Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 October 6



Image:Newphotogabby.jpg
User:Ian M.S. Royer is not Fadil Berisha dave pape (talk) 02:58, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Gabbymain.jpg
The author named on duplicate Image:Newphotogabby.jpg (Fadil Berisha) is more likely the real author. dave pape (talk) 03:00, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Mainprofilegabby.jpg
Author given as "Bill Agitong", not User:Ian M.S. Royer, so not likely to be PD-self dave pape (talk) 03:03, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Gabbycarnival.jpg
Author given as "Laura Ferreira" - not PD-self dave pape (talk) 03:04, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Bremen fire.jpg
No evidence that the image is in the public domain per German copyright law, as the uploader claims. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:38, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:First Balkan War.JPG
This really doesn't look like PD-Old, it looks like a modern computer generated map, also the source given links to a forum, certainly not the real source. The infobox says the date and author are unknown so how can it be PD-Old ? Jackaranga (talk) 07:53, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Keyshia Cole at Foxy Browns.jpg
User has a history of uploading copyvio images of Keyshia Cole. Very low resolution, no Meta data. It's likely that this is also a copyvio, although I can't find a source. Papa November (talk) 11:44, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ seicer  &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs  23:58, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Newphotogabby.jpg
User:Ian M.S. Royer is not Fadil Berisha dave pape (talk) 02:58, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:BeckettBridge.jpg
Uploader claims GFDL, but identical image was previously published at http://www.irish-architecture.com/news/2006/000092.html with identical image properties, and under a different licence. No assertion of permission evident. (FYI - Image is a composite/3D graphics software creation. Image isn't of actual bridge and couldn't have been taken by a member of the public. Because bridge is not built yet. Therefore copyright lies with company of architects who created composite image.) — Guliolopez (talk)

Image:SemioticRectangle.gif
Uploader claims GFDL, but identical image was previously published at http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/S4B/Images/semsqr.gif with identical image properties, and under a different licence. User attribution to self more than also likely false. — Guliolopez (talk) 13:11, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Juliette Frette.jpg
Uploader claims permission was given, but it is suspect considering that the uploader has continuously uploaded unfree images. This was more than likely taken from the whitehotmagazine.com website without permission. — -- Ðysepsion † Speak your mind 17:34, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Officer-3.jpg
While I am sure that the creativitiy bringing together of all the portions of this image is GFDL, the actual components (logos, bars and insignia) are not free. The uploader is recently absent, April/08. Jordan 1972 (talk) 22:42, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Cornwall - Men-an-Tol.jpg
According to the Flickr page for this image - at http://www.flickr.com/photos/keithmarshall/83999520/ - it is CC non-commercial and not free enough. Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:45, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * This image has now been replaced Talskiddy

Image:OklahomaCityUnionStationSchematic.jpg
This is a section of a schematic which the uploader stated was authored by Tom Elmore (unlikely to be uploader based on user name) and stated it was used with permission. The GFDL-presumed tag was added by the uploader. The image was uploaded Aug 5/08, well after the cut-off date for use of the GFDL-presumed license. Jordan 1972 (talk) 22:46, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Tom Elmore is NOT the uploader. He gave the photograph to me to use to save Union Station. He's filling out a sworn affidavit giving me authority to use it. Who do I need to contact to send that affidavit to so we don't have somebody deleting images used with permission? 15:20, 9 October 2008 (UTC)Rich


 * Have a read of Requesting copyright permission for the details of what, how and why about getting permission for copyrighted material usage. I will also add a copy of this to the uploader's talk page too as it appears he has been having licensing issues on a number of images.--Jordan 1972 (talk) 15:21, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Obtaining sworn affidavit but in meantime have changed to since it's from his documentation for promotional material attempting to save Union Station.RickyRob2 (talk) 19:17, 9 October 2008 (UTC)Rich
 * Stifle (talk) 10:09, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Gondwana arstanosaurus.jpg
Image comes from http://www.gondwanastudios.com/img/arstanosaurus.jpg and there's no evidence uploader was the creator. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:02, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Gondwana avimimus.jpg
Being dicussed on commons at. Image comes from http://www.gondwanastudios.com/img/avimimus.jpg and there's no evidence that the uploader had or could grant permission to use/upload this. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:04, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Stifle (talk) 10:11, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Ubuntu.png
contains non-free logo&mdash;Danorton (talk) 23:13, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The logos are de minimis. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:43, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Stifle (talk) 10:10, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Pete63small.JPG
Uploader claims that the image was sent for use on Wikipedia and then applied the GFDL-presumed license -- insufficiently licnesed. Jordan 1972 (talk) 23:29, 6 October 2008 (UTC)