Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 August 3



File:Pr20747.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Kept. Moved to Commmons with more specific disclaimer. -Andrew c [talk] 21:55, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Also nominating:
 * File:Ringling pc5667.jpg
 * File:Mf0145.jpg
 * File:Tbuf rc01386.gif
 * File:Tbuf rc01381.jpg
 * File:Mf1006.gif
 * File:Pc5917.jpg
 * File:Strozier pc5919.jpg
 * File:Westcott rc05025.jpg
 * File:FSU protest Tallahassee rc01458.jpg

See Templates_for_deletion/Log/2007_May_6, there is no reason to believe this image has actually been released under a free license. The Florida Memory Archives website makes no mention of such a license. B (talk) 03:13, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

The use of photographs and other materials in the custody of the State Archives of Florida is governed by state law and, in some cases, by the terms of the donation agreement under which the Archives acquired the images. In accordance with the provisions of Section 257.35(6), Florida Statutes, "Any use or reproduction of material deposited with the Florida Photographic Collection shall be allowed pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1)(b) and subsection (4), provided that appropriate credit for its use is given."
 * The State Library and Archives of Florida - Florida Memory Project Photographic Collection website says this about use of its images:
 * This policy is based upon Florida State Statute Section 257.35 which is even more explicit about ownership of images donated to the Archives:

F.S. 257.35(3): Title to any record transferred to the Florida State Archives, as authorized in this chapter, shall be vested in the division.

F.S. 257.35 (6)(c): Any use or reproduction of material deposited with the Florida State Photographic Collection shall be allowed pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1)(b) and subsection (4) provided that appropriate credit for its use is given.


 * Consequently, I see no reason to fear images originating with the Florida Memory Project which are identified as such. As a result I am asking that the current interpretation and general prohibition of Florida Memory Project images be returned to its earlier licensing status. --Sirberus (talk) 22:03, 11 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment hmm, there is that part of the disclaimer that says some of the images are subject to copyright. That was the main point in deleting the template as I understand it, it's also not entierly clear if they just allow copying or if they consider the material free for any use. However note that all the images in the Florida Memory Project's Flickr photostream is labeled as "No known copyright restrictions", and their Flickr disclaimer is a lot more explicit than the general disclaimer page: "Acquisitions documentation transferring all rights to the Archives is obtained from the donor at the time of the transfer. Despite no known copyright restrictions, these photos may be subject to other third party rights, such as rights of privacy and rights of publicity." Those 3. party rights are not a problem, see General disclaimer. So with no known copyright restrictions it would seem that at least any photos they have uploaded to Flickr should be usable... --Sherool (talk) 14:49, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The statement that Carnildo referenced in the TFD for the template seems to no longer be there. I'd say there's a high degree of probability, based on the Florida statute cited, that they were permissively licensed all along and that statement was put on the website by someone who didn't understand the implications of it.  Commons:Category:Images_from_the_Florida_Photographic_Collection has a statement from the State Archives of Florida affirming that we can use the images.  I would strongly suggest uploading these (and any other images from this collection) to Commons and placing them in this category so that the statement from Commons is readily present to answer any questions. --B (talk) 15:21, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I find B's solution workable. What perhaps could be considered is some sort of shortcut for future editors that would direct them to place uploaded Archives images in Commons and avoid this issue in the future. --Sirberus (talk) 23:36, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Papas fritas helioself.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:22, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Bogus public-domain claim for an album cover. Chubbles (talk) 04:32, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Papas fritas album .jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:22, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Bogus public-domain claim for an album cover. Chubbles (talk) 04:35, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Pop has freed us .jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:22, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Bogus public-domain claim for an album cover. Chubbles (talk) 04:37, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Vlcsnap-2798787.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Image is a screenshot from a YouTube video. Also, the user who uploaded it deleted the previous discussion regarding this image, meaning it was not properly dealt with. IIIVIX ( Talk ) 06:59, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Vlcsnap-2821970.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Image is a screenshot from a YouTube video. Also, the user who uploaded it deleted the previous discussion regarding this image, meaning it was not properly dealt with. IIIVIX ( Talk ) 06:59, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Debden-broadway.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Copied from: MRSC (talk) 07:37, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Hilton-washington-dc.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Copyvio from this site. I asked User:Infrogmation to access a previously deleted file (on Commons), and he confirmed that it's the same photo. See here for the discussion.  APK  that's not my name  13:45, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Matt_Clark.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:22, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Clearly not work of uploader... - Screencap Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:15, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Albanians.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:22, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Photo-montage - Indvidual sources not listed Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:34, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Papas Fritas Helioself 116909.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Bogus public-domain claim for an album cover. Chubbles (talk) 20:29, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:LilyYoung.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Screenshot from a copyrighted music video. Uploader unlikely to own the rights. J Milburn (talk) 22:43, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:1963 Mercury S-55.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:22, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

"Author - Unknown, Source - Google Images". Why the assumption of PD? J Milburn (talk) 22:45, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Vinyllife.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:22, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

"(All images are copyrighted by their respective copyright owners) ". Not seeing any reason to assume this CC. J Milburn (talk) 22:46, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.