Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 September 19



Image:GuadFlag.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Hard to believe that this licence is consitant with this Image:Region_Guadeloupe.svg Fasach Nua (talk) 10:48, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:NortherDancerBookcover.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image is used in article about the book subject, not the book itself. Additionally, the subject is dead, while the rationale claims otherwise. — Ajhodd (talk) 01:47, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Journal-Kyaw-Ma-Ma-Lay.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

GFDL Self claim - But no indications to link Uploader with the person depicted at present. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:34, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:DanielCross.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

It's high quality, I don't think the user made it. It has no information except for the PD-self template. Guy0307 (talk) 12:32, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I found more details in the metadata. The author is, according to the metadata, Sebastian Costanzo. Guy0307 (talk) 07:05, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:The Pocket Studios logo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Company logo not likely to be CC sharealike JD554 (talk) 13:22, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:39094765 kpakabig220-1-.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence that author has released image into the public domain. In fact, no author listed. Nick—Contact/Contribs 15:19, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete copyright violation from BBC. -- 'Kanonkas' : Talk  16:50, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Callum keith rennie.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

There is something resembling a copyright note at the top of the picture in the hair of the subject, but I can't see it well. — Rosenknospe (talk) 19:11, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Seems to be done as we got the author's confirmation via OTRS. → Christian .И  17:54, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Climate Camp 04.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

This image's source is only listed as UK Indymedia, and a more specific source is not given, therefore I am unable to verify the license of the image. It's definitely a keeper, though, if we can verify the license. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:48, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Image is on  (near the middle).  I don't see any license on that page, and so far haven't found any general copyright or licensing statement on the site.  --dave pape (talk) 01:12, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Retagged as {{subst:npd}} per the final bullet point on Template:PUI. Stifle (talk) 14:28, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.