighSchool(Utah)2003UploadedbyYour1727.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

 Mosmof (talk) 00:03, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Malcolmxmartinlutherking.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No copyright information provided at source; no evidence of public domain-release. —  pd_THOR  undefined | 01:28, 14 July 2008 (UTC)


 * According to the uploader, this is the source of the photo. It cites this page as its source. The "original source" has information about its sources; it's clearly not the copyright holder, but it doesn't say who is.


 * I've tried to find copyright information, but the photo was taken after a press conference and there are at least a dozen variations, from slightly different angles with different facial expressions. The "original source" shows two of them.


 * I'll keep looking for copyright information for this specific photo, or for a similar photo that has no copyright restrictions. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 02:17, 14 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I've found the photo in two books, The Judas Factor: The Plot to Kill Malcolm X and Malcolm X: The Great Photographs, and both credit it to AP/World Wide.


 * The use of the photo in some articles might be okay under a historic image rationale, but it can't be used as a free image. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 07:03, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I concur that the image should not be deleted but that Non-free historic image templates should be applied. I note at least two articles have non free rationales already on th image page.  The image should be removed from other articles where rationales have not been provided.  Deletion would not in my view be appropriate given that rationales have been provided.  If there is a dispute about the rationales then that argument should be mounted separately but I think they are both significant figures - a photo of them together is significant and in the right article (or articles but not too many) use of the image makes sense.  The image  probably doesn't need to be in the article Black people.--Matilda talk 21:12, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * You might want to comment at Images and media for deletion/2008 July 24. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 23:55, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Caesars Windsor offering las vegas acts.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Would this count as freedom of panorama or not, cause this is being specifically used to show the sign. — ViperSnake151 03:14, 14 July 2008 (UTC).
 * I think it would count as freedom of panorama. Despite the overly specific caption (which I am going to change), the real intent of this photograph seems to be to illustrate the Marquee of the hotel/casino. What is on the Marquee is really incidental. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:50, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:HalilBerktay.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

The originating Web site is dead, and I doubt they had the right in the first place. Good time to re-establish ownership. Adoniscik(t, c) 04:20, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Robin-williams-uso07-1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Source (a commercial site) doesn't say who the author of this photo is. Kelly hi! 06:18, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Wolfh.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Unlikely that uploader is the copyright holder. Brianga (talk) 12:13, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:KCSM Auto Rail Car.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

The page listed as a source shows the image with a copyright notice on it. Pages above this image in that webspace don't show anything listing either GFDL or public domain which is asserted by the uploader. -- Slambo (Speak) 13:11, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:TFM Locomotive at Meridian.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

The page that is listed as a source does not make any mention of the image copyright, pages above it in that webspace imply that the images linked therein are not licensed as the uploader asserts. — Slambo (Speak) 13:14, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Michael R. Haverty.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No copyright details listed at all by the uploader; the two other images uploaded from the same login also have questionable copyright status. — Slambo (Speak) 13:16, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:AMAZONAS.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Megapixie (talk) 14:46, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Found URL that the image is from so nominated for speedy deletion as clear copyvio. (http://misscontest.blogspot.com/2008/03/dayana-mendoza-miss-venezuela-2007.html) Anonymous101 (talk) 15:42, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * To be fair, the blog page you cite was posted in March 2008, and the image was originally loaded back in September, so it could be that the blog pulled Wikimedia's image. No other comment at this time. --Ali'i 16:22, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I deleted this one from the Commons. Admins may want to take the reasoning from that deletion request into account. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 21:03, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.