Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 June 3



Image:Wikipedia passport.png
 The Transhumanist 21:51, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Listed for speedy deletion on Commons - Kevin (talk) 01:01, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Interlingual Barnstar-small2.png
 The Transhumanist 21:16, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Interlingual Barnstar-small.png
 The Transhumanist 21:13, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Interlingual Barnstar.png
 The Transhumanist 21:09, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I made this image and I don't know what the rules are about using a copyrighted image and changing it. Does the new image then belong to me? How much does something have to be changed to make it different enough from the copyrighted image that it isn't an issue anymore?--Silversmith Hewwo 00:49, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
 * See Sample (music) and Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Dimension Films. Basically, where any potential copyright case is concerned, imagine the judge you would be brought in front of as an old one-eyed Pakistani guy with a two foot beard who has spent all his life sitting under a tree rocking back and forth chanting verses from the Qur'an except for the occasional legal case where someone has got his attention long enough for him to point his finger and yell "Death!", and you have a good idea of the American legal system. Wnt (talk) 19:18, 11 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Listed for deletion on Commons Kevin (talk) 01:06, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Blue_Marble_Puzzle_Globe_in_stand_with_passport.png
Wikipedia != source - Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:43, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * it has come to my attention that an image this is derived from appears to be a derivation of a copyrighted image from a commercial retail website
 * The Transhumanist 21:27, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:300px-National_Nine_News_2008.png
Clearly LOGO Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:44, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:National_Nine_News_2008.png
Clearly Logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:45, 3 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Looks like something that should be tagged with PD-ineligible. -- Ned Scott 10:23, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Shreky.jpg
Clearely not a PD-Self. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:49, 3 June 2008 (UTC)


 * It would be OK as fair use though. Kevin (talk) 01:09, 24 June 2008 (UTC)\
 * Kept and FUR added. BJ Talk 08:54, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Fifiona.jpg
Clearly not PD-self Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:53, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Kept and FUR added. BJ Talk 08:54, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Pussyboots.jpg
Clearly not pd-self Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:54, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Kept and FUR added. (source missing) BJ Talk 08:54, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Lipovo_from_space.jpg
Unsourced - Is it feasible uploader has access to arieal photo imagery? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:56, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:MrsDoubtfireMovieP.jpg
Clearly not Pd-Self - Movie poster Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:57, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Retag with Non-free video cover, as (nearly) all film posters and home media covers are protected by copyright. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 16:45, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Fel_Sala_1.jpg
No evidence given to support GFDL claim Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:00, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Fel_sala_1.jpg
No evidence to support GFDL claim, Permission claim but no OTRS ref Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:00, 3 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was Debate at Possibly unfree images/2008 June 10 BJ Talk 10:50, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Al-khatib.jpg
Source website clearly says all rights reserved, no evidence of the CC license. Polly (Parrot) 13:44, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

)
 * The photo was taken from the Syrianhistory.com website of Sami Mubayyed. Other photos have been taken from the website before with consent of Sami (see this one for example, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Hashim_Atassi_Inauguration_1936.jpg). And the same goes for the rest of the photos that you tagged. Yazan (talk) 13:48, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * That one's public domain so is fine. Polly (Parrot) 13:49, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * If the one's you uploaded are public domain in Syria, then you should alter the licensing to reflect that. Polly (Parrot) 13:52, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * But it was published on Wikipedia first. I'm sorry, I might not get this well yet, what exactly should I do in this case?Yazan (talk) 13:53, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I tried adding the Public Domain template to the photo license but it didn't work (
 * . Yazan (talk) 13:55, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

One other thing, why does the PD template works on that photo but doesnt work with the rest? Thanx Polly. Yazan (talk) 15:30, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I emailed Sami Mubayed again about the photos and he assured me that i have full permission to use them on wikipedia under a CC license. Can I remove the "possibly unfree image" tags?
 * See also Possibly unfree images/2008 June 10.  howcheng  {chat} 00:25, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Noureddinatassi.jpg
Source website clearly says all rights reserved, no evidence of the CC license. <b style="color:green;">Polly</b> (<b style="color:red;">Parrot</b>) 13:45, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Al-kasm.jpg
Source website clearly says all rights reserved, no evidence of the CC license <b style="color:green;">Polly</b> (<b style="color:red;">Parrot</b>) 13:46, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Khoury-UNSC.jpg
Source website clearly says all rights reserved, no evidence of the CC license <b style="color:green;">Polly</b> (<b style="color:red;">Parrot</b>) 13:46, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Fares al-Khoury1.jpg
Source website clearly says all rights reserved, no evidence of the CC license <b style="color:green;">Polly</b> (<b style="color:red;">Parrot</b>) 13:46, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Shishakli 1.jpg
Source website clearly says all rights reserved, no evidence of the CC license <b style="color:green;">Polly</b> (<b style="color:red;">Parrot</b>) 13:47, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Khalid al-azm.jpg
Source website clearly says all rights reserved, no evidence of the CC license <b style="color:green;">Polly</b> (<b style="color:red;">Parrot</b>) 13:47, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Nazim al-Kudsi.jpg
Source website clearly says all rights reserved, no evidence of the CC license <b style="color:green;">Polly</b> (<b style="color:red;">Parrot</b>) 13:47, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Al-ayyubi.jpg
Source website clearly says all rights reserved, no evidence of the CC license <b style="color:green;">Polly</b> (<b style="color:red;">Parrot</b>) 13:48, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:CCF Flag CGGS.jpg
How can a logo coined in 1856 be GFDL?? — <b style="color:forestgreen">Happy</b>‑<b style="color:darkorange">melon</b> 18:26, 3 June 2008 (UTC).

Image:Muhammed Faris, First Syrian Space.jpg
No source given, wrongly subst'd license reason, probably a FU replaceable since it is of a living person.  MBisanz  talk 20:13, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

Image:Wbepic.gif
There are two issues with this image. First, this image does not add anything to the article in which it is used which could not also be expressed (and in a more accessible fashion) in plain text. Second, the image contains likely unfree clip art for which no source or licensing information has been provided. KurtRaschke (talk) 22:17, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - I beleive it's a matter of opinion as to whether the image adds value or not. I have been careful for reasons of accessibility to include the information in writing as well as in the picture.  However it is much easier for a user to see and digest the flow of interactions in a diagramatic form than in a bulleted list.   I have just checked the licensing terms of the clip art i used (in microsoft word) which states that it can be used in the creation of websites.  I agree however that I need to list it's source with the image, and so I will do so. Your first point could be valid (depends on the consensus on this) but your second point shouldn't be valid once I have added this info.  Cheers  James  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jtq4u (talk • contribs) 08:33, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Suggest it could be easily re-worked without the clip art and still serve the same purpose. Although can a created image of this sort be original research! MilborneOne (talk) 16:52, 5 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment Do we have any evidence that the clipart is non-free? -- Ned Scott 10:26, 10 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep The diagram does add value to the article. The article itself was AFDed.  The close was disputed but I have arranged usefication rather than going to the trouble of DRV. Colonel Warden (talk) 15:00, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - According to the section of the license agreement cited on the image description page, the clip art is licensed for commercial use (specifying websites and software, although I believe it's reasonable to include printed material under the "websites" criteria since, well, you can print a website), derivative works, and further distribution--unless I'm missing something, there's actually no attribution requirement, which makes this license even more liberal than the cc-by-3.0 often used by the Wikimedia foundation for licenses. While attribution would probably be the more appropriate, this clearly qualifies as "free" content for the purposes of Wikipedia. -- jonny - m  t  01:52, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * It still sounds like it might only be valid for things directly involving the user who owns the program. *shrug*. -- Ned Scott 03:46, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Ike.jpg
This is a different image than what was licensed as public domain. It looks like a video game character so likely copyrighted and orphaned. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:52, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete the hell is that public domain :D <b style="color:forestgreen">Happy</b>‑<b style="color:darkorange">melon</b> 11:03, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Tagged at as CSD I9 as copyvio of Copyright © 2008, Gametrailers Corp. All Rights Reserved. MilborneOne (talk) 17:58, 4 June 2008 (UTC)