Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 December 11



File:Letter to GERS from AFM & AFTRA Recording Artist Royalty checks for his recording work with Jimi Hendrix.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete. No evidence uploader is the copyright holder. Someone sending you an e-mail does not transfer the rights to you, Furthermore, the image is orphaned, and doesn't seem encyclopedic. Wikipedia is not the place to necessarily share personal correspondences like this. -Andrew c [talk] 14:43, 28 January 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Letter to GERS from AFM & AFTRA Recording Artist Royalty checks for his recording work with Jimi Hendrix.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).

This (e-mail)Letter to GERS from AFM & AFTRA Recording Artist Royalty checks for his recording work with Jimi Hendrix, was sent to me (Gers) and now I wish to share it with the public. thanksGersracing (talk) 09:22, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The user states that he is the copyright holder of a letter to GERS from AFM and AFTRA. warrior  4321  03:28, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Charlie Strong in 2009.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep. I see no reason to doubt the uploader took the image; press images generally have metadata stripped. Chick Bowen 05:50, 6 January 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Charlie Strong in 2009.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The user states he has taken the picture which seems very unlikely. warrior  4321  03:31, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I did take this picture. You can look at the meta data on the Steve Kragthorpe picture I uploaded as well.  I live in Louisville, and it isn't difficult for me to take these pictures.  MKultra (talk) 14:31, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Letter to GERS American Embassy London England from Hohner Harmonica's 1971.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete. No evidence uploader is the copyright holder. Someone sending you an letter does not transfer the rights to you. However, if published in the US before 1997 without a copyright notice (as this appears to be), it may actually be in the PD by now. But there is no copyright tag at all, nor source information (and is thus speediable). But with that said, furthermore, the image is orphaned, and doesn't seem encyclopedic. Wikipedia is not the place to necessarily share personal correspondences like this. -Andrew c [talk] 14:47, 28 January 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Letter to GERS American Embassy London England from Hohner Harmonica's 1971.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).

The letter was sent to me (Gers)c/o The American Embassy London England from Hohner Harmonica's 1971 I've had it through the years because it was special to me and I now with to share it with the public. thanksGersracing (talk) 09:16, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The user states the letter is his work which is highly untrue. warrior  4321  03:35, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Twinklefirefoxosxscreenshot.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:42, 26 December 2009 (UTC)


 * File:Twinklefirefoxosxscreenshot.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).

-- Mr.Z-man 03:53, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * This image cannot be released into the public domain.
 * 1) The Wikipedia logo is copyrighted.
 * 2) While Firefox, Twinkle, and MediaWiki are free software, this does not necessarily mean that screenshots can be released into PD.
 * 3) The Mac OS X interface is proprietary (AFAIK) and this may include copyrightable elements of it.


 * Certainly 1 applies and I now know to avoid that in the future. I am fine the file being deleted. Basket of Puppies  03:59, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Søren.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:55, 27 December 2009 (UTC)


 * File:Søren.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No evidence of permission. Very low res for a "private photo". PC78 (talk) 12:17, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Probably from http://www.musikbibliotek.dk/19357/compiled same size but still might not be original source. MilborneOne (talk) 18:15, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Aghakhan.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:42, 26 December 2009 (UTC)


 * File:Aghakhan.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Uploader states that the file was "[a]uthorized under conditional sanction", which does not sound very much like a free license. TinEye finds this image on http://ismaili.net/ and that site is not obviously releasing its materials under a free license either. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:41, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.