Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 December 23



File:Muntazeri.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 25 February 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Hitman south park.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: kept as it's not a south park character  Skier Dude  ( talk ) 04:42, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Hitman south park.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).

If this a actual south park character: its orphaned fair use speedy delete else: just looks like a south park character PD-self
 * it's a south park character MisterWiki   talk   contribs  03:16, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

IngerAlHaosului (talk) 22:46, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - it's not a South Park character, as you would have known if you had read the description - it's a self-created image. Little Professor (talk) 13:20, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:696logo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 25 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:696logo.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * School team logo. Author unlikely holds the copyright to this image. — ξ xplicit  04:19, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Alias-logo.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: kept as corrected. Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:47, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Alias-logo.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Logo of a copyrighted television series no evidence of permission from copyright holder to release the logo under the terms of the Free Art license. This derivative work is at best fair use at worst infringement. Does is qualify for fair use, i let you decide.--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 17:42, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Might qualify as PD-textlogo. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 18:09, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't think the typeface is simple enough.
 * I added non-free media rationale here, so the issue should be all taken care of for now. It didn't qualify for the previous Free Art License, and I doubt the PD-textlogo rationale would apply here.— DMCer  ™  20:46, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree it should qualify for fair use now.--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 06:02, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:09, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Frankie J Mosca Headshot.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:09, 5 January 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Frankie J Mosca Headshot.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Noted as self-made but the previous version (that was deleted as lacking a licence) stated "Photo by Suzanne Sheridan". Now as far as I can tell, Suzanne Sheridan is a [www.suzannesheridan.com professional photographer]. Is this image free ? Based on current evidence....no - Peripitus (Talk) 22:22, 23 December 2009 (UTC) Peripitus (Talk) 22:22, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I contacted Suzanne Sheridan and confirmed that she is the author of this picture, she did not released under the license but has no objection on it staying on wikipedia as Copyright Suzanne M. Sheridan.So i am changing the license information and adding a rational.--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 22:17, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I added and a rational so we can consider this case closed.--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 22:36, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.