Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 May 30



Image:Robert_J._Smith_II.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

New Jersey does not release its work into the public domain. Kelly hi! 01:14, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Robert_Lewis_Morgan.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

New Jersey does not release its work into the public domain. Kelly hi! 01:45, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Robert-oppenheimer_image002.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence of PD status. Kelly hi! 01:49, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:RobertSinger.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

New Jersey does not release its work into the public domain. Kelly hi! 01:56, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:MartinRiseley_9343.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: kept with OTRS Skier Dude  ( talk ) 01:49, 26 February 2012 (UTC) "evidence of this has been lodged with the Wikimedia PR department" but not OTRS, and who is the PR department? MECU ≈ talk 02:33, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

RESPONSE: Permission for Wikipedia use was granted by the copyright owner of the image (the Edmonton Symphony) on 13 September 2006 and is included on the discussion page of the image (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_talk:MartinRiseley_9343.jpg). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rob McAlear (talk • contribs) 18:00, 2 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The permission has to be logged into a central system and you will need to send them copies of emails giving permission - the procedure is at Requesting copyright permission. MilborneOne (talk) 19:45, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

RESPONSE: Pemission granted by copyright holder (Edmonton Symphony Society) in September 2006. Response to "MECU": "PR department" phraseology was cut and pasted from an instruction page in either wikipedia or wikimedia regarding the posting of photos. How tiresome. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rob McAlear (talk • contribs) 05:02, 10 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Image now has link to OTRS ticket. MilborneOne (talk) 19:19, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Plan of crematoria at Aushwitz II.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

image of unfree map Samuell Lift me up or put me down 02:37, 30 May 2008 (UTC) RESPONSE: ''Image is free. Contacted the Aushwiz information desk. Is a public sign with a free licence and expired copyrights.'' Black Stripe (talk) 14:02, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but "public sign with a free licence and expired copyrights" seems to me like throwing reasons around without understanding them in the hope that the image won't be deleted. This one's gotta go. Stifle (talk) 19:44, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Crematoria at Auswitz II.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

image of unfree image Samuell Lift me up or put me down 02:38, 30 May 2008 (UTC) RESPONSE: ''Image is free. Contacted the Aushwiz information desk. Is a public sign with a free licence and expired copyrights''.Black Stripe (talk) 14:02, 11 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment. Per this, this is a derivative work of a copyright image. I suggest a non derivative fair use alternative, since, well, needless to say, there is simply nothing comparable to this photo. WilliamH (talk) 19:30, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Bchsband.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No source given and appears unlikely to be free  MBisanz  talk 04:46, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Barry Sisters.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Tagged as pd-self, but it's a photo of a record label therefore a derivative work. Orphaned to boot. Iain99Balderdash and piffle 19:47, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Barryallen.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Tagged as pd-self, but it's a photo of a record label therefore a derivative work. Orphaned to boot. Iain99Balderdash and piffle 19:48, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Goodlookingboy.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Sheet music cover tagged as pd-self, which seems unlikely. The (inactive) uploader has applied other dubious pd-self tags to images (see Image:Barry Sisters.jpg and Image:Barryallen.jpg above). Iain99Balderdash and piffle 19:52, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:1Butterflybaby.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Another sheet music or record cover, from the same uploader. Orphaned. Iain99Balderdash and piffle 19:54, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Racnoss.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

It looks suspiciously like a screenshot to me, meaning it's not PD. ...... Dendodge  .. Talk Help 20:41, 30 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I took the pic with my digital camera at the Doctor Who Exhibition at Earls Court. Look at the background, it isn't even in the DVD! Did you actually even notice the video screen on the back wall, the barrier at the front to keep back the public, or even read the metadata? Jack1956 (talk) 21:52, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * You're right, a quick look was all I had before. It's obvious this is an exhibition, sorry, I withdraw this ...... Dendodge  .. Talk Help 22:07, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Hate to rain on your parade, but the design of the Rakdos model is copyrighted by the BBC, so you can't just take a photo of it and claim copyright on it. Stifle (talk) 19:48, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Triumph 1987.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader unlikely to hold copyright on this promotional photo. <b style="color:green;">Polly</b> (<b style="color:red;">Parrot</b>) 21:01, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:KimmelCenterInteriorHDR.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence the uploader is the copyright holder of the photo, which shows as "all rights reserved" at Flickr. Kelly hi! 23:47, 30 May 2008 (UTC)


 * No evidence that Jon Anderson is Hendrix 682 at Flikr as stated is all rights reserved - tagged CSD I9. MilborneOne (talk) 19:53, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:KimmelCenterRoofGarden.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Same as above. Kelly hi! 23:47, 30 May 2008 (UTC)


 * No evidence that Jon Anderson is Hendrix 682 at Flikr as stated is all rights reserved - tagged CSD I9. MilborneOne (talk) 19:56, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.