Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 May 22



Image:Rosesofeyam2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I3 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

derivative work. Rettetast (talk) 01:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Kano rapper.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image not found at given source...photos by that Flickr uploader are licensed as "all rights reserved". Kelly hi! 01:42, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Keep of Kalessin.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I5 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

 Littlegiant22 (talk) 02:26, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Nuribilgeceylan.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I3 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No proof that this image has been released into the public domain by owner. Described as being "distributed for use for publicity matters" — 59.189.42.56 (talk) 02:28, 22 May 2008 (UTC).


 * Note-Dsmurat has uploaded the image under the same name on 25 May, 2008 to the wikimedia commons, as a transfer claiming the same public domain as the original uploader on en:wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.189.42.56 (talk) 21:24, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Free the POW's Mural Belfast.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: kept with amended license Skier Dude  ( talk ) 01:52, 26 February 2012 (UTC) Item is claimed as free under Section 62 (the UK freedom of panorama clause). However, that applies to "works of artistic craftsmanship", not "graphic works" such as murals or paintings. See this section of the FOP explanation at Commons. The item should be tagged with Non-free 2D art and have a fair use rationale. Kelly hi! 07:28, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Not sure what's going on here, but the image was correctly tagged and sourced until you changed it. It is a CC 2.0 attribution licence, check the Flickr page. Stu   ’Bout ye!  11:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The only change I made to the photo license was to change it from cc-by-sa-2.0 (which was incorrect) to cc-by-2.0 per the Flickr page. My question isn't about the copyright on the photo itself, it's about the copyright on the mural of which the photo is a derivative work. Kelly  hi! 12:15, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Jesus, it's not like we're talking about a Damien Hirst painting - it is a mural on a gable wall in west Belfast. Are all mural photos to be tagged then? You should look at the Northern Irish murals page. Not to mention Banksy's article. Stu   ’Bout ye!  21:00, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll take a look at them tonight. I also raised a question at the Commons Village Pump here if anyone would like to join that discussion. Kelly  hi! 21:19, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * See this entry in the casebook at Commons. Basically, murals are considered unfree, while grafitti is generally not considered eligible for a copyright claim. Since this image doesn't appear to be of illegal grafitti (it looks like the side of a private residence), I'd say it looks like a legal mural. Kelly  hi! 15:41, 23 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Kept, image also contains architectural features. Gwen Gale (talk) 19:26, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * How does that impact the copyright status? The focus of the photo is obviously the artwork, not any architectural elements. Kelly  hi! 19:51, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Oops. Our documentation asserts that there is an odd quirk in UK law having to do with murals in public places. This is unlike most other laws in Europe. Moreover, I'd never want to be the one to say what's graffiti and what's a mural. In truth, the "mural interpretation" on commons may be mistaken but that's what I have to go by. I don't see any fair use rationale to keep this picture and am now willing to delete it, not under UK law maybe, but under Commons policy. Gwen Gale (talk) 20:21, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't think it needs to be deleted, but it should be licensed as non-free 2D art and have a use rationale. I'll do so now and remove the PUI tag. Kelly  hi! 17:25, 31 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Stifle (talk) 10:50, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Anime158.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Obviously non-free image of licensed, copyrighted character; uploader falsely claiming it as their own work -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 12:51, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:JulianHorn-Smith.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

no evidence of public domain Rettetast (talk) 15:46, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:BOK Center-BothRenditions.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Unable to determine whether these images were released into the public domain. Kelly hi! 20:22, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.