Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 November 30



Image:Sukhumpong Ngonkham.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Per a on a similar image, this probably came from the Thailand government's webpage and thus wasn't the uploader's copyright to put in the public domain. Following, images from Thailand's government page may be copyrightable. This is for a living public officers so fairuse is doubtful. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:20, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Weissenbergeffect.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

This is taken from a website  which says permission has been given to reproduce it from a book: i.e. Photograph courtesy from D.V. Boger and K. Walters, "Rheological Phenomena in Focus". The uploader (no user page) claims to be the copyright holder.Chemical Engineer (talk) 10:47, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Apulum Alba Iulia.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Shield od a football club. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn (talk) 16:05, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Unirea Mai 2008.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Seems to be a poster, has plenty of watermarks on. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn (talk) 16:07, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Unirea old picture.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Apparently an old image. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn (talk) 16:07, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Intrare stadion.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader has provided several other suspicious images, no explicit source info. J Milburn (talk) 16:09, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Dist Kotli.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image states "Copyrights Reserved", but is uploaded under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 — (EhJJ)TALK 17:29, 30 November 2008 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Faris Ahmed Jamaan al-Showeel al-Zahrani from Saudi police poster.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm not sure that a Saudi police poster would be in the public domain. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:01, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

It isn't a police poster. It's taken from a photograph of a police poster. I took the photo. It's blurry because it came from a videotape. One I made. I extracted a single frame from the video and cleaned it up in a photo editing program. I released the photo to the public domain. All of the parts of the image that Saudi Arabia could conceivably make a claim to have been removed. The poster is made from a picture not owned by the police or the Saudi government. There is no assertion of copyright of the original or the poster. It was visible in a public place and is not a landmark or building which has protected status. It is in no way an unfree image. This seems to me to be overzealous unfree image hunting and a waste of time, this is years old and nobody has made a replacement for it. User:Pedant (talk) 09:49, 2 December 2008 (UTC) - Delete as Derivative work. Garion96 (talk) 10:05, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:First E-3 sentry.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

image was deleted from Commons as it is copyrighted to Boeing not the federal government MilborneOne (talk) 22:37, 30 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Here, the USAF lists the image as a "Courtesy photo". Binksternet (talk) 22:49, 30 November 2008 (UTC)


 * As you point out above, this was likely not taken by a member of the US military. However, it seems to fit PD-Pre1978, as it was distributed as a courtesy photo prior to 1978 without a copyright notice. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:21, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks! I'll have to use that template myself some day. Binksternet (talk) 05:16, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Out of interest how do we know it was published without a copyright notice? MilborneOne (talk) 11:06, 3 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Because there is no copyright notice visible on the work, and as a courtesy photo it was not published as part of a larger work that might include a copyright notice. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:30, 6 December 2008 (UTC)


 * OK it may have been issued as part of a press release. MilborneOne (talk) 20:07, 10 December 2008 (UTC)


 * And how do we know it wasn't first publisher elsewhere with a copyright notice? Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:05, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

- Deleted - Lack of evidence it is PD. Garion96 (talk) 19:14, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.