Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 November 21



Image:MV5BMTQxNTU1OTIxN15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMzYyNzQ3MQ@@ V1 SX309 SY400 .jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image appears on imdb with the same filename. There is no evidence to support the uploaders assertation that they created this image. Deadly&forall;ssassin 02:21, 21 November 2008 (UTC)


 * I'll replace it ASAP with something that I have explicit permission for although I have implicit permission from the owner of the copyright for the current one. Johngagon (talk) 16:50, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: If you are in contact with the photographer and they are telling you it is ok for use than ask them to email that permission following the Requesting copyright permission "how-to guide". Soundvisions1 (talk) 17:15, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Animated-Flag-Mexico.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G4 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

This image has been labeled, , , and now. We still don't know where the image came from, which is the real question. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:49, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Amalorpavadass1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

This image seems to be a watermarked version of Image:Amalorpavadass.jpg however both images are used in the article D. S. Amalorpavadass, this one is a "gallery" that says it is a book cover, in which case Fair Use should be applied however as the article is not about the book and because there is another images that is exactly the same (sans the "Atma Purna Anubhava by Swami Amaloranda" watermark/text) adding a FUR would not matter. Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:06, 21 November 2008 (UTC) Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:06, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Amazingangels.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

This is more of an advertisement/flyer for the subject. Aside from promotion (website, phone numbers, awards, accreditation) It does not really add to the Saint Michael's College of Laguna articles existing text content. The source says "created this work entirely by myself". (Like wise Image:SMCLad.jpg, which is hosted on Commons, does not add anything either and it is a variation of this image.) Soundvisions1 (talk) 16:43, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Danny.simpson.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I1 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

The user who uploaded this image has also uploaded several images of other Manchester United players. I find it extremely unlikely that the user who uploaded the images took them himself/herself, and hence the public domain license is invalid. Preferably, I would like proof that the user owns the copyright to the images, but if this is not possible then deletion is the only option. — – PeeJay 17:48, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - Three images uploaded by User:CrackersTeam have now been deleted due to a lack of licensing information. I believe the only remaining ones are Image:Danny.simpson.jpg and Image:Wes.Brown.jpg. – PeeJay 10:29, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: There are still some more that are most likely copyvios, see his image contributions. Image:BenWilliamsSinger.jpg is one example of a dubious own work claim. --Kjetil r (talk) 17:59, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Anders lundegard.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I8 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Summary says "Photo of classical saxophonist Anders Lundegård, to be inserted in Anders Lundegård" which implies it is for WIkipedia Use only. Soundvisions1 (talk) 19:46, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't think that implies anything of the kind. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:43, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I inter linked it, sorry. The actual text is the direct url - "...to be inserted in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anders_Lundeg%C3%A5rd" which is a link to the Wikipedia article, here on Wikipedia. It defines a specific use for the image, which I was of the impression is not allowable under the specified licenses, or under Wikipedia Policy on image use. Soundvisions1 (talk) 21:04, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * It doesn't say "only may be used in Anders Lundegård". It just suggests one possible use. It's a bit of an odd statement, which could be a language issue. The licensing tag is rather clear though. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:21, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

- kept - Garion96 (talk) 21:27, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:LumetPortrait1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Can not imagine "Filmmakers Series - Sidney Lumet" did not have a (c) logo. Garion96 (talk) 22:14, 21 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Even if the book is copyrighted, its copyright would not cover the archival image, which would have most likely been used "by permission" of the holder, if any.


 * The image was uploaded as public domain since it would have been improbable for this to have a renewed copyright. I am close to a copyright depository and have discovered that only about 2% of copyrighted photos are and were renewed.  And those are usually commercial or well-known images, such as Ansel Adams's or C.S. Bull's movie star images. So it seemed more accurate to tag this as PD, since to list it as "fair use" would imply that it has a valid copyright, which is most likely not true. In any case, it's unlikely that there would be any other Wiki use for this image, so either license is fine.


 * Your call: I can leave it as PD;  change it to "fair use"; or find another image (there are many around.)Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 01:41, 22 November 2008 (UTC)


 * PD-Pre1978 requires the work to have been published before 1978, not just created. The Filmmakers Series book appears to be from 1993; without evidence of a pre-1978 publication without notice, the 1993 publication would make it automatically copyrighted until 70 years after the photographer's death.  (Also note that non-renewal is only relevant for works published before 1964.)  --dave pape (talk) 21:09, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * It can't be kept under fair use since it fails non-free content criteria#1. The image is replaceable. Garion96 (talk) 23:41, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I am going to send this to IFD for a more visible discussion. Stifle (talk) 18:00, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Lapu-Lapu.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

http://www.ngkhai.net/cebupics gives no suggestion of GFDl Samuell Lift me up or put me down 22:17, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Commons shining through. Garion96 (talk) 21:30, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.