Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 August 27



File:2000s decade portrait.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:09, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Compilation of images which are variously released to public domain, creative commons, and other free licenses. However, I don't believe that the right to modify extends to re-licensing. Uploader appears to be claiming the right to take CC images and relicense to public domain. (ESkog)(Talk) 01:36, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Retag as cc-by-sa-3.0. All the images are under licenses compatible with cc-by-sa-3.0, and the uploader clearly intends to release his modifications as PD. Stifle (talk) 11:31, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, unless license info on can be found. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 17:37, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:JohnMarshallMetalChurch.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:38, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

It appears to be a screen capture of A Year and a Half in the Life of Metallica. Rockfang (talk) 09:27, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:2009-0805-MN-LeSueur-Giant.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:41, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Derivative work of the two-dimensional sculpture in the image. Powers T 14:34, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Swedish Passport.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:38, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

The uploader (Erasheed) has uploaded nothing but copyrighted images found on the internet, usually with inappropriate licenses. Extremely unlikely he/she took this picture. Gump Stump (talk) 16:33, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Palestinian Passport.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:38, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

The uploader (Erasheed) has uploaded nothing but copyrighted images found on the internet, usually with inappropriate licenses. A smaller version of the picture can be found here; extremely unlikely he/she took this picture. Gump Stump (talk) 16:35, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Bhuvaneswari2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:57, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

No meta data avalable and not shown it is a uploader.s artwork. Previous delete log for same named file. Look the google image search and find this pic.- Jayanta Nath (Talk 18:25, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

As noted, this image was created by me approximately two years ago. The yantra was coloured by me, the image is fair-use under the Indian Copyright Act as noted, being well over 50 years old (in fact several hundred years old), and the context being completly new, self-created and original. There is no valid or legal reason for deletion of this image. (96.238.51.21 (talk) 12:25, 29 August 2009 (UTC))

Re: statement "Previous delete log for same named file." <== current image is a replacement for an earlier image of same deity, which was a lithographic print, but could not be verified as older than 50 years. The present, replacement image is an entirely different, self-made image. (Devi bhakta (talk) 12:28, 29 August 2009 (UTC))


 * yantra is not virifiable without sourec of this image (50 years old).If you coloured this image, Please give link/source this yantra called image. context being completly new, self-created and original. (means lower part of this image?),please upload separately as svg/png. Other than it is not shown it is your work. Thanks.- Jayanta Nath (Talk 16:21, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MichelleWilliams001.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:38, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

At best, this seems like a picture taken from a computer screen. No indication that the uploader has the copyright to this image. —  Σ  xplicit 18:37, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MichelleWilliams004.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:38, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

At best, this seems like a picture taken from a computer screen. No indication that the uploader has the copyright to this image. —  Σ  xplicit 18:38, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SalazrIN.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:38, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Cited source leads to a 404 error, but it's not a .gov site. No evidence that it's PD-USGov as cited. (ESkog)(Talk) 18:59, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Remaining uploads by Wellness21

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: deleted  Skier Dude  ( talk ) 02:03, 18 September 2009 (UTC) have a rater horrible track record for uploading images taken from various website claimed as his own. The only remaining images that have not yet been deleted are various photos of buildings, but these are also highly suspect:
 * File:School of nursing.jpg (clearly taken from here)
 * File:Holticulturesyu.jpg (clearly taken from here)
 * File:Contentssyu.jpg (clearly taken from here)
 * File:2sciencehall.jpg (clearly taken from here)
 * File:Syusciencehall.jpg (clearly taken from here)

The rest I haven't been eable to track down any specific sources for but they are generaly "web resolution" images with no description and, with only one exception, have no EXIF information. Given the users track record it seems unlikely to be his own photos.


 * File:Gymsyu.jpg
 * File:Esrakwan.jpg
 * File:Librarysyu.jpg
 * File:Sinhackhallfront.jpg
 * File:Schoolovmusicsyu.jpg
 * File:Samuelkwan.jpg
 * File:Ethleticssyu.jpg
 * File:Paul36.jpg
 * File:Hwarangdaeentrance.jpg
 * File:Subway6seoul.jpg
 * File:Stataasdf456.jpg
 * File:Cpofsyu.jpg (this is the only file in the set with any EXIF meta-data)

Since the user have indiscriminately tagged everything he have ever uploaded as his own work for a long time despite multiple notices, warnings and a block I don't think we can afford to trust the remaining uploads just because we have not yet found any direct online source for them. --Sherool (talk) 19:12, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KTM 65 SX.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep. Files tagged with fair-use are not in violation of copyright. — ξ xplicit  07:50, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Contrary to the claim made in the licence, this image is not unrepeatable and a free image could easily be created to replace it. It is a motorcycle which is on sale to the general public and anyone could take a photo for addition to Wikipedia / Wikimedia Commons. Therefore I contest that the licence used is invalid and the image should be deleted. Biker Biker (talk) 23:23, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:38, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:KTM 450 EXC.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep. Files tagged with fair-use are not in violation of copyright. — ξ xplicit  07:50, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Same argument as other image I just tagged. Contrary to the claim made in the licence, this image is not unrepeatable and a free image could easily be created to replace it. It is a motorcycle which is on sale to the general public and anyone could take a photo for addition to Wikipedia / Wikimedia Commons. Therefore I contest that the licence used is invalid and the image should be deleted. Biker Biker (talk) 23:24, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:38, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.