Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 November 20



Image:Albert Grajales.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I8 by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:27, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello. The owner of the picture is Albert Grajales and is not copyright by owner. It was given to me by my request. The photographer is Jose O Perez a student of Grajales. You may contact the owner at the address below his information. Thank you. Roman2006

November 20

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:ChineseWZ551APC.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence that the image comes from the cited source, and absolutely no evidence for the federal government PD tag. Mosmof (talk) 01:28, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete That image was probably hosted at that address, there is an old copy at archive.org (Of course, the only broken image on the whole page is the one we are discussing about -.-) However, the main page says "Copyright ©1996-2000 Philip Young" and it doesn't indicate the origin of any of those photographies, and it says nothing anywhere about the photos being obtained from the Army. The page no longer exists, and archive.org only has copies until 2000. --Enric Naval (talk) 14:44, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:SS Conte de Savoia.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

This image is not a work of Frederic Logghe that is free license because this image is from a collection of George Carr. This image is all right reserved and replaceable. Aquitania (talk) 04:22, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Ah, thank you for pointing out the actual source of the image, I was unaware of that. In that case, the image should be deleted...by the way, if you could find a free replacement that would be great. SynergyStar (talk) 22:19, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Trisha Actress.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Looks to be a screenshot from a film or at least professional done. User has a history of questionable uploads. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:31, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete According to metadata, this photo was taken with a Nikon D100, which is a $1500 photo camera that was discontinued on 2005, taken on November 2007 and modified on December 2007 with a program called Watermark Factory, which is used to add text and watermarks to images. There is a very small chance that a professional photographer with an expensive camera decides to release a professional photography with CC-attribution without indicating his real name so it can be attributed to him, and without releasing it first to Flickr. This coppyright needs more proof. --Enric Naval (talk) 14:52, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - I've just speedied this as a blatant copyvio and am working through the rest of the uploader's images. This image is from a pro-photo shoot....I know this as I found and deleted the identical image a couple of months ago (uploaded by someone else) - Peripitus (Talk) 20:39, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Trisha Nemo Tattoo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned image, but user has a history of questionable uploads. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:31, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:ARRahman.Stop.TB.Forum.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned, but user has a history of questionable uploads. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:34, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Genelia2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Looks like a professional shot and user has a history of questionable uploads. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:35, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete That white line at the bottom, it's most probably the result of the crop of an advertisment or a magazine page --Enric Naval (talk) 14:29, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The white line at the bottom has the text ragalahari.com repeated across it - almost certain not the work of the uploader and a copyright violation. MilborneOne (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Udit in indian idol.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

This is a poor television screenshot being used merely to show what a living person looks like. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:57, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Fair use for living persons can't be only to show what they look like --Enric Naval (talk) 14:54, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


 * I won't mind this picture being deleted. I know this picture is of very poor quality. I put this picture in Wiki expecting someone else will replace it with a better quality one. Since that hasn't happened and I don't have a better picture and at the same time you want to delete it, then so be it. Rabin06 (talk) 20:42, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Additionally, the purpose of this picture wasn't exactly to show how the particular person looks like, I wanted to show the person was a judge in Indian Idol by taking the screenshot of the person as a judge in it. Rabin06 (talk) 20:44, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Aegir-06s.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Unused image. Looks like a scan of a flyer. A better image, Image:Aegir-03s.jpg, already exists and is used in the associated article. Soundvisions1 (talk) 14:52, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Aileen Campbell MSP.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Unsure of copyright status or original source. Summary only says "Original taken 6th September 2006 in the Scottish Parliament" Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:30, 20 November 2008 (UTC) - Kept - No reason to assume unfree. Garion96 (talk) 12:04, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Albert Grajales.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I8 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Conflict of licensing and wording of allowed use. Claims "author" is Jose O. Perez with a "Co-author" - Roman2006, the uploader of the image. It also says the image is authorized for use on the "en.wikipedia" by the "Puerto Rico Bodyguard Association Inc". It adds on the actual source of the image is "Jose Perez for Albert Grajales Bodyguard Service and Training / Puerto Rico Bodyguard Association Inc." and finally that "The author, co-author and hereby subjects grants use of the image under the GFDL". Soundvisions1 (talk) 16:13, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Kept, no reason to assume it is a copyvio. Garion96 (talk) 21:21, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note, image was already on commons at Image:Albert Grajales.jpg. Garion96 (talk) 21:28, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.