Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 October 22



Image:Fnw small.jpg
Incorrect image tag; the image is obviously copyrighted, therefore, it is classified as non-free. Blake Gripling (talk) 10:59, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Michael Buckley.jpg
Screenshot is not copyrighted by the uploader, and the image is therefore not free. Cirt (talk) 01:17, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Screenshot. Doubtful that the uploader is the copyright holder as claimed. -Nv8200p talk 21:26, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Master li hongzhi.jpg
This image is from falundafa.org with no indication of a GFDL compatible license. The claimed fair use rational is insufficient by Wikipedia guidelines since the photo merely illustrates Mr. Li, who is still living. I have met the guy in person and believe it is quite possible, if difficult, to get a free picture of him.-- Bdentremont (talk) 20:00, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Wrong forum, this is not possibly unfree but for sure unfree. Garion96 (talk) 21:53, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Noelie mcdonnell2008.jpg
Doubtful that it is copyrighted by the uploader, from http://extraordinaryrendition.co.uk/bands/band.php?id=108 feydey (talk) 11:31, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:LandofSpirits.jpg
Orphaned logo Soundvisions1 (talk) 13:29, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Lily lazer.jpg
Licensed as PD and claimed to be a personal photo, but the image looks very much like a newspaper scan. The uploader has a history of contributing copyrighted content. — Yerpo (talk) 13:40, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Lauren02web.jpg
Orphaned photo. Low quality. Not sure if this is a low rez "full" version of the possibly cropped Image:Lauren01web.jpg or not. Both images are watermarked with a "Image by The Gyaos" (Not sure about that last word) however the Summary for this one says "Photo by JH". Possible copyvio? (Both images) Soundvisions1 (talk) 14:21, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Tvguide season 2.jpg
Looks like a scan of a TV Guide magazine, in which case I doubt the uploader is the copyright owner. In any event, this image would only be fair-use in an article about the magazine itself. Rodhull andemu  17:57, 22 October 2008 (UTC)