Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 September 17



Image:MacedonianFlagSkopjeHall.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Unlikely to be self-made: web-resolution, small size, camera data is not that of the uploader's own camera known from other (more plausible) uploads of his. User has a history of dodgy uploads mixed in with some good ones. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:05, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Ztgungy1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image of a copyrighted figure without FUR or license  MBisanz  talk 14:20, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Gilvaderzoidstrader.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image of a copyrighted figure without FUR or license  MBisanz  talk 14:20, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Ztgungy2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image of a copyrighted figure without FUR or license  MBisanz  talk 14:20, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:01056.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Copyrighted statue (unveiled in 2000 ); not fair use. dave pape (talk) 18:18, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Lord_Boyce.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Can't find any info on the source website about this beeing PD. Think it might be an official photo of some kind from the UK navy, but AFAIK that would make it subject to "crown copyright", not PD. Sherool (talk) 18:20, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Divine Horsemen-Devil's river liner lyrics-credits.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I2 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

The authors are Matt Lee, Chris D., J. Christensen and there is no evidence that all three gave up their copyright in the lyrics. -- Suntag  ☼  00:10, 17 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep This is Mr.lee's property and published work.His name is even on it! The person that nominated this is going out of his way to do this as this is evidence to keep Mr. Lee online here at wiki and nard apparently does'nt like that. Mr.Lee wrote or co-wrote the songs shown and has license to post this info. D.Schneider(69.231.39.97 (talk) 19:36, 18 September 2008 (UTC))
 * If Mr. Lee's business is to make money through music, why would he want to give away his property by posting it on Wikipedia? Why would the two other authors of the lyrics give their rights to Mr. Lee for the purpose of him posting to Wikipedia? You say Mr. Lee has license to post this info, but the license used on Wikipedia removes that right from Mr. Lee. This does not make any sense. -- Suntag  ☼  19:53, 18 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note the image is a simple record's liner notes. The cover is all over the net, so is the liner note portion shown here.D.Schneider(69.231.39.97 (talk) 19:38, 18 September 2008 (UTC))

How do i correct the license issue? I obviously listed it incorrectly. My bad. D.Schneider(69.231.39.97 (talk) 20:20, 18 September 2008 (UTC)) - Commons image. Garion96 (talk) 20:10, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Lust_auf_Heimat.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.- F ASTILY  (TALK) 02:01, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Pretty sure this would count as a derivative of the campaighn poster and not as an original photo the uploader is free to release to the public domain. Sherool (talk) 18:43, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I have removed the pd licence tag and replaced it with the fair use rationale usually used with campaign posters here at Wikipedia.   21:40, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:US-Patent-Trademark-site-pg.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Surrounded by non-free content. ViperSnake151 19:54, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * It could be de minimis, and it could also be cropped. It seems kind of unencyclopedic and no longer needed though. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:30, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:D'ArtagnanStatue.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Although you certified it, there be no FOP in France ViperSnake151 19:56, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * No, there is not FOP in France, but I did some reasearch and I'm pretty sure the statue was sculpted by Gustave Doré, which means we are well beyond 70 years PMA. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:29, 17 September 2008 (UTC)


 * FOP and PMA are beyond me I'm afraid. But I've done some digging, and the town website states that the statue was designed in 1930. Statue's entry on the town website. Hope that helps. Off the Rails (talk) 01:10, 18 September 2008 (UTC)


 * FOP = Freedom of Panorama, PMA = death of the author (I think it stands for post mortem). Anyways, I thought the statue was by Gustave Doré, but if it was designed in 1930, it clearly isn't. Is it a copy of a Doré statue perhaps? IronGargoyle (talk) 18:31, 18 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Dore sculpted the one in Paris (Image:Statue d'Artagnan Paris.jpg). The Auch sculpture is by fr:Firmin Michelet (1875-1951), according to both his article and fr:Charles de Batz de Castelmore d'Artagnan.  (And PMA = "post mortem auctoris" (after death of author)).  --dave pape (talk) 03:02, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:DodgeFountainHartPlazadetroit.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

I thought there wasn't FOP in the US ViperSnake151 21:46, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * There certainly isn't. Stifle (talk) 15:07, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Web produktbild.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I2 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

It is unlikely company gave up its copyright in its underware logo and appearance and there is no evidence of this. -- Suntag  ☼  22:30, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Please explain further about the issue.

We would like to have our picture on Wikipedia, but will not give up our copyrights of the brand, the logo nor the appearance. However, we allow wikipedia to show the picture only in relation to the written article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oboyhenke (talk • contribs) 09:04, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Then the image is not free and cannot be used on Wikipedia. See this statement from our founder. Stifle (talk) 15:05, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Stifle (talk) 10:17, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Arnold hmm.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence that the image came from the Governor of California or that the Governor's office releases intellectual property into public domain. Mosmof (talk) 22:41, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Antrixwebshot.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader claims PD based on India's Right to Information Act, which does not deal with copyright, but with accessibility to government information. Unclear where the image is from, exactly. Mosmof (talk) 22:48, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Beth Chapman.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader claims the image is in PD since it is a public document, but public does not necessarily mean public domain. Mosmof (talk) 22:58, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:11482i6.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader cites a Thai law releasing "Announcements, orders and regulations" into public domain, but the law doesn't seem to apply to images. Mosmof (talk) 23:05, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

I respectfully disagree with this assessment based on the following: - Copyright laws around the world do not discriminate between different forms of expression; ie. rules apply to the work regardless whether it is a picture or written words. - "Publications" from Thai government (or any government) can be of both written words and images; if Thai law specifically states that images are copyrighted separately than written words, it would have said so. - Thai government website which the image originated from has no indication that image contents are copyrighted separately than written contents.Rgl168 (talk) 17:22, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Affirmed Statue.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

PD is claimed as the originating website does not claim copyright or ownership of images, but based on the [ http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=listFaqs#38 site FAQ], it means that the copyright belongs to the original photographer, not that the image is released. Mosmof (talk) 23:09, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.