Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 April 15



File:Library Roosevelt Study Center Wikipedia.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image appears at http://www.roosevelt.nl/smartsite.dws?ch=RSC&id=1034. No evidence of a GFDL license. fuzzy510 (talk) 02:24, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Vestryhall.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

Just confused here. Image is tagged as both being in the public domain and being fair-use. One is wrong, obviously. fuzzy510 (talk) 03:03, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


 * It's in the public domain and it is also used as a logo for the Ancient Monuments Society; because I used the word "logo" in the description, a bot then tagged it as a logo. I have now removed all mentions of logo so hopefully that won't happen again.  SilkTork  *YES! 07:07, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mizraab.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

no source given for the 4 base photos used herein Skier Dude  ( talk ) 04:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC)  Skier Dude  ( talk ) 04:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MC1pyayroadfront.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Based on the uploader's other recent image uploads, it appears very likely that this image has just been taken from another website. Notice that the metadata on the various images refers to a wide range of camera makes; it is unlikely that someone would own so many cameras. Stifle (talk) 14:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Npdcityhall.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Based on the uploader's other recent image uploads, it appears very likely that this image has just been taken from another website. Notice that the metadata on the various images refers to a wide range of camera makes; it is unlikely that someone would own so many cameras. Stifle (talk) 14:21, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:NayPyiTaw.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Based on the uploader's other recent image uploads, it appears very likely that this image has just been taken from another website. Stifle (talk) 14:21, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MC1inside.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Based on the uploader's other recent image uploads, it appears very likely that this image has just been taken from another website. Notice that the metadata on the various images refers to a wide range of camera makes; it is unlikely that someone would own so many cameras. Stifle (talk) 14:22, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ministrybuilding.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Based on the uploader's other recent image uploads, it appears very likely that this image has just been taken from another website. Notice that the metadata on the various images refers to a wide range of camera makes; it is unlikely that someone would own so many cameras. Stifle (talk) 14:23, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Andrei kozlov.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Here the photo is claimed to be made by Reuters. I was unable to find the original Reuters photo, but still seems to be copyvio. Blacklake (talk) 15:15, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Butterfeild.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

This link http://encarta.msn.com/media_461536702_761581480_-1_1/Alexander_Butterfield.html on the encarta web site from where this image was downloaded seems to indicate that this image is the property of the Corbis Bettman archive. There is no indication that this image was taken by employee of the Executive Office of the President of the United States. Captain-tucker (talk) 16:29, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mona-Chopra.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

orphaned, appears to be professional headshot, no source Skier Dude  ( talk ) 18:27, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Epididymovasostomy.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No indication of release of (c) at source Skier Dude  ( talk ) 19:10, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Time To Patency.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

no indication of release of (c) at source Skier Dude  ( talk ) 19:22, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Adding the following by the same uploader for the same reason: File:IVF ICSI.jpg File:Microsurgical vasovasostomy.jpg File:Vasovasostomy Layer Diagram.jpg Skier Dude  ( talk ) 19:31, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:DLogieL.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image appears to be copied from http://www.mehsa.org/images/DLogieL.jpg and although the uploader claims to be the copyright holder, that's not likely to be true based on other copyright violations. Whpq (talk) 19:48, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MEHSbldgL.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image is copied from http://www.mehsa.org/images/MEHSbldgL.jpg and according to http://www.mehsa.org/MEHSbldgL.htm, the image is courtesy of Kyaw Thinn, so unless User:Sky89 is this person, they are not the copyright holder. Based on contribution history, this is very unlikely. Whpq (talk) 19:54, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:TDT New Logo white on blacksmall2.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Logo for the Toronto Dance Theatre; no evidence of any permission to publish under Creative Commons. fuzzy510 (talk) 20:19, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Appointment certificate for Franz Josef Popp 1917.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

An IP expressed the following concern: BMW is not a German court. I assume the IP does not know about PUF, so I am vouching here even though I think the IP doesn't understand what this document is. Ipatrol (talk) 21:29, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * It's PD-US-1923-abroad in any case. Stifle (talk) 10:25, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Clearly in the public domain per PD-US-1923-abroad. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:10, 16 April 2009 (UTC)


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Kknjsp.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

orphaned, no reason to believe this was released under GNU Skier Dude  ( talk ) 22:16, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Komennewbrandpostcard.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

orphaned, highly doubt that uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude  ( talk ) 22:24, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Rac seal green625.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

orphaned logo, doubtful uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude  ( talk ) 23:02, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Roughrider.gif
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

orphaned logo, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude  ( talk ) 23:09, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.