Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 July 6



Image:MacedoniaForeverposterSkopje.jpg
Image went from a non-free content image to a public domain image after it was tagged for having no rationale. Garion96 (talk) 00:10, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:DemiLovato.jpg
It is unlikely that the fansite gallery that is cited as the source actually owns the copyright to this image. http://www.demi-lovato.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=30&pos=19 Save-Me-Oprah (talk)  13:13, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:SingaporeA380 9V-SKC.JPG
This image was listed at WP:CP on June 20, 2008, here, with the stated rationale that "The image might be a possible copyvio due to the extremely grainy image quality which I have strong reasons to believe that it was captured from a video camera or possibly a television program." The uploader was appropriately notified, but has not edited since notification. Since no source is provided, I bring this here, as I believe this is a more appropriate forum for evaluating this concern. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:23, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I would agree it is a photograph from a video screen, if you look at the high resolution copy you can see the screen matrix and white spot reflection probably from the autofocus on the digital camera used. MilborneOne (talk) 20:51, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Could also have been taken from behind a tinted window. Errr...tinted isn't the correct term.  Newer large windows use a screen printing system to put either black blocking material on a window or external advertisements while still retaining some transparency.  Either way if it was taken from a video screen it was photographed (per the above), not directly captured. Protonk (talk) 20:39, 19 July 2008 (UTC)  The process, but not the application in detail, is discussed here. Protonk (talk) 20:44, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Kanako-moo.JPG
No evidence permission was granted to use the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 22:19, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Rasterbate Thomas Taylor Product.jpg
Derivative of copyrighted image — - SCEhard T 22:20, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Kapralova2.jpg
No evidence permission was granted to use image under the GFDL Nv8200p talk 22:25, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Upper Abkhazia village.jpg
This image was listed at WP:CP on May 22. At the heart of the dispute is whether the forum has the right to release the photo or whether the copyright belongs to the user who uploaded it. The uploader requested clarification in the comments section of the site but received no response. The matter is complicated in that the site is not English. Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:36, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Karmajude.jpg
A screenshot from a TV series indicates the uploader is probably not the copyright holder as claimed. Nv8200p talk 22:59, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Karmakyte.jpg
A screenshot from a TV series indicates the uploader is probably not the copyright holder as claimed. Nv8200p talk 23:01, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Karthik_new.jpg
Watermark indicates the uploader may not be the copyright holder as claimed. Nv8200p talk 23:06, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Katarina_Dalayman.jpg
No evidence permission was granted to use the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 23:13, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Kat_kw_001011.jpg
Watermark on the image indicates that the uploader is probably not the copyright holder as claimed. Nv8200p talk 23:16, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Katherine_Brooks_photo_shoot.jpeg
Summary indicates the uploader is probably not the copyright holder as claimed. Nv8200p talk 23:25, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:KathleenLonsdale.jpg
No evidence that permission was granted to use the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 23:31, 6 July 2008 (UTC)