Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 November 18



Image:Rosalie Howarth.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploaded by block-evading sock of user who was banned for multiple image copyvios. Dubious fair-use claim. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 09:12, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:LindsayLohanMugshot.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

uploader claims GNU Free Documentation License, but I don't see what evidence they have of that Asher196 (talk) 05:14, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Replaced with an image from Wikimedia Commons--OK to delete.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:FC Game Console.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No reason why the image is in the public domain. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:48, 18 November 2008 (UTC) -- Why not? Kept. Garion96 (talk) 19:52, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Faceball.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No reason why the image is in the public domain. Also orphaned and possibly UE. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:49, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Heather-locklear-dui-b.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader claims GFDL, but I don't see what evidence they have of that. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:51, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:KidrockDekalbMugshot.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader claims GFDL, but I don't see what evidence they have of that. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:51, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Dragoslav Šekularac.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

listed as from www.BelgradeArt.com - a commercial non-sharealike site - nothing I can see says this is a free image Peripitus (Talk) 12:11, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Juliano Roberto Antonello.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Listed as "From Juca's MySpace." but with a CC license - no evidence this is correct Peripitus (Talk) 12:15, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Darko Maletić - 33.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Listed as "From Juca's MySpace." but with a CC license - no evidence this is correct Peripitus (Talk) 12:15, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Žarko Lazetić.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Listed as "From Juca's MySpace." but with a CC license - no evidence this is correct Peripitus (Talk) 12:15, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Lamine Diarra - photo by Marko Risović.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I11 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Listed as Photo by Marko Risović. but with a CC licence. No evidence that the uploader owns the image nor that the licence is correct. Marko appears to be a pro photographer Peripitus (Talk) 12:18, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Saša Viciknez.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Noted as from the commercial site BelgradeArt.com - no evidence that the uploader's added free licence is correct. Peripitus (Talk) 12:19, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Stevan Jovetić.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I11 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Noted on the image page "Photo by Boris Topalov" - not the uploader. No evidence that the free licence is correct Peripitus (Talk) 12:19, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Uroš Stamatović.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Listed as by "Djuradj Vujčić" - no evidence that this is the uploader nor that the free licence on the image is correct Peripitus (Talk) 12:20, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:AMALKANTI.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Unused image of a movie poster. Summary is an article disguised as a "description" of the image. Soundvisions1 (talk) 17:50, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:CARO REFUGIO web.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Unused movie poster Soundvisions1 (talk) 17:53, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Aaliyahms.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Derivative artwork based on "Queen of the Damned" film poster. ("One sheet") Soundvisions1 (talk) 18:22, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Acalukas.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Unused image, looks like a promo shot for a film Soundvisions1 (talk) 18:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:AbiolaAbrams2.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image says "Photo of Abiola Abrams. Photo Credit Abiola Abrams.". This is full body shot of the subject standing on a street posing. Soundvisions1 (talk) 18:53, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * According to this page, the image was shot by Helena Kubicka De Braganca and there is no information indicating any sort of GFDL compatible release. The image also appears in Flickr in a photostream that is apparently Abiola Abram's photostream based on the link from her official site.  The flickr image is copyrighted with all rights reserved. -- Whpq (talk) 22:53, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the info. I Changed this to a CSD I9. Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:44, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Chilipress-screenshot.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Screenshot of a website. I doubt the uplaoder owns the rights to this image. J Milburn (talk) 19:12, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:CdeB4.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

If this image is from circa 1890, as stated, it is entirely feasible that the photographer lived to 1920 or even only 1910. This means it's not eligible for pd-old, as described, and must instead be fair use. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 22:24, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Has been modified for a hoax article User:Catherine de Burgh/Catherine de Burgh so should be deleted as not encyclopedic. MilborneOne (talk) 22:30, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Er....It's Adolf Hitler: Image:Baby-hitler.jpg. DrKiernan (talk) 14:09, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Yup, it is. Keep - certainly pd. Copy the source over if there's a problem. Cavalry, since you know Giano is the uploader, did you question him before nominating this?--Scott MacDonald (talk) 16:20, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I wasn't aware I had to, and I wasn't aware until recently that Giano was the uploader. I did notify the CdB account - is that the same? all the same, if this is obviously PD, then I think we can safely keep it :) Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 10:19, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Mariziniwedding.gif
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep; for now- F ASTILY  (TALK) 01:55, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

if this photo was taken in 1889, the author may not have died until 1910, in which case, this is not pd-old. Unless we can have proof to the contrary, this is not public domain. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 22:28, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Has been modified for a hoax article User:Catherine de Burgh/Catherine de Burgh so should be deleted as not encyclopedic. MilborneOne (talk) 22:31, 19 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Actually, it is in user space. A hoax (which has intention to deceive) is not the same as a parody (which does not). Has anyone bothered to ask Giano about this, since he's the uploader? No?--Scott MacDonald (talk) 09:41, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.