Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 September 16



Image:Quidditch and Fantastic Beasts.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:00, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

It is an image of two copyrighted book covers (which are already used on Wikipedia, under fair use, as Image:Quidditchthroughtheages.jpg and Image:Fantastic beasts.JPG) and as such cannot be released under the GFDL. — Mr. Absurd (talk) 00:28, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Ventrilo, 3.1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:00, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Uploader asserts he is the copyright holder and has released the image into the public domain. However, the image is of copyrighted software available at www.ventrilo.com and the uploader has provided no proof of his claim that he holds copyright. The uploader, User:TheBomb, has previously uploaded other, now deleted, images with similar licensing claims. — AussieLegend (talk) 02:59, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Ventrilo,3.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:00, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Uploader asserts he is the copyright holder and has released the image into the public domain. However, the image is of copyrighted software available at www.ventrilo.com and the uploader has provided no proof of his claim that he holds copyright. The uploader, User:TheBomb, has previously uploaded other, now deleted, images with similar licensing claims. — AussieLegend (talk) 02:59, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

everything uploaded by User:20176

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Deleted- F ASTILY  (TALK) 02:01, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

see activerain.com/blogsview/686262/DON-T-BE-TRICKED and the type of images the user has uploaded (nothing above web resolution lack of meta data etc). Suggests that anything uploaded without a fair use claim is probably a copyvio and should be deleted.Geni 03:32, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

images by Vinniemorano

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Deleted- F ASTILY  (TALK) 02:02, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

possible case of flickrwashing bluemask  (talk) 09:05, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Image:Sigbin.jpg
 * Image:Samuelmilby.jpg
 * Image:Zanjoemarudo.jpg
 * Image:Luisluckymanzano.jpg
 * Image:Centauride.jpg
 * Image:Sharlenesanpedro.jpg
 * Image:Japoylizardo.jpg
 * Image:Cristyfermin.jpg
 * Image:Makisigmorales.jpg
 * Image:Laraquigaman.jpg
 * Image:Jodistamaria.jpg
 * Image:Johnmanalo.jpg
 * Image:Jiromanio.jpg
 * Image:Monsour.jpg
 * Image:Isabelblaesi.jpg
 * Image:Marielrodrigues.jpg
 * Image:Yayoaguila.jpg
 * Image:Erichgonzales.jpg
 * Image:Matteogian.jpg
 * Image:Sidlucerokung.jpg
 * Image:Joshuadionisioposting.jpg
 * Image:Toferchuckiedangculos.jpg
 * Image:Benjokidbullykristofer.jpg
 * Image:Dangculoscharmingprince.jpg
 * Image:Kristofertontondangculos.jpg
 * Image:Janemoioineza.jpg
 * Image:Teddyelizapineda.jpg
 * Image:Kidchubby-josephandregarcia.jpg
 * Image:Chubbyandregarcia.jpg
 * Image:Jai kungfukids.jpg
 * Image:Echidnaserpent.jpg
 * Image:Birdwomansiren.jpg
 * Image:Fireballsantelmo.jpg
 * Image:Demanbabytiyanak.jpg
 * Image:Aswangdevil.jpg
 * Image:Mariacacaolady.jpg
 * Image:Mariasunukuanlady.jpg
 * Image:Beautifulmagayonlady.jpg
 * Image:Daragangmagayonlady.jpg
 * Delete all. Flickrwashing indeed. Ian ¹³  /t  19:42, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Saurav ganguly.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:00, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

This looks like the kind of picture taken for a profile on a player's website. The uploader also has a history of adding images against the requirements (see User talk:Sourodeep chakravarty). User:YellowMonkey also thought it was a copyvio and removed it from the article this was originally on. And, if it matters, there's now a free image available on Commons that is on use on both articles where this was (Sourav Ganguly & St. Xavier's Collegiate School). Searched through about 30 pages of google results on various queries & the player's Cricinfo gallery (usual source of these copyvios) and it wasn't listed, but it still looks suspicious. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 13:41, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Lapo_Elkann.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:00, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

The source website does not appear to be a public domain image source... Sherool (talk) 13:49, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Krikalev_rsa.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

On the source website (404'ed now but see this Internet Archive shapshot) this image is atributed as a "RGNIITsPK picture". I'm not entierly sure what exactly that means (a Google search only found a few more images with simmilar attribution, no explanation on what it means), I'm guessing some Russian agency or other. Be that as it may it's not clear why the image should be considered public domain, I don't believe Russian government works are automaticaly public domain, not even Soviet era ones (I could be wrong though, but needs more info if that's the case). Sherool (talk) 14:26, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * They are in the public domain, per PD-RU-exempt. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:32, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Kukowski.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:00, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Tagged as PD, but in the summary it says "Author allows the publication of this painting at Wikipedia", permission for use on Wikipedia alone is not public domain, it's not even a permissable free license. Sherool (talk) 15:40, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Lev_Simcha.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:00, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Not rely any source info here, looks like it might be a newspaper scan or simmilar, so probably not PD as stated. Might be possible to make a case for a non-free use exception if only we knew more about the source though, hence listing here. Sherool (talk) 17:36, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Territorial changes of Germany

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Image does not exist. If the image name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:00, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Sorry to bother, I'm just trying this out Me (talk) 22:34, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Cow magnet.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:00, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Image comes from http://science.howstuffworks.com/magnet4.htm which credits amazon.com. B (talk) 23:16, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.