Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 November 13



Image:CBTL_Beverage_005_copy.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Unlikely uploader is the copyright holder - professional camera and uploader has history of files with no source. MER-C 07:19, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Winter_Dream_Tea.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Unlikely uploader is the copyright holder - professional camera and uploader has history of files with no source. MER-C 07:20, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Holiday_Blend_Package.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Unlikely uploader is the copyright holder - professional camera and uploader has history of files with no source. MER-C 07:20, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Cikker.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Listing in part to assist in the Commons discussion. Cikker died in 1989 and so no indication of why the image should be in the public domain. Uploader has a history of questionable uploads. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:46, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Stzaupthere.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Wrong copyright tag, no description. MER-C 08:25, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:SaatchiGallerySensation2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Looking over this, regarding of whether the Saatchi Gallery releases the image to the GFDL, I would think the copyright is really with the New York Post and so we would have an orphaned non-free newspaper article. Ricky81682 (talk) 10:57, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Article - Movement builds.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Scan of 1948 Canadian newspaper - not likely to be PD dave pape (talk) 15:52, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Sakshi.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

PD-Self claim - but webpage? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:25, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:River_Bybrook.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image with simmilar name previously listed as suspected copyvio by same uploader.. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:54, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and see below. While there does seem to be some misunderstanding of copyright issues amongst the early edits of this editor, I see no evidence of bad faith. This image and the one below both have matching meta-data, and are released into the public domain by the editor. Yes, there are a large swath of warnings on the editor's talk page, but many of these are spurious. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:39, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:The_Church_of_Saint_Christopher,_Ditteridge.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Listing because of previous issues with uploaders images Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:57, 13 November 2008 (UTC) --- Kept, this image and image above. These images look legit. Garion96 (talk) 11:51, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and see above. While there does seem to be some misunderstanding of copyright issues amongst the early edits of this editor, I see no evidence of bad faith. This image and the one above both have matching meta-data, and are released into the public domain by the editor. Yes, there are a large swath of warnings on the editor's talk page, but many of these are spurious. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:40, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Francis-Barnett_Falcon.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Listing because of previous copyright problems with users uploads Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:56, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Terminator TSCC Logo.svg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.- F ASTILY  (TALK) 01:58, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

User created copy of a film logo. It looks to me that there is enough originality in the logo for it to be copyrighted, meaning that this is a copyrighted derivative work, and non-free. J Milburn (talk) 18:46, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * This should should be deleted as it is incredibly questionable in terms of copyright and seem to have no useful purpose. John Reaves 21:19, 13 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. Not enough originality to copyright. Clear-cut example of PD-ineligible PD-textlogo. You certainly can't copyright the type style that was used. The only thing that would be remotely copyrightable would be that faded red background, and it is not even the same as what is on the official website. I doubt the background is copyrightable, but even if it were, it's the creation of the author. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:52, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The faded red background and the overall colour scheme is copied from the intro sequence of the series. Here's an example (at 0:07). --IE (talk) 09:45, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
 * OK... fair enough. As I mentioned though, I still don't think there is enough there to copyright. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:13, 14 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:CasaVerde LaUribe.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image appears to have been taken from elsewhere. I doubt the uploader is the copyright holder. J Milburn (talk) 18:55, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Caratula Jessico Megamix.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Album cover. Very unlikely to be free. — Million_Moments (talk) 19:15, 13 November 2008 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Mezclas.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Album cover. Very unlikely uploader has copyright — Million_Moments (talk) 19:20, 13 November 2008 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Caratula Babasonica Electronica.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Album cover. Very unliekly uploader has copyright — Million_Moments (talk) 19:22, 13 November 2008 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.