Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 November 28



Image:Loma linda university church front.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:07, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

The source for this file is described as being from the Loma Linda University Church of Seventh-day Adventists promotional image collection. Unless the uploader represents that organization, or has permission to distribute it here, I don't believe this image should remain here. Besides, this image has been orphaned. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 07:11, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

I, Brianweedster (talk) 07:17, 28 November 2008 (UTC), represent the organization, and have the right to distribute images from the church promotional collection. I'm not sure what it means that the image has been orphaned, but is is fine to remain here. Brianweedster (talk) 07:17, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Uploader still needs to follow the procedure at Requesting copyright permission to ensure that image release is entered into the OTRS. Probably better to tag the image as no permission Npd rather than possibly unfree image. MilborneOne (talk) 22:19, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the information MilborneOne. I sent an e-mail to the OTRS. I will post it here as well for reference: Brianweedster (talk) 22:49, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I hereby assert that I am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of WORK http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Loma_linda_university_church_front.jpg.


 * I agree to publish that work under the free license LICENSE [images: GNU Free Documentation License].


 * I acknowledge that I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.


 * I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be attributed to me.


 * I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.


 * 2008/11/28, BRIAN WEED, LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHURCH OF SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS
 * I've got a GFDL release on OTRS, so this image is . Stifle (talk) 16:24, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Playstationhomever1.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:54, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

This appears to be a a screenshot of copyrighted software (although obtained using a camera) and as such cannot be claimed as original work by the uploader. May be sufficient just to change the licencing to this one.  ChimpanzeeUK  - User | Talk | Contribs 15:52, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Loma linda university church front.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:08, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

I have reason to believe this image's copyright does not belong to the uploader. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 19:51, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

What, specifically, must I do to prove that this image is cleared for use here? I attempted to prove that I, representing the organization, own the copyright to the image by uploading the high res version. Having a "reason to believe this image's copyright does not belong to the uploader" does not really mean anything, and does not tell me what I need to provide to satisfy Arbiteroftruth's problem with this image. Please tell me what it is that you need, or do you just not care much for the image? This is starting to be silly. Brianweedster (talk) 20:13, 28 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Refer to comments above image was tagged twice. MilborneOne (talk) 22:22, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.