Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 June 13



Image:Hare5.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence of public domain release by copyright holder as claimed. Kelly hi! 00:12, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The evidence is that the uploader was verifiably a senior manager of the League Against Cruel Sports (1,090 google references for "mike hobday" "league against cruel sports"-) and therefore able to legitimately authorise public domain release. MikeHobday (talk) 07:05, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Except that there's no evidence that you are the same Mike Hobday. To prove your identity, please send an email to permissions-en@undefinedwikimedia.org from a league.org.uk email address and be sure to include the link to the image. Thank you.  howcheng  {chat} 04:55, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm no longer employed by the League (since December 2007), so cannot do that. Can I suggest you look at, , , , and. I have been referred to (and sometimes been abused) all over Wikipedia for over two years as a League employee, while never denying it. My user page refers to my other role as a Parliamentary candidate and, if I am not the real Mike Hobday, then I suggest the real one would have complained to OTRS long ago. I respectfully suggest that the chances of my being a sleeper agent are nil. Thanks for asking, though! MikeHobday (talk) 06:13, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Permission confirmed . MikeHobday (talk) 16:38, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Now a candidate to be deleted as it is duplicated in commons ! MilborneOne (talk) 21:31, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Keep As per MikeHobday above.PJHaseldine (talk) 07:47, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete now image moved to Commons. MikeHobday (talk) 14:23, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:WALES_Edwinsford_2005_snared_cat.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence of GFDL license as claimed. Kelly hi! 00:14, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The evidence is that the uploader was verifiably a senior manager of the League Against Cruel Sports (1,090 google references for "mike hobday" "league against cruel sports") and therefore able to legitimately license release. MikeHobday (talk) 07:05, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Permission confirmed . MikeHobday (talk) 16:39, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Keep As per MikeHobday above.PJHaseldine (talk) 07:47, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete now image moved to Commons. MikeHobday (talk) 14:23, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Hunting_Act.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

Derivative work of Crown Copyright. Kelly hi! 00:16, 13 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Query whether a photograph of a document in the public domain is clearly defined in Wikipedia policy as being derivative. MikeHobday (talk) 07:16, 13 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The coat of arms is likely in the public domain. I'm doubtful if the rest of stuff in the image is sufficient for creative input. I'm dubious about the general encyclopedic value of the image, but that is an issue for IfD. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:51, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Keep Image is purely illustrative and fully encyclopedic in the two articles Hunting Act 2004 and Fox hunting legislation.PJHaseldine (talk) 10:37, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Deleted The Royal coat of arms is copyrighted. BJ Talk 21:25, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:KolkatainIndia_2.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence of PD status for original map. Kelly hi! 00:34, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Franklin_Fox.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Derivative of a copyrighted character. Kelly hi! 02:29, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Bacolod-Silay City International Airport.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

The image is tagged as free, but despite contacting the user, no evidence that it is free has been located. I am bringing here rather than just deleting as other images that this user uploaded have been free. J Milburn (talk) 17:32, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Source link posted was incorrect. The image source is here; it is fully copyrighted.  The image was already orphaned. Xeltran (talk) 08:54, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Wolf Armoured Vehicle.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Tag is up for TFD because there is no basis that Israeli Defence Force images are PD. Taking to PUI just to be on the safe side. ViperSnake151 20:02, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Israeli air force 160 squadron helicopters.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Tag is up for TFD because there is no basis that Israeli Defence Force images are PD. Taking to PUI just to be on the safe side. Also, YOU DON'T NEED FAIR USE RATIONALES FOR CLAIMED FREE IMAGES...but soon you may just need one. ViperSnake151 20:03, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Irivere100.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

looks like a promotional image Samuell Lift me up or put me down 21:09, 13 June 2008 (UTC)


 * agree - slightly larger version at is a promotional image. If uploader was originator why upload only a thumbnail when a 985 x 489 version is available! MilborneOne (talk) 19:11, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Emmett Good Faith Cover.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Incorrect tagging and false claim of ownership of an album cover. No proper source given and no fair-use rationale given Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 23:15, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.