Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 September 13



Image:Roni browers.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.- F ASTILY  (TALK) 02:02, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

This is not a logo. Corvus cornix talk  02:28, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * And this board is not for fair use images :) Stifle (talk) 19:50, 17 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Slideshow02.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

http://www.bayschoolsf.org/campus/slideshow/slideshow.html

As seen in the link, this image is NOT free, yet is classified as a PD image without copyright info. As it is very likely that the Bay School shot that image, that picture is not PD, but rather fully copyrighted unless I am in some way wrong.  Marlith  (Talk)   04:32, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Kahitisangsaglitlogo1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image is not free since this is an ID of a copyrighted show. — Xeltran (talk) 05:10, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:B.W. Edwards photo IMG 1476.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

derivative work of (presumably) copyrighted photographic portrait — Bellhalla (talk) 12:26, 13 September 2008 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Bradley Stryker Tiillamook Treasure.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

The uploader Radoyan identifies as the principal of Bright Light Studio which owns the copyright of the image, but allows Wikipedia to use it. Image contains a watermark and copyright notice, which suggests that perhaps this is not a free use, or at least that the use of the image is not offered to WP's end users. Rossrs (talk) 14:49, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * There's an interesting argument here though. They grant "unrestricted use of this image under the terms of Wikipedia's license agreement". This seems to imply GFDL to me. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:31, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

-- Deleted GFDL must be specified. Garion96 (talk) 19:32, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Lecrae_Photoshoot.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Title says image is from a photo shoot but no evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder. Nv8200p talk 19:36, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Ledbetter_statue,_Shreveport,_LA_IMG_1329.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Photo is of a sculpture with no evidence that the sculpture is in the public domain. There is no freedom of panorama in the USA so this would be a derivative work. Nv8200p talk 19:39, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * You are correct. The statue was dedicated in 1993. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:50, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:LeeBarden2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Studio portrait. I don't believe the uploader is the copyright holder as claimed. Nv8200p talk 19:50, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Leila_Sbitani.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

"Image directly from subject" does not grant use under the GFDL as the subject may not own the copyright. Nv8200p talk 20:01, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * It's her headshot. Don't they pay for those? Or could it still be copywritten by the photographer? MrKIA11 (talk) 23:38, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Unless there was a "work-for-hire" agreement, the copyright stays with the photographer. -Nv8200p talk 02:02, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Pic-3811.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

the watermark in the upper right corner for the website Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:02, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.