Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 September 8



Image:Spike_Piledriver1.gif
This gif appears to have been put together with frames taken from DVD screengrabs, which would constitute copyright infringement — Don't fall asleep  zzzzzz 06:14, 8 September 2008 (UTC).

Image:Royal_Butterfly5.gif
This gif appears to have been put together with frames taken from DVD screengrabs, which would constitute copyright infringement. — Don't fall asleep  zzzzzz 06:12, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:ClintCurtis2007.jpg
It is not clear that this user is Clint Curtis and owns the copyright to release it under PD-self Bigr  Tex  01:47, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Arnoldatienza.png
the image appears to be photomanipulated. no indication that the uploader is the copyright owner of the original file. bluemask (talk) 10:32, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Undertaker,_Vince_McMahon,_Brock_Lesnar,_&_Sable_in_a_WWE_ring.JPG
Event footage, No evidence for permission of event organiser Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:08, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Am I missing something? It appears a fan took the photo, therefore permission from the event organiser (in this case World Wrestling Entertainment) isn't needed. D.M.N. (talk) 13:30, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Michael Garling.jpg
No indication on the source page that this image is released under a free license. J Milburn (talk) 12:31, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Please note, the subject matter (Michael Garling) has given me personal authority to use this photo. He has added a notification to the page.--RobbieMayona (talk) 15:48, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note the source provided (according to over IRC- I do not use Facebook) is 404. J Milburn (talk) 16:58, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Garling has re-uploaded the image to his personal 'GoldenEyeRa' ImageShack page. http://img110.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc00051avaut0.jpg is the new source.--RobbieMayona (talk) 15:48, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * That seems legit. The article has been deleted now, but I suppose the image can stay in case he does become notable. J Milburn (talk) 15:45, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Senegalese kaftan.jpg
No indication on the source page that this image is free. J Milburn (talk) 13:14, 8 September 2008 (UTC)


 * It's almost surely a self-made photo, so he is the copyright owner, and he can set the license he wants. Looking at the root page of the source ad the "about me" link, he is a  migerian doctor who makes photos of Nigeria. He has a page full of self-made amateur photos, all nigerian themed . --Enric Naval (talk) 14:59, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:VixKixPromo2.JPG
Looks like a publicity shot, the name used by the uploader does not match the author's name. J Milburn (talk) 13:16, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:VQE5000A.jpg
Painting by a still-living artist, very unlikely to be public domain. J Milburn (talk) 13:17, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:TXA.jpg
This building was not completed until 1930 so the image cannot be PD-1923 as tagged. Nv8200p talk 16:43, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Britney J Spears.png
AGF and all that, but given the creator's lengthy history, I don't believe that he is the copyright holder. Appears to be a professional photograph & has no metadata. – iride  scent  16:50, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:BritneySpears2008VMA.jpg
Copy right vio, we've had this image up a lot today on the Britney article. Its a copy right vio. — Realist  2  17:37, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Please note, after realizing his mistake, the editor trimmed the bottom of the picture off so that it wouldn't reveal the AP sign. See hear for his original upload. — Realist  2  18:14, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * And instead of selling the photo for a bajillion dollars, he decided to release it into the public domain. Asher196 (talk) 00:18, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Britney J Spears.jpg
And another almost certain copyvio from User:Mr Vinx – iride  scent  17:55, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:443-OE3-Gloster-Grouse-3-ES.jpg
Claimed to be PD-US - however the aircraft in Photo (which is a demonstrator Gloster Gamecock, not a Gloster Grouse as claimed was not built until 1926 - therefore photo must date later than 1923. There is no author information, so it unclear whether copyright has expired as claimed.Nigel Ish (talk) 19:47, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Grouse.gif
Claimed as expired copyright and tagged pd-author - no evidence that uploader (or website claimed as source) is copyright holder. Photo probably taken ~1925. Author is not clear therefore unclear whether copyright has expired Nigel Ish (talk) 19:57, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Britney vma.jpg
Yet another in today's endless stream of dubious Britney Spears photos. I find it vanishingly unlikely that the uploader was standing a few feet from the stage at a major awards ceremony. No metadata, appears professionally posed, take your pick. – iride  scent  23:05, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedied as a blatant copyvio. Stifle (talk) 19:44, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Helena rojo.jpg
Looks like an obvious screen capture to me. I very much doubt the uploader is the copyright holder. – iride  scent  23:36, 8 September 2008 (UTC)