Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 April 13



File:Nashik city.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

too small to be 100% sure, but it appears that there is a (c) watermark in the lower left-hand corner Skier Dude  ( talk ) 00:32, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * There does indeed seem to be a watermark there. If the uploader cannot explain this in some way, I agree that the image should be deleted. Awadewit (talk) 03:51, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:My girl.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

appears to be screencap from film, uploader not (c) holder Skier Dude  ( talk ) 02:09, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree with Skier Dude that this appears to be a frame from a film and that the uploader is not the copyright holder. As such, it should have a FUR. I'm not sure what article this image should be in, so I cannot even contact the appropriate editors. We should therefore delete it. Awadewit (talk) 03:53, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Radiologo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

orphaned, no source, if legit logo, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude  ( talk ) 02:24, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Per WP:LOGO, this image cannot be copyrighted because the logo is purely typeface. It can be trademarked, however. Awadewit (talk) 03:56, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Rv16.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

series of game screenshots for Roma Victor, all incorrectly licensed PD - including File:Rv13.jpg ‎File:Rv13.jpg ‎File:Rv11.jpg File:Rv8.jpg ‎ File:Rv9.jpg File:Rv7.jpg File:Rv5.jpg ‎File:Rv3.jpg ‎File:Rv4.jpg ‎ File:Rv2.jpg File:Rv1a.jpg ‎  Skier Dude  ( talk ) 03:43, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I've left a note at the Talk:Roma Victor. Perhaps one of the editors there will help add some FURs. If that does not happen, these should definitely be deleted as the copyright is owned by the software company. Awadewit (talk) 04:06, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Lindberg Southern Belle riverboat kit.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

If it's a photography of the box front, wouldn't the publisher (Lindberg Models) own the copyright to that, since it isn't in the public domain? As such, it would be a non-free image which isn't appropriate as used at 1:64 scale. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:25, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree that the copyright is owned by the publisher. The editors at that article should at least be given a chance to write a FUR, however. I've left a note at Talk:1:64 scale. If a FUR is not forthcoming, the image should be deleted. Awadewit (talk) 04:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Schway screenshot.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Screenshot of a commercial website. I doubt this has been released under a free license. J Milburn (talk) 10:14, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * This image is copyrighted by the Schway corporation (see website). As it is feasible that a shot of the company's website might be justified on the company's article, I've left a note at Talk:Schway regarding the use of fair use images and encouraging the editors to add a FUR. Without the addition of a FUR, however, this image should be deleted. Awadewit (talk) 04:17, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Clifford zavoloka.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Album cover. Almost certainly not released under a free license. J Milburn (talk) 11:04, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Agreed - few album covers are. Moreover, the website from which this was downloaded claims a copyright over the entire site for Zavoloka. This should be deleted. Awadewit (talk) 04:20, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Zavoloka-Agf.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Album cover. Almost certainly not released under a free license. J Milburn (talk) 11:04, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Agreed - few album covers are. Moreover, the website from which this was downloaded claims a copyright over the entire site for Zavoloka. This should be deleted. Awadewit (talk) 04:21, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Zavoloka-PLAVYNA.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Album cover. Almost certainly not released under a free license. J Milburn (talk) 11:05, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:EGHS logo.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

orphaned, low quality, if legit logo, uploader would not likely be (c) holder Skier Dude  ( talk ) 17:02, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Brian budd.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

multiple conflicting licenses; highly doubt CC2.5 is correct Skier Dude  ( talk ) 17:21, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:14, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:DWW 07-06-2008 11;40;16AM.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

orphaned, appears to be scan of book, not a photo Skier Dude  ( talk ) 17:26, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:DWW 07EEE3~1 (2).JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

given pixelation & blur (left side), appears to be scan of book or newpaper article, not of picture Skier Dude  ( talk ) 17:27, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Timothy D. Hobart GetAttachment.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

given odd size of image & artifacts, appears to be book scan Skier Dude  ( talk ) 17:31, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Will. 07-05-2008 11;43;35PM.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

clearly scan of book & not a picture Skier Dude  ( talk ) 17:32, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:David 204.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:14, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

scan of professionally-distributed football cards, not photos Skier Dude  ( talk ) 17:33, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Upton 1967 h2.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

appears to be a yearbook or similar scan, not a photo Skier Dude  ( talk ) 17:34, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Bankston 07-04-2008 03;43;19PM.JPG
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

given image artifacts & odd top border, appears to be scan of newspaper or similar source Skier Dude  ( talk ) 19:22, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Bradshaw 07-04-2008 03;26;51PM.JPG
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

from pixelation & odd top border, appears to be scan of yearbook or other similar source Skier Dude  ( talk ) 19:47, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Brewer 07-04-2008 03;22;53PM.JPG
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

from pixelation/crosshatching, appears to be scan of yearbook or other similar source Skier Dude  ( talk ) 19:47, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Bruce Crawford MSP.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

no source provided, appears to be official headshot Skier Dude  ( talk ) 19:53, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Christine Grahame MSP.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

no source, from background appears to be official headshot Skier Dude  ( talk ) 19:59, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.