Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 December 17



File:Faq time calendar vernal e.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

Non-commercial use is not free enough (see Image copyright tags). Commons version also nominated for deletion. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:45, 30 December 2009 (UTC)


 * File:Faq time calendar vernal e.gif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Canadian National Research Council site has no mention of Creative Commons license. Jc3s5h (talk) 01:41, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The Copyright policy of the National Research Council of Canada allows public non-commercial use without further permission. This restriction is included in the CC version used by Wikipedia. However, the NRC requirement that "Users exercise due diligence in ensuring the accuracy of the materials reproduced" may violate the CC share-alike permission which states "You let people create remixes and derivative works based on your creative work". Wikipedia is obeying this restriction. The usual sites that copy Wikipeida also don't modify their images, but I'm not sure if the CC permission gives other users some permission not allowed by the NRC. The page containing this image is the Time Services FAQ. — Joe Kress (talk) 17:55, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:NatashaPolysmile.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:48, 31 December 2009 (UTC)


 * File:NatashaPolysmile.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Yet another photo of this model uploaded as self-created by untrustworthy user (the previous three were all deleted as copyvios, including attempts to upload magazine covers as own work).  Mbinebri   talk &larr; 03:27, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Rhea Mitchell.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Keep; the file is clearly free. Wrong noticeboard. -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 00:57, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Rhea Mitchell.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * File indicates this was published before 1923, however it lacks source information which is needed for confirmation. Thirdship (talk) 04:20, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Earlyphotohotel.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:26, 24 December 2009 (UTC)


 * File:Earlyphotohotel.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The image source info doesn't state how early "early" might mean - it might be PD-old, but it's almost certainly not the uploader's own creation, especially in light of his other uploads. (ESkog)(Talk) 13:55, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete According to this page, the hotel was built in 1903 but most of the vehicles in the image weren't manufactured until at least 70 years later. The page that I linked to has a smaller version of the same image on it. The image uploaded here appears to be a scaled up version, meaning it's a copyvio, as I suspect are File:Greysugarshaker.jpg and File:Goldsugarshaker.jpg. The uploader has recently had a number of images deleted as copyvios, four of which I nominated. One of those indicated it was the view of a building taken in 2007, but the site he copied it from indicated the images were from May-June 2005, so I'm not surprised that the uploader has misrepresented the age of this image. It was a bit silly to do it with 1970s vintage cars in it though. --AussieLegend (talk) 15:25, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:StickyPasswordScreenshot.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:48, 31 December 2009 (UTC)


 * File:StickyPasswordScreenshot.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * (1) no evidence that software in question is free, and (2) image contains a non-trivial screenshot of a copyrighted web page, Facebook. (ESkog)(Talk) 13:57, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Borobudur hotel.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

Deleted - no license information was supplied in the 9 days this was listed. Orderinchaos 03:45, 26 December 2009 (UTC)


 * File:Borobudur hotel.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Source is just listed as "flickr.com", which is insufficient to verify the CC license claimed. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:08, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Achal Sahib.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:48, 31 December 2009 (UTC)


 * File:Achal Sahib.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The NIC website's terms of use do not allow commercial use or derivatives to be created. There is no explicit copyright release obvious on the http://gurdaspur.nic.in subsite. This image does not appear to be released under the CC-BY=SA license. It is also not suitable for use as non-free content as the structure pictured still exists so that this would be replaceable by a free image. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:16, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:VeryLovely.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:48, 31 December 2009 (UTC)


 * File:VeryLovely.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * File indicates this was published before 1923 in the US, however it lacks source information which is needed for confirmation. Thirdship (talk) 22:31, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MormonPopulation.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:47, 19 December 2009 (UTC)


 * File:MormonPopulation.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The worldmapper image (source) has a CC-BY-NC-ND license (copyright info). We may want to ask for specific permission that the image be licensed without the "non-commercial" restriction, which is incompatible with Wikipedia's current image policies. ...but what do you think? ~B F izz 22:34, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Screenshot-PyGlossary.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:48, 31 December 2009 (UTC)


 * File:Screenshot-PyGlossary.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Orphaned screenshot, article PyGlossary was deleted over a year ago. No source information to verify that this image is free. — ξ xplicit  23:25, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ann little.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:48, 31 December 2009 (UTC)


 * File:Ann little.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * File indicates this was taken between 1912 and 1916, however it lacks source information which is needed for confirmation. Thirdship (talk) 23:26, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.