Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 December 14



File:CHRISTINEELISEMCCARTHYPLAIDDRESS.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:21, 29 December 2009 (UTC)


 * File:CHRISTINEELISEMCCARTHYPLAIDDRESS.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * this edit makes me think that the editor isn't Christine Elise (as the uploader claims to be on the filepage). I believe that this picture is possibly part of a photoshoot or cropped from a larger picture.   TheWeak Willed   (T * G) 00:37, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:StJohnHCadTINY.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 28 December 2009 (UTC)


 * File:StJohnHCadTINY.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Promotional material (books); no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude  ( talk ) 04:18, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Follow up; website states all images (c)/ all rights reserved.  Skier Dude  ( talk ) 03:53, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:CoverToBrunnerMythosPB.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 28 December 2009 (UTC)


 * File:CoverToBrunnerMythosPB.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Book cover; no source; metadata=photoshop; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude  ( talk ) 04:20, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Follow up; website states all images (c)/ all rights reserved.  Skier Dude  ( talk ) 03:53, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SWELLENDAM CANOLA.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:37, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


 * File:SWELLENDAM CANOLA.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Delete: image is claimed to be public domain and created by the uploader but obviously a copy from here without any evidence of permission. ww2censor (talk) 06:07, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ferentz1-300x198.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:21, 29 December 2009 (UTC)


 * File:Ferentz1-300x198.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No exif and appears to be a pro shot from a press conference. Peripitus (Talk) 11:27, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Façade of the National Opera and Ballet theater in Vilnius.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

No FoP in Lithuania so image not free, does not meet all NFCC so no valid non-free rationale: deleted. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:22, 8 January 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Façade of the National Opera and Ballet theater in Vilnius.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Delete: Lithuania has no freedom of panorama for sculptures per commons:Commons:Freedom of Panorama, so the uploader's licence is false even if he/she does not know it. ww2censor (talk) 14:14, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Probably appropriate for fair use though on the page about the article, being a particularly high-profile example of his work. Therefore  keep, but change classification and supply rationale. Jheald (talk) 20:36, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: there is already a freely licenced image File:Operos ir baleto teatras.jpg being used in Lithuanian National Opera and Ballet Theatre, so the use of this non-free image there, even with a rationale, will fail WP:NFCC for minimal use and there is no article about the sculptures themselves. ww2censor (talk) 14:03, 28 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Is it prohibited to upload a picture of artists artwork that is fair use? Or you mean if, for example, I'm a sculptor, and one of my sculptures stand in public place, I cant upload that sculptures photo into wikipedia? even if I license it under a free license..? Or in the other words.. what license should I put so this picture (that I took) would leave everyone alone? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Germantas (talk • contribs) 12:34, 29 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Only if you really are the sculptor can you release the images with a free licence, everything else is derivative and it is prohibited, under freedom of panorama restrictions for Lithuania and many other countries, for an artist work to be uploaded as fair-use especially if it does not fulfill all 10 non-free content criteria which using this image in the article about the artist does not do. It is not a matter of telling you what licence to use for this image because there is no evidence given anywhere that Juozas Kalinauskas and Germantas are the same person. In fact your question seems to be hypothetical. Please provide some proof and we will be very happy to keep this image with a free licence direct from the artist for its current use. ww2censor (talk) 15:15, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:PhaseIIPic04.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:42, 26 December 2009 (UTC)


 * File:PhaseIIPic04.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Uploaded as Non-free promotional, also uploaded to commons as own work. Commons version now tagged as a copyright violation as it is the same image (but different size) as the image at http://www.intevac.com/intevacphotonics. Wikipedia had been tagged as non-free replacable and the uploader changed it to free-promotional then blanked the page. Clearly a replacable copyrighted image MilborneOne (talk) 23:01, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.