Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 August 16



File:Luvmembers.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Uploader clearly states that it's a copyrighted image that's currently on a fansite. Regardless of the fact that he owns the album and has permission from the fansite owner, it's still under copyright and s/he's certainly not "the author of this work". SKS (talk) 00:23, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Nor-irlhead.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:24, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

This gif file appears to be some sort of scan, possibly a scan of a brain. There is no evidence given or any evidence to believe that the user is the copyright owner. -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 20:02, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:NorIr-Cyr111.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:24, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

This gif file appears to be some sort of scan, possibly a scan of a brain. There is no evidence given or any evidence to believe that the user is the copyright owner. -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 20:02, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Tjfnewpic.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: deleted without prejudice to restoration if WP:OTRS is received (uploader was informed of the how-to). Skier Dude ( talk ) 02:28, 1 September 2009 (UTC) Image appears to have been taken from elsewhere. J Milburn (talk) 22:08, 16 August 2009 (UTC)


 * This is my image, how can i prove this to you? Michaeldcoates (talk) 22:27, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Johnnhazard.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: delete Mere ownership is not proof of (c) - need proof of who owner (educational institution?) is. Skier Dude  ( talk ) 02:33, 1 September 2009 (UTC) I doubt the uploader is the copyright holder of this image. J Milburn (talk) 22:14, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep this is my own copy of an obituary program photograph. Do not delete.  My original reproduction was fair use of an important academic, also for academic reasons.  There is no competing copyright claim.  I am the copyright holder of this image and I release it to the public domain.  Majordomo41 (talk) 22:48, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Did you take this picture? Just having a copy of the photo does not make you the copyright holder. The copyright holder of this photo could be the original photographer, or the corporate or governing body that commissioned the photo. &lt;&gt;Multi-Xfer&lt;&gt; (talk) 00:50, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Naval Air Force Roundel.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  10:51, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

I doubt the uploader is the copyright holder of the Mexican Naval Air Force Roundel. J Milburn (talk) 22:18, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence to suggest that the user is the copyright owner of the logo. -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 23:24, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.