Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 November 16



Image:High.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Unused image. The user has uploaded other images taken for Getty Images so it is somewhat unlikely this image is an original. Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:10, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Stifle (talk) 11:42, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Crosby87.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Seriously doubt that the uploader is the copyright owner... —Krm500 (Communicate!) 01:17, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Open_Space_for_a_cover.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Watermarking indicates the uploader is not the copyright holder as claimed. Nv8200p talk 01:50, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Optimal_energy_joule.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Source website supports the fact that uploader is not the copyright holder as claimed. Nv8200p talk 01:57, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Otasco_band.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Summary indicates the uploader is not the copyright holder as claimed. Nv8200p talk 02:18, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:20080615-Jade 2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

I would have done a nom for blatant copyvio however the image is taken from what seems to be a fan site that contains images from many sources so it is doubtful the website is the original source either. There is no proof that the original photographer released this image under a CCL Soundvisions1 (talk) 03:58, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

I am officially withdrawing my Noms. Lets just ignore all rules and assume good faith in this matter. This user has made a lot of main space edits so I think it is fine to bend a few rules here. If there is a quesiton about copyright just change the licensing to fair use and add a FUR. It is good for the project. Soundvisions1 (talk) 23:40, 24 November 2008 (UTC)


 * I am the webmaster of source website Jade Online. The photographer Sunny is one of our member who often takes photos of Jade Kwan for the website. Jade Online reserves all the rights of his photos. Vincentkhm (talk) 09:33, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * :*Comment: I am adding a di-no permission tag to the image so Sunny can release it and show proof that this image was released via the given license. You can read the information on the image for more details. Thanks. NOTE: Please refrain form removing tags such as these from articles and images you have created or uploaded yourself. Soundvisions1 (talk)
 * The photographer is one of the photography-participators working for Jade Online. Jade Online and I as the main author hold all the rights of his participated photos that he made. Vincentkhm (talk) 19:41, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * This image is sourced right to Jade Online. Vincentkhm (talk) 21:10, 17 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment: This problem is that, while you say you are the webmaster of the site the images came from, a look at the content of the website shows images have come from many sources. Just because you maintain a website does not mean that you hold the copyright on all images found there. For example "2002-04-27" and "2002-04-28" are two gallery's that contain images watermarked as being from other websites. "Album" is a listing of musical releases that contains images of front and back covers. "Model" contains scans from magazines. While the images Image:20080615-Jade.jpg and Image:20080615-Jade 2.jpg may very well have been released under the licenses you claim Wikipedia must have the original photographer release on file. Your current "authorship" is claiming copyright for yourself and the website you are the webmaster for however the website itself does not establish any copyright or license information nor any verification that the photographers you mention as being the image creators have released them under the free license's stated. Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:47, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

*Note to admin: I found: Dick Ho, the photog who took Image:20080615-Jade.jpg. The Wikipedia version appears to be a cropped version of 20080615_JKFun_024, cropped to remove the watermarks. Soundvisions1 (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:448t461.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Unsed image taken from http://i12.tinypic.com/448t461.jpg which has been deleted. Soundvisions1 (talk) 04:53, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Shaunwilliamson.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Source website is all rights reserved, uploader implies that they are the copyright holder through the use of a tag, but not explicitly. J Milburn (talk) 12:19, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Bhayanak Maut.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Clearly a publicity photo, the uploader probably does not own the rights to this image. J Milburn (talk) 12:20, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:MelodyJonesImage.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Appears to be a screenshot of a copyrighted television show, which means that the source website, even if they do claim that others are free to use the images, does not have the right to release them. J Milburn (talk) 13:01, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:515yzKgmI6L. SL160 AA115 .jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Unused icon sized image of a CD cover. Summary says "owned by Cary Brothers, fair use for promotion", License is CCL Soundvisions1 (talk) 14:53, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Skhul burial.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.- F ASTILY  (TALK) 01:55, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Could a picture of this be gotten by free means? I think it could - it's not irreplaceable. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 15:16, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Use {{subst:dfu}} to challenge a fair use claim. Stifle (talk) 11:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:TACA Old Livery Nicaragua.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Scanned image uploader unlikely to be copyright holder MilborneOne (talk) 15:32, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Taca boeing 737 miami.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploaded by serial copyright violator unlikely to be copyright holder MilborneOne (talk) 15:36, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Taca airbus a320 france.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploaded by USA-based serial copyright violator unlikely to be copyright holder of image taken in France MilborneOne (talk) 15:38, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Shweta tiwari.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader with a history of copyright violations is claiming copyright and release to public domain. The image appears to be a cropped publicity photo with the actor's name partially cropped at the bottom. Similar image also shows up at http://i7.tinypic.com/20ze5xt.jpg Whpq (talk) 16:10, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Namitha.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader with a history of copyright violations is claiming copyright and release to public domain. The image appears to be a publicity photo, and a watermark is visible although not clear enough for me to read. Whpq (talk) 16:24, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Dimmgirliveaoa.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

User has repeatedly uploaded images of black metal bands under various different licenses. I doubt that this is their own work. J Milburn (talk) 19:14, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Muslimhijra mukhannathun.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Source link clearly states "© All rights reserved." http://www.flickr.com/photos/firozeshakir/1241725359/ Uploader has a long history of uploading violative images to Wikipedia. Jokestress (talk) 20:06, 16 November 2008 (UTC)


 * the blog of the creator of the image on which thepicture appears says what I said it says when I uploaded it. Look at the original justification on the image. The all rights reserved thing is likey from flickr and relates to their web site.  I am on a mobile device and in a hurry.  I would write more.--Hfarmer (talk) 01:01, 17 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Ok looking at the website jokestress points to I see the copyright notice she point too claims Yahoo inc as the owner. I am certain that is related to the website flickr and not the photos.  When one uploads to flickr or photobucket you still own the copyright.  Otherwise the person could not use it on their own blog.  It is on the photographers blog where he disclaims all rights to the image therefore it is public domain.  Such is indicated by the lawyers opinion I cited. --Hfarmer (talk) 04:08, 17 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Flickr allows the author to specify from several licenses for images. This is identified in the "Additional information" area and not the bottom of the page.  As Jokestress notes, the image is marked as (C) all rights reserved.  The blog notice never makes an explicit release into the public domain.  In fact, it makes no clear statement about the distribution of material, and also states "None of my pictures or articles of the authors are for commercial purpose ..only for general hijda awareness." which hints at possible restrictions on commercial use if this were a statement of licensing. -- Whpq (talk) 11:18, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I have sent email to the photographer. Let us wait a bit until we see what he says to the images use.  If he does not respond in a timely manner I would agree that this should be removed to be on the safe side.  However this case is far from clear.  Can someone in one place reserve all rights... then in another place disclaim some or all of those rights?  Which one is the more forceful?  Or does it matter which came first?  Only a lawyer could give a definite answer.  But common sense would dictate that one can at first reserve all rights then latter disclaim those rights.  Since uploading to flickr would precede writing the blog, with it's disclaimer.  I would say that the release of rights takes effect and nullifies that copyright notice.
 * Before acting precipitously let's give the photog some time. --Hfarmer (talk) 19:59, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * For the mean time I have taken the action recommended in the template that had been used. The issue is that this Image may not be public domain.  The template autosets a date on which the Image will be deleted.  In this case Tuesday November 25 2008.  That should be long enough if he checks his email (or the comments on his blog) to get a reply.  --Hfarmer (talk) 00:05, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:MutsuScan.GIF
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

I find it very hard to believe that the uploader has permission to publish it under the license claimed. -MBK004 20:16, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Airport1a.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

This image uses a PD-Netherlands license -- 70 years after death -- but the runway in the image was not installed until 1991 (per the article) so the image has to be no older the 19 years. Also, no source is provided and the uploader is absent. Jordan 1972 (talk) 23:38, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Makali_Aizue.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

absetn uplaoder, source link provided is to a different image of the same subject, assuming it is from the same site (I could not find it) it is very unlikely it is a PD-self licensable image Jordan 1972 (talk) 23:44, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.