Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 November 10



Image:Fozto diario.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Unused scan of a newspaper article. Soundvisions1 (talk) 00:12, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Photograph of a copyright work inherits the copyright - uploader cannot license it unless they are original copyright holder. No claim that they are. Unusual? Quite  TalkQu  21:56, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Italians_in_ethiopia_1935.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

PD Claim but no evidence Sfan00 IMG (talk) 02:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Italian photographs of informational quality enter the public domain 20 years after publication, per Italian law. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:30, 11 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, due to a major mess of laws and tribulations that lead PD-Italy to not be accepted on Commons. ViperSnake151 19:57, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't agree with the outcome of the discussion on commons. EU Harmonization doesn't seem to have the force of law. But regardless... a local copy on en.wikipedia does seem to be acceptable per PD-Italy. We're not commons after all and this IS in the public domain in the USA. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:40, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

- Deleted per commons discussion and PD-Italy because this image did had creative input. Garion96 (talk) 11:03, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Priyanka Chopra India.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

just look at it--Abhishek Jacob (talk) 17:45, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Haberdasher-anm-01.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

The image has been mistakenly tagged as CC-BY-SA, which Wikipedia accepts, but shows that it is actually licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA-unported, which we do not allow as it is a noncommercial license. Den dodge  Talk Contribs 18:30, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Irishguardshighlanders.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

GFDL claim - But UK 'colors' and arms are protected perptually? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:07, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:RN&RAF_colours.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

UK 'colors' are perptualy protected? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:12, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:RGBWback.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

PD by date- but UK millatry symbols may be protected for longer.. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:13, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Navy_colours.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

UK 'colors' are perptually protected? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:14, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Leroyal22regiment.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

PD claim -> But millatry symbol. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:15, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure I follow your reasoning. The regiment was created in 1914, that's more than 50 years ago, so expired crown copyright applies. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:18, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.