Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 August 17



File:Mortlemurmouse.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  10:51, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Taken from a movie. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:03, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Highly unlikely the uploader is the copyright holder of the work. -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 23:21, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:GLCover.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  10:51, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Magazine covers usually aren't free. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:05, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 23:21, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MillerLiteComedyFinalists.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  10:51, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Are all of the images used in this composite also Public Domain? –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:09, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes. I obtained all images from Google Images Search and a couple of other random websites.  Chicago Smooth (talk) 10:31, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * That does not make the images public domain. Google indexes almost all images on the web, regardless of their copyright status. An image on the web is only public domain if the webpage which it is on explicitly says that the image is public domain. Would it be possible for you to list the websites that they were on? Then their copyright status could be checked again. If you're not sure of the sites, then I think that to stay on the legal safe side this image would need to be deleted. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 16:03, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Alice-wonerland.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  23:20, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Obvious copyvio; being from 1951 or later, not PD in US unless released without notice of copyright before 1978 (I think that's the year; not positive). –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:12, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Don Omar.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  10:51, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Based on image size, lack of metadata, and uploader's previous troubles with image copyright, I'm suspicious of this, too. See also this Tineye search which would seem to confirm a copyvio (note: link will only last for a few days). –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:15, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:JoJo All I Want Is Everything Cover.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  10:51, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Album cover (I think), so probably isn't free. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:7474.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  10:51, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Per discussion at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content/Archive 42, images of scale models of fictional objects are derived works for the original copyright owner and still fall under the WP:NFCC criteria for use on Wikipedia. Even if a person assembled the model and photographed it, they can not release the the image of the model under a free-use license. --Farix (Talk) 03:09, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Happyface wallpaper.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:18, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

The claim was made that the base image is by a NASA satellite and therefore public domain, but it's clearly not a real photograph but a computer rendering/artist's rendition and covered by copyright. Also can't see an encyclopedic reason for having this anyway. DreamGuy (talk) 13:22, 17 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I was told it was a NASA satellite image, though that was taken on faith. How can you tell it's not?


 * Anyway, I'm just using it in my user space, so if it needs deleting it's not a big deal. 8bit (talk) 19:52, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Actorsfund02.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  10:51, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

From www.broadwayworld.com ; use Tineye search. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 17:30, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per WP:CSD. Copyright Violation. -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 23:23, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Varolii logo.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  10:51, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Logos aren't usually free. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 17:31, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * This seems a bit too simple for copyright, per PD-textlogo. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:41, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Good point, but what about the stylized "L" and "I"s? –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:10, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * It's way too simple. The "I"s just have apostrophe marks above them, and I'm not even seeing how the "L" is stylized. It is probably just how the letter "L" is stylized in this font. There is no other "L" to compare it to. I've !voted keep in some borderline PD-textlogo cases before, but this is not one of them. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:30, 18 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 23:23, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Image_name.ext

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace " " with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put your reason for deletion just after " ". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:PUF or at my talk page. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:20, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

reason Ariellarobison73 (talk) 21:10, 17 August 2009 (UTC) I am the web marketing manager for Varolii Corporation. This corporate logo (Varolii_logo.gif) is owned by Varolii Corporation and can therefore be used on the Varolii entry on Wikipedia. Please contact me with any further questions or concerns over the licensing of this file.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cosmic Connection.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Orphaned, & did not address the base image(s) that were photoshopped. Skier Dude ( talk ) 01:09, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

This image seems to have been cropped from a promotional image of some sort. There is no evidence given or any evidence to believe that the uploader is the copyright owner. -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 22:38, 17 August 2009 (UTC)


 * This image was developed by me using photoshop. I have freely distributed this image to many friends and do not impose a copy right on it. So anybody can use it free. So does Wikipedia.--PNSKTY (talk) 04:23, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.